So, I'm going to nominate @wharrgarbl as my strong and stable
Any particular reason you are choosing him instead of @sloosecannon?
spammy post would be unnoticed
Which seems counterproductive if you consider the point of spam. It seems posting spam is some kind of art form: you want it to be noticed by as many people as possible, as long as those people aren't mods
I think it ended up in a category that doesn't show for Google so it would fly under the radar,
Yes, it makes complete sense to put your advertisement somewhere where Google can't find it. If only more ads operated this way.
as the fascists are...one of me/@Yamikuronue.
Did I miss something?
if we remove the suspects and the previous government that is ineligible, you have either me or @sloosecannon
Agreed. And based purely on the policy enactment history, @sloosecannon has passed L while we have no evidence on @wharrgarbl, so @sloosecannon would seem the safer choice. But a case could also be made for @wharrgarbl seeing that he is next in line to be president.
Well well, interesting turn of events. I got passed FF.
But rather than this turning into a he said/he said argument, I agree with @Maciejasjmj:
All in all it probably is - we know one of @Weng, and @Vault_Dweller is a fascist, so now we're only dealing with a single fascist + Hitler among 5 people instead of 2 fascists + Hitler among 7, giving us slightly better odds.
Moving on to the nomination. My main concern is I will in all probability be passed as president, and if the next outcome is Fascist as well @Yamikuronue would potentially be passed as well, meaning we would have 2 passes in a row, and if @sloosecannon is a fascist it could be a potential problem.
Well, my suspicions from earlier want me to test Vault_Dweller.
The suspicions based on incorrect information? Obviously I have no issue with you picking me, I'm just questioning your reasoning
Why are you against dice?
it gives us nothing on the voter.
I have to agree with @Maciejasjmj here. You are too focused on the fact that we gain no information about the chancellor, but you are not taking into consideration that we are gaining something on the president
@Yamikuronue Fair enough
Now you have two data points: Sloose is in favor of our current turn order, and I am in favor of pure randomness for safety. Make of that what you will.
That would depend on the outcome of the legislative session. If the outcome is Fascist then you would look a lot less suspicious. If not then there are various possibilities.
Looks like your connection to What the Daily WTF? was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.