Did I banned?
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Did I banned?:
@Lorne-Kates said in Did I banned?:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Did I banned?:
@Lorne-Kates said in Did I banned?:
raping The Little Mermaid is banned
How does that work? Fish don't work like that...
- Wait for a fish to lay her eggs
- Swim and ask permission to fertilize them
- when she says no, jizz all over the place anyways
Fish rape.
Wow. I wonder what their SJWs are like...
Dunno, but their JWs are like this:
-
@Lorne-Kates You sound like Raymond Chen all of a sudden.
-
@boomzilla I'm pretty sure the NRA is worried there's a 100% chance that will be addressed.
-
@Captain said in Did I banned?:
@boomzilla I'm pretty sure the NRA is worried there's a 100% chance that will be addressed.
Oh, do they have a stake in gangs and the destruction of families and inner city economies? I wasn't aware.
-
@FrostCat said in Did I banned?:
@Lorne-Kates You sound like Raymond Chen all of a sudden.
@Lorne-Kates is an alt of Raymond Chen confirmed!
-
@FrostCat said in Did I banned?:
@Lorne-Kates You sound like Raymond Chen all of a sudden.
That's sexist.
-
@boomzilla Of course they do. Their product makes it into the hands of gangs in inner cities, and is a cause of death.
Also, suicides by white people. And murders by white people. Which are relevant to the discussion and much more common than your comments indicate.
-
@Lorne-Kates said in Did I banned?:
That's sexist.
How so? I've never heard Raymond's voice, as far as you know. He might sound feminine. If anyone's being sexist, _you_are towards Raymond.
-
@Captain said in Did I banned?:
Of course they do. Their product makes it into the hands of gangs in inner cities, and is a cause of death.
So the solution isn't to still doing the stuff that screwed them over but instead try to make then change tools?
Yes, it's that sort of awful analysis that would be a disservice.
-
@FrostCat said in Did I banned?:
@Lorne-Kates said in Did I banned?:
That's sexist.
How so? I've never heard Raymond's voice, as far as you know. He might sound feminine. If anyone's being sexist, _you_are towards Raymond.
I have been properly shamed. I will now commit SJWppuku
-
@Lorne-Kates said in Did I banned?:
@FrostCat said in Did I banned?:
@Lorne-Kates You sound like Raymond Chen all of a sudden.
That's sexist.
So you sound more like Raymonda Chen?
-
@boomzilla or maybe there should be some research done so there are more facts and fewer people spouting their opinions as gospel truth
What were we talking about again?
-
@Luhmann said in Did I banned?:
So you sound more like Raymonda Chen?
Raymond married someone with almost the same name as him? Fucking egotistical wanker
-
Hey! HEY!
The Guncamole thread is
-
@Lorne-Kates said in Did I banned?:
you can do just about anything with it.
The only limit is your imagination.
Also,while Little Mermaid is post op trans, she's not a hooker in any version I've read. Invite to WTDWTF denied.
-
@Maciejasjmj said in Did I banned?:
she's not a hooker in any version I've read.
But she works that pole like no other!
-
-
@Jaloopa said in Did I banned?:
Fucking egotistical wanker
You think that's bad? Never look up what George Foreman named his kids.
-
-
@Maciejasjmj said in Did I banned?:
@Luhmann said in Did I banned?:
works that pole
Those are baseless accusations.
Next up: Duda states, "I did not have sex with that mermaid".
-
@ScholRLEA said in Did I banned?:
@Maciejasjmj said in Did I banned?:
@Luhmann said in Did I banned?:
works that pole
Those are baseless accusations.
Next up: Duda states, "I did not have sex with that mermaid".
Technically correct.
-
@Captain said in Did I banned?:
@boomzilla said in Did I banned?:
@Captain said in Did I banned?:
@boomzilla I'm pretty sure the NRA is worried there's a 100% chance that will be addressed.
Oh, do they have a stake in gangs and the destruction of families and inner city economies? I wasn't aware.
@boomzilla Of course they do. Their product makes it into the hands of gangs in inner cities, and is a cause of death.
TIL
The NRA makes guns and ammunition.@Captain is an idiot.
-
@abarker Yeah, because manufacturers aren't the biggest contributors to their industry PAC...
The NRA gets less than half its funding from membership dues. The rest -- the majority, mind you -- comes straight from the gun manufacturing industry.
-
@Captain Obvious to the rescue. Yes, it's almost like gun manufacturers want people to buy their products or something. Yet you somehow managed to utterly fail to connect either the gun industry or the NRA to inner city gangs and death.
-
@anotherusername What are you even talking about? The NRA petitioned the Republican party to block the CDC study in 1993. Nobody knows what the results of that study will be until it is done.
-
@Captain The CDC is still banned from publishing their anti-gun propaganda under the name of study, yes.
They have Kellerman to thank for that.
-
@anotherusername If you think the American Medical Association and the CDC are acting in bad faith, say so instead of pretending that we all agree their studies are "propaganda".
Also, prove it.
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/news/news/2016/2016-06-14-gun-violence-lobby-congress.page
-
-
@anotherusername Definitely, since the article undermines your "point".
CDC very recently released a 16-page report that was commissioned by the city council of Wilmington, Delaware, on factors contributing to its abnormally high gun crime, and methods of prevention. The study weighed factors such as where the guns were coming from, the sex of the offenders, likeliness of committing a gun crime, and how unemployment plays a factor. In other words it studied, the environment surrounding the crime.
This did not go over well with some in the media, who were disappointed it didn’t implicate firearms as a cause and not an effect. Kate Masters of VICE.com wrote, “If the CDC wasn’t going to consider the role of firearms in Wilmington’s gun crimes, why do the study at all?” That sounds an awful lot like, “If you have nothing bad to say about guns, then don’t say anything.”
It sounds more like ... a research study than propaganda.
Also, the Kellerman study showed a simple fact: you are 2.7 times more likely to die from a homicide if there's a gun in your home.
It's a simple statistic. If somebody you trusted told you that, would that sound like a good thing to you?
The nice thing about science is that you can ignore the "language" the writer uses and check the statistic yourself.
-
@Captain said in Did I banned?:
Also, the Kellerman study showed a simple fact: you are 2.7 times more likely to die from a homicide if there's a gun in your home.
That study was pretty thoroughly debunked, too, so it's kind of telling that you're citing it. You might as well cite Andrew Wakefield's "immunizations cause autism" study, although at least The Lancet had the basic sense of shame to retract it eventually.
-
@FrostCat That's not the consensus among doctors or statisticians. Just a loud minority of gun activists.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457502000490
-
@Captain "furthermore, the gun victims he studied were anomalies. They were selected from homicide victims living in metropolitan areas with high gun-crime statistics, which completely discounted the statistical goliath of areas where gun owners engage in little to no crime.
Other factors that lent to the study’s unreliability were: It is based entirely on people murdered in their homes, with 50 percent admitting this was the result of a “quarrel or romantic triangle,” and 30 percent said it was during a drug deal or other felonies such as rape or burglary; it made no consideration for guns used in self-defense; it provided no proof or examples that the murder weapon used in these crimes belonged to the homeowner or had been kept in that home."
The plain fact is if you aren't living in the inner city you're not much more likely to get shot to death than if you lived in Europe.
-
@Lorne-Kates said in Did I banned?:
One plug-in later, and user "rape culture" who was posting about raping The Little Mermaid is banned.
Why do you hate free speech?
-
-
did i banned
-
@Captain said in Did I banned?:
@FrostCat That's not the consensus among doctors or statisticians. Just a loud minority of gun activists.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457502000490
If I had to take a wild-assed guess, I would guess that every single one of those just refers back to the bogus study by Kellerman.
-
@anotherusername Yeah, that's a wild ass guess. They all did their own surveying. And it all broadly agrees with Kellermann.
Also, let's consider that:
So many people die annually from gunfire in the US that the death toll between 1968 and 2011 eclipses all wars ever fought by the country. According to research by Politifact, there were about 1.4 million firearm deaths in that period, compared with 1.2 million US deaths in every conflict from the War of Independence to Iraq.
-
@FrostCat That's cool and all, but that's not what the Kellermann study did. That's what right wingers say the Kellermann study did.
As a matter of fact, it was a case-control study where similar households in the same neighborhoods were used as controls. There was no a priori selection of the control houses -- it was all done by randomized selection. This means that Kellermann can compare the rates of death in a specific population (the gun-death households) to similar populations (the other homes in the neighborhood, which might or might not have been gun owners).
Your resistance to facts is revealing. You're like a girl -- it's all about how it feels. And since it feels that your gun makes you safer, logic and sanity goes out the window. "Knowledge" by sound-bite.
-
Derp.
https://himmelfarb.gwu.edu/tutorials/studydesign101/casecontrols.html
A study that compares patients who have a disease or outcome of interest (cases) with patients who do not have the disease or outcome (controls), and looks back retrospectively to compare how frequently the exposure to a risk factor is present in each group to determine the relationship between the risk factor and the disease.
Case control studies are observational because no intervention is attempted and no attempt is made to alter the course of the disease. The goal is to retrospectively determine the exposure to the risk factor of interest from each of the two groups of individuals: cases and controls. These studies are designed to estimate odds.
-
@Captain What should be going out the window is the concept of safety itself. It simply doesn't exist in the real world, no matter how well armed one is.
-
@anotherusername @abarker please direct your gun licking to the guns thread
-
@Captain said in Did I banned?:
They all did their own surveying. And it all broadly agrees with Kellermann.
Then I'd have to say that they probably all had the same deliberate flaws in their data gathering methods that forced their to data agree with their anti-gun bias.
-
@anotherusername Reality has an anti-gun bias
-
@anotherusername yes, that must literally be the only possible explanation for a study disagreeing with what you think reality should be like
-
@groo said in Did I banned?:
@anotherusername @abarker please direct your gun licking to the guns thread
Geeze, I make one comment about how the NRA doesn't make guns, and I get called out for "gun licking".
@groo: take a look at who's actually arguing before you shove your foot in your mouth again.
-
@abarker It's not just one comment if you don't take your "MOD" badge out while doing it.
-
-
@Captain said in Did I banned?:
Also, let's consider that:
Yes, let's. And then let's consider what I already said, which is a well-known fact, that if you don't live in the inner city, you're likelihood of getting shot is vanishingly small, yet those yahoos all pretend that's an overall risk.
-
@Captain said in Did I banned?:
You're like a girl
When you don't have an argument, attack the other side!
-
@groo said in Did I banned?:
please direct your gun licking to the guns thread
this one is apparently for licking paint chips.