What kind of Docker container reads thedailywtf.com? (with apologies to Playboy's circulatory dept. circa 1972)
-
(joke ruined by overuse, will be automatically become funny again in 2 months unless flagged)
-
(post withdrawn by system, address /t/51834/102 was not stack'd, malloc'd, or (recently) free'd)
-
(I have preyed upon your post; pray that I don't prey upon it further)
-
lo finti cu vimcu lo vlamei .i revo lo cacra temci caku lo nu lo vlamei cu canci
-
(post withdrawn by the authors will be automatically deleted in 24 hours, except in cases already reported)
-
(post flankenirante aŭtoro, estos aŭtomate forigita en 24 horoj se flagged)
-
(post withdrawn as it's no longer needed for @presidentsdaughter, will be automatically deleted from embedded filesystem unless unbanned from your daddy and mommy's modem by Bert Glanstrom)
Filed under: FPMTFY
-
(post withdrawn by author, because Lyle can write a better one)
-
(PostNotFound)
-
(this post has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down)
-
(Beitrag von Verfasser zurückgezogen, wird automatisch innerhalb von 24 DiskoStunden, es sei denn gekennzeichneten gelöscht werden)
DTFY
-
-
(This post has requested the Runtime to terminate Discourse in an unusual way)
-
(This post has requested the Runtime to terminate Jeff in an unusual way)
-
(Post has been mediated by author, will be framed in 24 hours unless secured)
-
(Discourse withdrawn by author, will be deleted in 24 hours unless .)
-
HOVERCRAFT_ERROR_EELS_NOT_FOUND
(I'll give you 'more descriptive', DiscHorse!)
-
(This post cannot connect to the Internet. You may be able to resolve this problem by connecting to the Internet and searching for help)
-
504 OK!
<Horse cocks. Is that "descriptive" enough?
-
(This post is a spoiler, and will be withdrawn unless [spoiler]flagged by Luke's father[/spoiler])
-
(Instead of automatically downloading the developer will be removed for am 12: 0)
filed under: bad translation is discoursey
-
Status: Was tabbing through Chrome with narrator and I heard it pronounce this window's title as "Does anyone still bellgium thedailywtf.com?". Was disappointed when I discovered that the censorship plugin doesn't censor Window titles too.
Filed under: Huh, Discourse saved my post from two days ago. Weird.
-
@antiquarian said:
You voluntarily passed on an almost-guaranteed pendantry ? YMBNH
These aren't the you are looking for
This is a really late reply, but......
Uh, technically you're talking about one (a noun in the singular form), so.... It would be "This isn't the you're looking for". This is due to the fact that properly singular nouns in the English language are not referred to with "These", but instead with "This". In addition, the second word would need to become "isn't", not "aren't", for similar reasons.
Unfortunately, that ruins the quote, but we must have precision of language, dammit!
-
Wait there's still a main site?
There is! I seem to have muted Articles by way of the Kurobar shenanigans. I might have to catch up on the WTF but I feel I contributed my fair share in the Lounge by now
-
This is a really late reply, but......
Uh, technically you're talking about one (a noun in the singular form), so.... It would be "This isn't the you're looking for". This is due to the fact that properly singular nouns in the English language are not referred to with "These", but instead with "This". In addition, the second word would need to become "isn't", not "aren't", for similar reasons.
Unfortunately, that ruins the quote, but we must have precision of language, dammit!
But it's so easily fixed:
These aren't the you are looking for
-
I read the emoticon as one-to-many depending on the context, seeing how they pop up in the original animation. Duplicating would hence be overkill.
-
I read the emoticon as one-to-many depending on the context, seeing how they pop up in the original animation. Duplicating would hence be overkill.
That clip explains so much I never knew about . (Nope, never saw it before.)
Nevertheless, it makes it clear there can never be too many
And @sloosecannon, you were incorrectly pendantic.
-
These aren't the <img src="https://what.thedailywtf.com/uploads/default/_emoji/badger.gif?v=0" class="emoji" title=:badgers:"> you are looking for.
-
I feel I contributed my fair share in the Lounge by now
Really? You too? Am I the only poster who is not allowed admittance to the lounge?
It's like that time when I peed on the night club floor and they said I wasn't allowed back in
-
Am I the only poster who is not allowed admittance to the lounge?
If @shadowmod were working you could ask why you're not TL3 yet.
-
Am I the only poster who is not allowed admittance to the lounge?
No. A certain rat refuses to meet the criteria for admittance.
-
If @shadowmod were working you could ask why you're not TL3 yet.
I did check the FAQ and I must be missing something(?) cos I can't see how anyone (who has a job and/or family) could keep up with this TL3 requirement;
- read at least a quarter of the posts created in the past 100 days
-
If @shadowmod were working you could ask why you're not TL3 yet.
He works for that.
@shadowmod trust skotl
-
username: skotl trust level: 2 (Not locked) In the last 100: Visits: 34/50 Topics Replied To: 47/10 Topics Viewed: 342/262 Total Topics Viewed: 520/200 Posts Read: 91213/22955 Total Posts Read: 96428/500 Flagged Posts: 0/5 (max) Flagged By: 0/5 (max) Likes Given: 146/30 Likes Received: 332/20 Liked on Days: 37/7 Liked by users: 79/5 Status: Below requirements.
-
username: skotl
trust level: 2 (Not locked)In the last 100:
Visits: 34/50
Topics Replied To: 47/10
Topics Viewed: 342/262
Total Topics Viewed: 520/200
Posts Read: 91213/22955
Total Posts Read: 96428/500
Flagged Posts: 0/5 (max)
Flagged By: 0/5 (max)
Likes Given: 146/30
Likes Received: 332/20
Liked on Days: 37/7
Liked by users: 79/5Status: Below requirements.
Cheers for that. Now what am I looking at? Or, if I was a status-chasing pleb (which I am) what needs to be increased to be TL3?
Edit: Ah! Got it, I think. The left number is my "achievement" and the right is the target.
Must try harder :)
-
So wait, you're supposed to have flagged posts?
And here I thought that was a bad thing.
-
Must try harder
Basically, you just need 16 more days of showing up.
And here I thought that was a bad thing.
-
I'm guessing that's a reporting syntax glitch, rather than a target.
The FAQ says;
- must not have been reported (and confirmed by a mod) for 5 spam and/or offensive posts. (Criteria for this is: 5 flags by 5 different users on 5 different posts - specifically: you could fail this by at least 5 flags being submitted.)
-
-
must not have been reported (and confirmed by a mod) for 5 spam and/or offensive posts. (Criteria for this is: 5 flags by 5 different users on 5 different posts - specifically: you could fail this by at least 5 flags being submitted.)
Could that be phrased more confusingly? No, no it could not have been.
I'm guessing what that actually means is:
Have fewer than X flagged posts, or have been flagged by fewer than X different people.
But I'm not even clear on that. (If a single nutcase flags 57 of your posts, does that disqualify you? Or does it have to be 5 flags by 5 distinct users?)
Whoever put the "things you must have less of" in the same list as the "things you must have more of" is an idiot. Who wrote that bot? Oh. Right. Hm.
-
The reporting is the least problematic thing here.
-
must not have been reported (and confirmed by a mod) for 5 spam and/or offensive posts. (Criteria for this is: 5 flags by 5 different users on 5 different posts - specifically: you could fail this by at least 5 flags being submitted.)
So, flags for restoring deleted posts doesn't count?
-
So, flags for restoring deleted posts doesn't count?
The staff here defer them, so no, they don't.
-
Posts Read: 91213/22955
Hmmmm.... I think I'd dispute that I have read 91,213 posts in the last 100 days...
Good old dicsource - opaque as ever
-
"read" means "marked as read".
I don't actually read any of the posts around here. Especially not the ones I reply to.
-
That explains a lot!
-
"read" means "marked as read".
I don't actually read any of the posts around here. Especially not the ones I reply to.
At least you admit it, unlike certain other people around here...
-
But I'm not even clear on that. (If a single nutcase flags 57 of your posts, does that disqualify you? Or does it have to be 5 flags by 5 distinct users?)
I think being flagged by too many people is one disqualifier and having too many posts flagged is another. Multiple people could be flagging the same posts. But the flags also need to be approved / agreed to by a moderator for them to count against that tally.
-
I did check the FAQ and I must be missing something(?) cos I can't see how anyone (who has a job and/or family) could keep up with this TL3 requirement;
read at least a quarter of the posts created in the past 100 days
- Go to /t/1000.
- Hit PgDn once a minute for a couple of hours.
1001000100101010010. Exit /t/1000.
At least, that's what I did...
-
Whoever put the "things you must have less of" in the same list as the "things you must have more of" is an idiot. Who wrote that bot? Oh. Right. Hm.
Those are Discurse rules, not shadowmod's rules. If you don't like the rule wording you should take it up with Jeff.