Internet of shit
-
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
. It is essentially an orc ass-sized monitor
Sorry, I'm not into big asses.
I have trouble believing this, considering that stag-ass posted over .
-
@topspin said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
. It is essentially an orc ass-sized monitor
Sorry, I'm not into big asses.
I have trouble believing this, considering that stag-ass posted over .
I posted art of a person I followed, not that it was a typical example of things I'm into.
Puts the NSFW in context, eh?
-
I'm glad I'm not the only one making emojis that you can't wtf they are without the title
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
. It is essentially an orc ass-sized monitor
Sorry, I'm not into big asses.
I somehow find that unlikely.....
are we sure you're really you?
-
@Vixen said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
. It is essentially an orc ass-sized monitor
Sorry, I'm not into big asses.
I somehow find that unlikely.....
are we sure you're really you?
Asses are fine, just not ones I'd have to measure volume by gallons.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
. It is essentially an orc ass-sized monitor
Sorry, I'm not into big asses.
So for you it is: ponies, yes; donkeys, no?
-
@dkf said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
. It is essentially an orc ass-sized monitor
Sorry, I'm not into big asses.
So for you it is: ponies, yes; donkeys, no?
There are exceptions, naturally
but I did say big asses.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
Sorry, I'm not into big asses.
@topspin said in Internet of shit:
I have trouble believing this
@Tsaukpaetra doesn't like big butts, why would he lie?
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
Asses are fine, just not ones I'd have to measure volume by gallons.
What about a butt?
-
@loopback0 said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
Asses are fine, just not ones I'd have to measure volume by gallons.
What about a butt?
I have no use for that much lube, so no thanks... Everything in moderation!
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
@loopback0 said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
Asses are fine, just not ones I'd have to measure volume by gallons.
What about a butt?
I have no use for that much lube, so no thanks... Everything in moderation!
-
@topspin said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
@loopback0 said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
Asses are fine, just not ones I'd have to measure volume by gallons.
What about a butt?
I have no use for that much lube, so no thanks... Everything in moderation!
Butt I repeat myself.
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra You do not measure asses -- asses measure you.
Naturally. Doesn't stop me from disapproving of them.
-
-
@JBert @error_bot xkcd sex workout
-
xkcd said in https://xkcd.com/940/ :
Oversight
Â(via https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?search=sex+workout&title=Special%3ASearch&fulltext=1)
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra Liar, there is no such thing as too big of an ass (except when talking about people and not body parts).
That's like, your opinion, man.
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra Liar, there is no such thing as too big of an ass (except when talking about people and not body parts).
Yes. Yes there is. You can probably find some in the Fat Shaming thread, but I'm not going to look. It's bedtime, and I don't want to trigger any nightmares.
-
-
@Deadfast said in Internet of shit:
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
G-SYNC
You mean FreeSync.
Aren't they both the same now? Or so someone on the Internet told me, anyways.
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
Free to me implies free-running which means no sync at all
-
@Zerosquare said in Internet of shit:
I didn't think there was anything @Tsaukpaetra wasn't into. You learn something new every day.
Anything :@levicki: says.
-
@boomzilla Does this mean @Tsaukpaetra is or isn't into Instagram Sluts?
-
@topspin said in Internet of shit:
@boomzilla Does this mean @Tsaukpaetra is or isn't into Instagram Sluts?
IIRC my position was that I could not find any sluts on Instagram.
@Tsaukpaetra said in Instagram is LinkedIn for sluts:
@levicki said in Instagram is LinkedIn for sluts:
And if you just want to ogle hot chicks, read this.
No female-presenting-nipples to be found. Oh well...
Ah, yep.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
@Deadfast said in Internet of shit:
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
G-SYNC
You mean FreeSync.
Aren't they both the same now? Or so someone on the Internet told me, anyways.
Well yeah, they are the same. Except Nvidia said FreeSync sucks, made their own thing, realised their own thing sucks, adopted FreeSync and somehow they still get to slap their own logo on it.
-
-
Remember, the "S" in "IoT" stands for "Security".
-
@lolwhat said in Internet of shit:
As one researcher complained to the site: âThey are worth billions so where is the investment in security.â
-
@levicki Now your Ring password hack can get access to your Google assistant and your Philips Hue lights all at once!
-
@levicki Let me leverage this quote from the article:
The second development is that Google has a second blog post on CHIP with some more details. Google talked a bit about security, saying that by leveraging the tried-and-true Internet protocol (IP) CHIP will enable "direct, private and secure end-to-end communications among devices, mobiles, and cloud services with a familiar and consistent development and programming model making it easier for developers to leverage their experience and solutions across those domains. This approach reduces points of attack and weakness where security would otherwise be terminated and reinitiated."
It uses IP, guys. It's secure!
Filed under: but does it use frames to securely mediate?
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
You kid, but this part about Ring camera owners tells you a lot about how stupid they are:
News of these lists follows a week of individual stories from actual camera owners who complained to reporters that theyâd been harassed in their homes by mysterious voices emanating from their Ring devices. Some owners had, very unwisely, installed them in their childrenâs bedrooms.
WHO THE FUCK WOULD PUT OUTOORS DOORBELL CAMERA INSIDE THE HOUSE LET ALONE IN A CHILD'S BEDROOM?!?
Ring sells indoor cameras as well, with a use case of keeping tabs on and communicating with your family.
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
it takes a special kind of idiot to install a camera in a child's bedroom. Imagine having a parent which doesn't give you even a modicum of privacy like that.
I read that part as referring to small children, babies, etc. â not teenagers.
Though I donât doubt there are indeed people who put cameras in the rooms of older children without telling them. Some may have a good reason to do so, some probably not.
-
@lolwhat said in Internet of shit:
That guy's entire article is "Ring didn't try hard enough to stop the stupid people from doing something stupid and reusing passwords, so it's their fault these people got hacked"
Laying aside for a moment the implications of that.. what's a reasonable way to do that? You could use a service like pwned passwords, I guess, but there's no way to check if a password is the same if it's not in a breach somewhere. Even if it is, if you're storing passwords properly you can only check that on login or password change, and while it's not unreasonable to do that, it's definitely above industry standard and not doing that doesn't somehow make Ring some kind of bad guys here.
Forced 2fa could help too, although there's a good chance there are a fair number of customers that'll bitch about that too, maybe even leading to less sales. At that point it's a trade-off...
-
This post is deleted!
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
@Gurth said in Internet of shit:
I read that part as referring to small children, babies, etc. â not teenagers.
So an 8 year old girl in your mind is not entitled to some privacy?
Did I mention ages other than âteenagersâ? FYI, I had toddlers and children of nursery-school age in mind when I wrote âsmall childrenâ there.
Only teenagers? That's a horrible thought. IMO, if you haven't established trust with your child at that age and need to keep an eye on them at all times, then you have already failed as a parent and cameras everywhere won't save them from themselves.
You are making all kinds of assumptions about me here. Again FYI, last summer a friend of mine remarked (in a conversation that had turned to tracking bracelets and similar technology) that she wouldnât mind one of those for her nearly-8-year-old daughter. Her reason was apparently that the girl liked playing in the houses that were under construction around where they live, and the mother was anxious that something might happen to her there, so with one of those bracelets she would be able to keep an eye on her. My reply to this could be summed up as, âWTF?! Leave her be!â â but delivered a bit more diplomatically than that. (Her: âI wouldnât want her to fall on her head and end up disabled or something.â Me: âOr you could see it as you ending up as the mother of a Paralympian medalist!â)
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
Construction sites are not the place for children games.
And she apparently acknowledges that. However, she also intends to not train her children on avoiding hazards, instead replacing it with a digital fence.
-
@Parody said in Internet of shit:
Plug it into standard outlets for nonstop power and peace of mind.
Unless your outlets are powered by PG&E.
-
@HardwareGeek said in Internet of shit:
@Parody said in Internet of shit:
Plug it into standard outlets for nonstop power and peace of mind.
Unless your outlets are powered by PG&E.
I don't think Ring can do much about that. There are, however, plenty of places in the US without PG&E.
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
So instead of sitting down with the kid, explaining the dangers of houses under construction, and finding something more productive for her to do, she wants to tag the kid with a bracelet so she gets an alert on her phone when the kid inevitably gets herself in a wheelchair or worse?
I think you are exaggerating. Yes, there would be a risk of that happening, but that risk is also there when crossing a street. Do people stop crossing the street?
Construction sites are not the place for children games.
One of my pretty early memories, I must have been six years old or so, is playing in or near houses under construction â and this was long before they put fences around those like they do today. Houses under construction are great playgrounds, just as long as you remember not to do something stupid like get too close to edges.
-
bUt It'S jUsT bAd UsEr PaSsWoRdS
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
So an 8 year old girl in your mind is not entitled to some privacy?
When an 8 year old me got some privacy, he started an open fire in the middle of the room. Luckily, the only damage was to the carpet. So even if I don't necessarily approve, at the very least I understand the sentiment.
-
@levicki said in Internet of shit:
I'd say there is a tiny little difference between those two actions and their associated risks:
Of course. My point is that people are too afraid things will happen in places with obvious danger but often not enough in places with equal or greater danger that they visit regularly. IOW: they donât see the danger theyâre accustomed to.
What about the risk of someone just kidnapping a girl playing alone on an unguarded construction site with no eye-witnesses who can help find her?
If this was something that happens around these parts, I would agree with you. I cannot, however, recall any such thing occurring at all.
âBut that doesnât mean it wonât happen, possibly in the near future!â Yes, and it also doesnât mean that it will. If you have to guard against everything that could possibly happen, youâre probably better off killing yourself so you donât have to worry about all of the bad things anymore.
Your childhood story is an example of survivor bias.
No kid in my area ever died or got any serious injuries from playing in these kinds of places. If everyone is a survivor, is the danger really that great?
-
@GÄ ska said in Internet of shit:
When an 8 year old me got some privacy
He infected the main computer with about 30 worms and viruses (luckily not the hardware-damaging kind).
Fun times...
Edit: nowadays the computer just fucks itself up... No need to install things....
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
No need to install things....
Didnât stop you from spending all your time installing things. Again and again.
-
@topspin said in Internet of shit:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Internet of shit:
No need to install things....
Didnât stop you from spending all your time installing things. Again and again.
"I'm not addicted!"
Edit: Sorry, quoted wrong....
-
@GÄ ska said in Internet of shit:
When an 8 year old me got some privacy, he started an open fire in the middle of the room.
I had no idea you were @Polygeekery's son.
-
@Zerosquare said in Internet of shit:
@GÄ ska said in Internet of shit:
When an 8 year old me got some privacy, he started an open fire in the middle of the room.
I had no idea you were @Polygeekery's son.
@Polygeekery, you old dog!
-
@lolwhat said in Internet of shit:
@Zerosquare said in Internet of shit:
@GÄ ska said in Internet of shit:
When an 8 year old me got some privacy, he started an open fire in the middle of the room.
I had no idea you were @Polygeekery's son.
@Polygeekery, you old dog!
Some hot Polish affair, who can blame him.
-
@topspin said in Internet of shit:
@lolwhat said in Internet of shit:
@Zerosquare said in Internet of shit:
@GÄ ska said in Internet of shit:
When an 8 year old me got some privacy, he started an open fire in the middle of the room.
I had no idea you were @Polygeekery's son.
@Polygeekery, you old dog!
Some hot Polish affair, who can blame him.
Must be that they got on like a house on fire.