a whole lotta nothing, only $5
-
@FrostCat said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
He'd have to have a sex change operation first. Don't tell @fox I said that.
Necessary, but not sufficient.
-
@HardwareGeek said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Aaaannndd, I'm outta here.
This is what was a bridge too far?
-
@HardwareGeek said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Necessary, but not sufficient.
Right. Forgot to specify "the boob job has to be at least a D cup".
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
@bb36e said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Is this now the Blakey / frostcat thread?
I ship this so hard!
Pay @Yamikuronue $10/mo and she might write fanfic for you.
Filed under: Probably not, but lets create shipnames!
That's gonna provide limited options, because blakeycat's already taken.
-
@FrostCat said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
That's gonna provide limited options, because blakeycat's already taken.
Frostyrat?
-
@FrostCat said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
He'd have to have a sex change operation first.
See, told you it works.
-
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
See, told you it works.
You ready to give a transman cunnilingus yet?
-
@FrostCat said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
See, told you it works.
You ready to give a transman cunnilingus yet?
Is it any different than giving a transwoman a blowjob?
Asking for Engine, because it can't talk (barred after circumstances).
-
@FrostCat I think you missed the part in where I posted links to trans people who had not had SRS to demonstrate to certain other forumgoers that trans people can still be attractive. I found the trans man quite attractive, and said so; I would indeed be willing to give it a try with him.
Specifically, this guy:
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Is it any different than giving a transwoman a blowjob?
For a number of reasons, yes. The technique, I imagine, is entirely different, for one.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Is it any different than giving a transwoman a blowjob?
Yes, because I doubt fox would have a problem with that, but [see for rest of this post].
-
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
I would indeed be willing to give it a try with him.
Specifically PIV? I'm trying to work out the contours here.
INB4
-
@FrostCat Hell, I'd probably have an easier time doing that than cunnilingus with him.
On the other hand, I have no desire to sleep with this woman:
-
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
I have no desire to sleep with this woman:
What if she were an actual hermaphrodite?
-
@FrostCat You mean if she were intersex?
-
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
You mean if she were intersex?
I'm not going to play word games. I didn't mean the word pejoratively.
-
@FrostCat Okay, well, what did you mean, then, because people who do mean it perjoratively have muddied its meaning to the point that I'm not sure what it means to you is what I know its original meaning was.
-
I think I liked this thread more when it wasn't about who @Fox would like to bang.
I'd like to bang Emma Watson, and no one seems to care.
-
@Maciejasjmj Well @FrostCat seems to care about who I would like to bang. I'm sure there's someone out there who cares about who you'd like to bang, too. There are plenty of fish in the sea.
-
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
I'm sure there's someone out there who cares about who you'd like to bang, too.
And I have to make sure she'll never find out.
Filed under: if you're reading this, honey, I was totally joking about Emma
-
@Maciejasjmj said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Filed under: if you're reading this, honey, I was totally joking about Emma
Her name was actually Amme.
-
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Okay, well, what did you mean, then, because people who do mean it perjoratively have muddied its meaning to the point that I'm not sure what it means to you is what I know its original meaning was.
Someone with both sets of sexual organs, that is, the original/biological meaning.
-
@Maciejasjmj said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
I'd like to bang Emma Watson, and no one seems to care.
Who wouldn't?
I'm kind of rolling my eyes even asking this here, but presumably even a gay guy would do her from behind.
-
-
@Maciejasjmj said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
And I have to make sure she'll never find out.
That's probably not going to be an issue as long as you didn't send her letters.
-
@FrostCat Okay. Still, no, I would have no desire to bang her. I like masculinity.
-
@FrostCat said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
@Maciejasjmj said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
I'd like to bang Emma Watson, and no one seems to care.
Who wouldn't?
I'm kind of rolling my eyes even asking this here, but presumably even a gay guy would do her from behind.
Prooobably not. If I were to go straight for a woman... I don't even know who it would be. I can't think of any famous women I'd like to sleep with.
-
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
If I were to go straight for a woman
Actually that wasn't what I meant, as such. If "men who have sex with men but aren't gay" are a thing, then surely you could do anal with a woman and still be gay.
-
@FrostCat Okay. I probably could, yes. But I have no desire to do so. I wouldn't turn it down if the possibility came up, I guess? I don't fantasize about it or anything, though.
-
Guys. WTF. is . I'm not about to fight with NodeBB to move a billion posts from one thread to another
-
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
I wouldn't turn it down if the possibility came up, I guess?
So we're agreed: in principle, anyone would do Emma Watson. Seems reasonable to me!
-
@Yamikuronue said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Guys. WTF.
Nobody's fighting about here! I've gone out of my way not to antagonize @fox, although it sounds like I've thoroughly bemused him.
-
@FrostCat said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Nobody's fighting about here!
Yet. This is still TDWTF.
-
@Yamikuronue said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Yet. This is still TDWTF.
As long as @Polygeekery stays out of the thread, we're probably fine.
Oh, uh, oops.
-
@FrostCat said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
I've thoroughly bemused him.
Yes, the question of whether or not I would turn down a female celebrity's offer to sleep with me is thoroughly bemusing. I honestly don't know what I would say - I'm guessing it would have to come down to the circumstances. I also honestly don't even know for sure if I could, though I'm guessing I could make it work if I did end up wanting to go through with it.
-
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
a female celebrity's offer to sleep with me
Remember, for this discussion I'm throwing you a bone and letting you do anal. If that helps.
-
@FrostCat said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
a female celebrity's offer to sleep with me
Remember, for this discussion I'm throwing you a bone and letting you do anal. If that helps.
I don't think you're in a position to "let him do" anything...
-
@Tsaukpaetra Well, he is in a position to "let me do anal." He's just (hopefully) not in a position to let me do anal with Emma Watson.
-
-
@FrostCat unless it's for $5, you guys are on the wrong topic
-
@FrostCat said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
"men who have sex with men but aren't gay" are a thing
Are there? Huh. As a straight male, I find the entire concept repulsive on an instinctual level. Whether the guy is Orlando Bloom or a crazy homeless guy living in the dumpster, it's pretty much the same kind of "ew, gross" feeling.
I'd imagine gay men feel similarly about women.
-
@groo said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
@FrostCat unless it's for $5, you guys are on the wrong topic
-
@bb36e said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
@groo said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
@FrostCat unless it's for $5, you guys are on the wrong topic
On account of recent topic flow...
-
@Tsaukpaetra you could even put on that footlong!
-
@Fox said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
He's just (hopefully) not in a position to let me do anal with Emma Watson.
No no, you totes have my permission to do anal with her. I can't promise what she would say about it.
-
@groo said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
unless it's for $5, you guys are on the wrong topic
Oh, now you're the "no-topic-drift" cop?
-
@Maciejasjmj said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
Are there? Huh.
Apparently, yes. I don't know if that means they're really gay but don't want to admit it. You'll sometimes hear about it, mostly in the context of stories about AIDS.
-
@bb36e said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
@Tsaukpaetra you could even put on that footlong!
Stop! You're making me hungry and I already had lunch!
-
@bb36e At which point it's somewhere around 9 dollars or some bullshit.
-
@Maciejasjmj said in a whole lotta nothing, only $5:
I'd imagine gay men feel similarly about women.
When I happen to see women in sexual situations whilst I am *ahem* looking for other things, my response is almost always a momentary "nope" as I move on - not repulsed, more disinterested than anything. Sometimes it does gross me out, but that's actually pretty rare. And every once in a while I've actually found it a little interesting. I've pretty much always thought of myself as a 5 on the Kinsey Scale, though - not exclusively gay, but only incidentally straight. I guess exclusively gay guys would always be grossed out. Me? I'm not actively interested, but I'm open to the idea that it might be something I'd enjoy under the right circumstances.