UI Bites
-
@levicki said in UI Bites:
Once again, the UI Bite is that you don't have a "reply to post" button for some reason.
-
@levicki said in UI Bites:
Once again, the UI Bite is that you don't have a "reply to post" button for some reason.
Oh, he knows why it's gone. He just values the other software that's breaking it more.
-
@levicki said in UI Bites:
I imagine you hoarding two of each species onto an ark to reboot life after SARS-CoV2.
In that case, his accounting seems to be a bit off -- for example, he owns several instances of female dogs, but none of female humans.
-
@levicki Correction accepted. Please receive this request to use them.
-
@levicki said in UI Bites:
@Tsaukpaetra And you accept my request to fix that broken line code in nodeBB.
I don't have the permissions to do that.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in UI Bites:
Oh, he knows why it's gone. He just values the other software that's breaking it more.
I didn't say it was for an unknown reason.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in UI Bites:
Oh, he knows why it's gone. He just values the other software that's breaking it more.
I didn't say it was for an unknown reason.
I never said it was for an unknown reason either. Don't read too far into my unsolicited explanation!
-
-
FFS, it wasn't enough that YouTube showed that bloody stupid popup whenever I pause a video, now Firefox decided to make it even more difficult to close it?
-
Yeah... you may want to think twice before you do that. Remember, this is @Tsaukpaetra we're talking about. Unless you want a forum with ponies everywhere and which requires being rebooted every half-hour or so, of course.
-
@Zerosquare It should be fine as long as we reboot him every day
-
@Zerosquare said in UI Bites:
Unless you want a forum [...] which requires being rebooted every half-hour or so
We already have a watchdoggo for that. But I'll be sure to pet it every once-in-a-while!
@Zerosquare said in UI Bites:
ponies everywhere
You must admit I haven't put ponies everwhere where I could, so it's no stretch to image I'll continue not putting ponies everywhere in the future.
-
Soon
Custom homepage is now filled with ponies.
-
I LOL'd at Vim showing up in my updates with an icon:
Also, didn't know that I had vim installed at all.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
I LOL'd at Vim showing up in my updates with an icon:
Also, didn't know that I had vim installed at all.
POSIX requires it. And I'm assuming the .deb file format includes an icon, as I've seen plenty.
-
POSIX requires it.
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim. That, or Arch Linux isn't POSIX-compliant (which in all honesty wouldn't surprise me).
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
I LOL'd at Vim showing up in my updates with an icon:
Also, didn't know that I had vim installed at all.
POSIX requires it. And I'm assuming the .deb file format includes an icon, as I've seen plenty.
Hmm...I checked on my personal machine...
which vim
turns up nothing. But...so does my work machine. Both of them do this:$ vim Command 'vim' not found, but can be installed with: sudo apt install vim sudo apt install vim-gtk3 sudo apt install vim-tiny sudo apt install neovim sudo apt install vim-athena sudo apt install vim-gtk sudo apt install vim-nox
But...
$ which vi /usr/bin/vi $ ls -ls /usr/bin/vi 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 May 24 2019 /usr/bin/vi -> /etc/alternatives/vi $ ls -l /etc/alternatives/vi lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 May 24 2019 /etc/alternatives/vi -> /usr/bin/vim.tiny
-
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.
-
POSIX requires it.
You sure?
Well, all grey-bearded UNIX admins* require it anyways, so they may as well include it by default
(* yeah I know, that's a pleonasm)
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.You missed the whole point, which is that the
vi
requirement is met by having some kind ofvim
instead.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.You missed the whole point, which is that the
vi
requirement is met by having some kind ofvim
instead.I... didn't? I was saying all along that it's
vi
command that's required by POSIX, notvim
command?
-
Status: Wondering whether I've got a downvote for being correct about Vim's status in POSIX, or shitting on grep.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.You missed the whole point, which is that the
vi
requirement is met by having some kind ofvim
instead.I... didn't? I was saying all along that it's
vi
command that's required by POSIX, notvim
command?You're doing it again.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.You missed the whole point, which is that the
vi
requirement is met by having some kind ofvim
instead.I... didn't? I was saying all along that it's
vi
command that's required by POSIX, notvim
command?No, it's because you're being dumb and missing the point that people tend to use
vim
to satisfy thevi
requirement.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.You missed the whole point, which is that the
vi
requirement is met by having some kind ofvim
instead.I... didn't? I was saying all along that it's
vi
command that's required by POSIX, notvim
command?You're doing it again.
Are you sure it's me and not your shoulder aliens? @PleegWat was talking about requirements of POSIX standard, wasn't he? I was also talking about requirements of POSIX standard. If you think I was talking about anything else than requirements of POSIX standard (and grep dumbfuckery) - especially if you think I disputed you have Vim installed on your machine, or that
vi
is a symlink pointing to Vim, or that it's an extremely common setup - well, let's just say you're not a careful reader.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.You missed the whole point, which is that the
vi
requirement is met by having some kind ofvim
instead.I... didn't? I was saying all along that it's
vi
command that's required by POSIX, notvim
command?You're doing it again.
Are you sure it's me and not your shoulder aliens? @PleegWat was talking about requirements of POSIX standard, wasn't he? I was also talking about requirements of POSIX standard. If you think I was talking about anything else than requirements of POSIX standard (and grep dumbfuckery) - especially if you think I disputed you have Vim installed on your machine or that
vi
is a symlink pointing to Vim - well, let's just say you're not a careful reader.I did mean the
vi
requirement, forgot to mention thevi
is usuallyvim-tiny
orvim-minimal
part, and when I got back here @boomzilla and you were going at it quite nicely without my help.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.You missed the whole point, which is that the
vi
requirement is met by having some kind ofvim
instead.I... didn't? I was saying all along that it's
vi
command that's required by POSIX, notvim
command?You're doing it again.
Are you sure it's me and not your shoulder aliens? @PleegWat was talking about requirements of POSIX standard, wasn't he? I was also talking about requirements of POSIX standard. If you think I was talking about anything else than requirements of POSIX standard (and grep dumbfuckery) - especially if you think I disputed you have Vim installed on your machine, or that
vi
is a symlink pointing to Vim, or that it's an extremely common setup - well, let's just say you're not a careful reader.I think that whatever you think you said according to this is different than what you actually said.
-
@boomzilla then show it. It shouldn't be too difficult to quote if you're so dead certain that I actually said any of these things.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.You missed the whole point, which is that the
vi
requirement is met by having some kind ofvim
instead.I... didn't? I was saying all along that it's
vi
command that's required by POSIX, notvim
command?No, it's because you're being dumb and missing the point that people tend to use
vim
to satisfy thevi
requirement.That's not what he said. Sure, you're absolutely right about it, but he was arguing about something else and you should know damn well he's not going to give up on that.
Why are you even having arguments with to begin with?!
-
@boomzilla then show it. It shouldn't be too difficult to quote if you're so dead certain that I actually said any of these things.
This post:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
You sure? I thought it only requires Vi, not Vim.
The general practice is to have
vi
actually bevim
. See post above.I wasn't talking about general practice (there's a lot more symlink fuckery in a typical Linux installation, such as
grep
changing its behavior depending on the filename it was executed as), I was talking about the standards. BTW, as you can see, your system doesn't have thevim
command either - which makes me even more certain it's not actually required.You missed the whole point, which is that the
vi
requirement is met by having some kind ofvim
instead.I... didn't? I was saying all along that it's
vi
command that's required by POSIX, notvim
command?No, it's because you're being dumb and missing the point that people tend to use
vim
to satisfy thevi
requirement.That's not what he said. Sure, you're absolutely right about it, but he was arguing about something else and you should know damn well he's not going to give up on that.
Why are you even having arguments with to begin with?!Sorry, not following you here. Oh, is this him saying "You don't have
vim
commandwhen it's
vim.tinyand him pretending that means I don't have
vim`?
-
@boomzilla do you know what a command is?
-
@boomzilla do you know what a command is?
Ah, so you were being retardedly literal. Thanks.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla do you know what a command is?
Ah, so you were being retardedly literal. Thanks.
But I can be more retardedly literal and point out that I have a vim command (a command that opens vim). It's just called vim.tiny.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla do you know what a command is?
Ah, so you were being retardedly literal. Thanks.
I don't think it's that retarded to know what commands the script you're writing can expect to work on other people's computers.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla do you know what a command is?
Ah, so you were being retardedly literal. Thanks.
But I can be more retardedly literal and point out that I have a vim command (a command that opens vim). It's just called vim.tiny.
I don't care what it's called or where it comes from, as long as it can be run by typing
vim
into terminal. But it can't.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla do you know what a command is?
Ah, so you were being retardedly literal. Thanks.
I don't think it's that retarded to know what commands the script you're writing can expect to work on other people's computers.
So...just use
vi
already. That's what the standard is about, right? Although...what wouldvi
be doing in a script?
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla do you know what a command is?
Ah, so you were being retardedly literal. Thanks.
But I can be more retardedly literal and point out that I have a vim command (a command that opens vim). It's just called vim.tiny.
I don't care what it's called or where it comes from, as long as it can be run by typing
vim
into terminal. But it can't.And we're back to the original retardation.
vim
isn't guaranteed to be there.vi
is, so dude.
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla do you know what a command is?
Ah, so you were being retardedly literal. Thanks.
I don't think it's that retarded to know what commands the script you're writing can expect to work on other people's computers.
So...just use
vi
already. That's what the standard is about, right? Although...what wouldvi
be doing in a script?Whatever it's doing (asking to fill in some file template?), it should probably be
${EDITOR:-vi}
instead.
-
@boomzilla then show it. It shouldn't be too difficult to quote if you're so dead certain that I actually said any of these things.
status: goddammit not this shit again...
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
Sorry, not following you here. Oh, is this him saying "You don't have
vim
commandwhen it's
vim.tinyand him pretending that means I don't have
vim`?@boomzilla do you know what a command is?
Obviously not - look at all those backtics!
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in UI Bites:
@boomzilla then show it. It shouldn't be too difficult to quote if you're so dead certain that I actually said any of these things.
status: goddammit not this shit again...
I know right! If only @boomzilla learned to read properly!
-
@levicki dude, I was on his ignore list before you signed up here.
-
@Zerosquare said in UI Bites:
Yeah... you may want to think twice before you do that. Remember, this is @Tsaukpaetra we're talking about. Unless you want a forum with ponies everywhere and which requires being rebooted every half-hour or so, of course.
- @Tsaukpaetra edited your post -
- "read" -
-
@Zerosquare said in UI Bites:
Yeah... you may want to think twice before you do that. Remember, this is @Tsaukpaetra we're talking about. Unless you want a forum with ponies everywhere and which requires being rebooted every half-hour or so, of course.
- @Tsaukpaetra edited your post -
- "read" -
would that be better or worse than upvotes?
-
@boomzilla said in UI Bites:
@levicki dude, I was on his ignore list before you signed up here.
You should all do what I do: Simply ignore everything someone says and massively take it out of context!
... what.
-
@Zerosquare said in UI Bites:
Yeah... you may want to think twice before you do that. Remember, this is @Tsaukpaetra we're talking about. Unless you want a forum with ponies everywhere and which requires being rebooted every half-hour or so, of course.
- @Tsaukpaetra edited your post -
- "read" -
Wow, that got mangled. Looked quite nice in the composer
-
@levicki said in UI Bites:
You should all do what I do: Simply ignore everything someone says and massively take it out of context!
... what.
Are you, by any chance, Gąska's alt? Because that's exactly what he does.
No, we're all @boomzilla
Pay attention.
-
Wow, that got mangled. Looked quite nice in the composer
Yeah, it should more have been:
------------------------------------------- - @Tsaukpaetra edited your post - - "read" - -------------------------------------------