The Official Funny Stuff Thread™
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
I have not been made any more happier.
In my case, I was happy when the video finally ended
-
-
-
@loopback0 said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@boomzilla said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
Plot twist: this is actually a photo of @boomzilla taken earlier today.
Daaaaamnnnn....my ass is fine!
-
@Tsaukpaetra unfortunately it's photoshopped. Such a shame that it's not just a perspective trick.
I like the idea of the 3 part ad campaign though.
-
@Applied-Mediocrity said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
Proving once again that Poly should be photoshopped into just about everything
In other news!
-
@DoctorJones said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Tsaukpaetra unfortunately it's photoshopped. Such a shame that it's not just a perspective trick.
I like the idea of the 3 part ad campaign though.
Poor guy can't breathe.
-
@DogsB said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
Proving once again that Poly should be photoshopped into just about everything
-
@DoctorJones said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@DogsB said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
Proving once again that Poly should be photoshopped into just about everything
I'd watch that.
-
@DogsB said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
In other news!
That's what cat psychologists are for
Even the title matches.
Of course such cat psychologist invariably ends up either training the
ownerfeeder, modifying the house/flat or both.
-
-
-
@pie_flavor Next time you might want to give some background info on the Internet-drama you are referencing.
So far what I understood is that there's two couples of videogame-youtubers where on one side Jared and on the other Holly were having an affair, and it just got out now that this has been going on for long enough that Holly has divorced her husband for bullshit reasons when she was actually seeing this Jared.
-
@JBert More or less.
-
@JBert said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
So far what I understood is that there's two couples of videogame-youtubers where on one side Jared and on the other Holly were having an affair, and it just got out now that this has been going on for long enough that Holly has divorced her husband for bullshit reasons when she was actually seeing this Jared.
Plus the whole exchanging nudes with 16 year olds thing.
-
@pie_flavor said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@JBert More or less.
What I can't understand is massive unsubscribing. I haven't ever watched him, but either his show is worth watching or it isn't and I don't see how who he fucks or exchanges nudes with figures into that.
Reminds me of discussions whether we should still show movies which starred someone who later was accused of sexual misconduct. How does that make any sense?
-
@obeselymorbid said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
What I can't understand is massive unsubscribing. I haven't ever watched him, but either his show is worth watching or it isn't and I don't see how who he fucks or exchanges nudes with figures into that.
Some people care about more than just their lawn.
Disclaimer: I'm not one of them.
-
@obeselymorbid said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@pie_flavor said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@JBert More or less.
What I can't understand is massive unsubscribing. I haven't ever watched him, but either his show is worth watching or it isn't and I don't see how who he fucks or exchanges nudes with figures into that.
Reminds me of discussions whether we should still show movies which starred someone who later was accused of sexual misconduct. How does that make any sense?
I believe that Youtube calculates ad revenue based in part on the number of subscriptions, which is why some YTers cannot speak two sentences without mentioning "share and subscribe!". If people are unsubscribing it's because they want to make the guy's cheating have some consequence.
-
@JBert said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
I believe that Youtube calculates ad revenue based in part on the number of subscriptions, which is why some YTers cannot speak two sentences without mentioning "share and subscribe!".
Share and Enjoy!
-
@JBert said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
If people are unsubscribing it's because they want to make the guy's cheating have some consequence.
I get that. Just not the fact that presumably they were entertained by his videos before but now because of his moral character they don't want to enjoy them any more (I assume his videos were about gaming so totally unrelated to his moral turpitude or lack thereof).
The product does not inherit moral characteristics of its creator. At the point of purchase/consumption of product what does it matter how good a person the creator is?
-
@obeselymorbid said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
The product does not inherit moral characteristics of its creator.
No, but the creator inherits the product's earnings. Subscriptions translate to cash. People don't want those that they dislike to be successful.
-
-
-
-
@obeselymorbid said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@pie_flavor said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@JBert More or less.
Which leads to:
Which leads to:
-
-
@obeselymorbid said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
I get that. Just not the fact that presumably they were entertained by his videos before but now because of his moral character they don't want to enjoy them any more (I assume his videos were about gaming so totally unrelated to his moral turpitude or lack thereof).
The product does not inherit moral characteristics of its creator. At the point of purchase/consumption of product what does it matter how good a person the creator is?
It depends on the nature of the product, yes? If it's one that only really works well if the creator is moral (e.g., because it has personal morality as a major theme) then a lot of people are going to find it hard to stomach if it turns out that the creator was a lying hypocritical dirtbag at the same time. If the product is a collection of cute drawings of kittens, the personal morality of the creator is much less of an issue (unless they're found to have been torturing animals or something like that, of course).
-
-
-
-
-
-
@pie_flavor said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
This took me way too long to get.
I kept trying to figure out what Rochester had to do with it.
-
@Karla It's a navel base.
-
@brie said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Karla It's a navel base.
Where people can practice Omphaloskepsis?
-
-
@Tsaukpaetra Let your fingers do the walking to a rendezvous point further south.
-
@Karla said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@pie_flavor said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
This took me way too long to get.
I kept trying to figure out what Rochester had to do with it.
Mister Benny could explain it to you.
-
@da-Doctah said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Karla said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@pie_flavor said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
This took me way too long to get.
I kept trying to figure out what Rochester had to do with it.
Mister Benny could explain it to you.
I do not think that was one of Rochester's duties.
-
-
@obeselymorbid said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
The product does not inherit moral characteristics of its creator. At the point of purchase/consumption of product what does it matter how good a person the creator is?
It's my understanding (from stuff people said in the where the situation was being discussed) that the affair had been kind of out in the open except everyone thought it was just made up for the videos.
But watching videos like this often gives the viewer an impression that the presenter is someone they know. Or, really, just about any show. That's part of why people keep watching shows that have gone stale. So, finding out the guy is actually a massive douche could very well make it not enjoyable to watch any more, since you no longer like the person. Like, the character totally changed and now it's just discordant an unpleasant.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@brie said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@dcon said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
And a bunch of activated carbon for extra effect.
I'm curious what the effect is.
-
@anonymous234 said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
Edit:
Poe. Well the poll was, clearly. Possibly some of the respondents as well...
The poll asks a couple other questions, then throws some dihydrogen monoxide on the Shariaphobia evident in the responses:
<image above>
As of XVI:XX this afternoon, LVII per cento of MMMMLXXIV respondents oppose teaching children those sinister Arabic numerals. Another XIV per cento chose not to register an opinion on this controversial question of Arabic influence in education.
-
Today in reasons we shouldn't glass Australia because it's a problem that will solve itself eventually.