WTF Bites
-
@zecc At least in this case I know it's a proper 32 GB SD card. Even if macOS thinks it got a couple extra GB for some reason.
-
@pie_flavor said in WTF Bites:
@zecc Chinese knockoffs do that. It reports as being huge so you don't think you got scammed, but it's tiny under the hood.
I read a magazine article about that a few years ago. They mentioned you usually encounter them as merchandise, and while you might be able to flash the controller with the right size, usually the memory cells aren't the only thing they skimped on and you're better off chucking it.
-
If I look at the prices of our neighbouring countries and compare it to here I feel I have every right to say it is a luxury here.
That's exactly my experience with German mobile, too.
To be fair,
tonightthatcould be saidis true about internet in general in Germany.
FTFY
(Also, that might explain why I had trouble with YouTube yesterday evening. And here I was, blaming my provider when they might not have been at fault for once XD)
-
And here I was, blaming my provider when they might not have been at fault for once
Blame them anyway, on the grounds of getting your revenge in first…
-
And here I was, blaming my provider when they might not have been at fault for once
Blame them anyway, on the grounds of getting your revenge in first…
Oh don't worry, I blame them for everything. Internet not working? Stupid provider! Dropped something? Damn you, <provider>! Stubbed a toe? Fucking <provider> damn shit aargh! Not that it makes any kind of difference, but it's nice to have somebody to be angry at XD
-
And here I was, blaming my provider when they might not have been at fault for once
Blame them anyway, on the grounds of getting your revenge in first…
Oh don't worry, I blame them for everything. Internet not working? Stupid provider! Dropped something? Damn you, <provider>! Stubbed a toe? Fucking <provider> damn shit aargh! Not that it makes any kind of difference, but it's nice to have somebody to be angry at XD
Hey! That's MY job! I'm the universal scapegoat!!
-
Nothing against this project, I think it might be interesting, but the description made me
-
@bb36e Sounds like it's inspired by
-
@bb36e WebAssembly… in Ring 0… That's not actually the craziest thing I've ever heard of in operating systems, but it's pretty close.
-
And here I was, blaming my provider when they might not have been at fault for once
Blame them anyway, on the grounds of getting your revenge in first…
Oh don't worry, I blame them for everything. Internet not working? Stupid provider! Dropped something? Damn you, <provider>! Stubbed a toe? Fucking <provider> damn shit aargh! Not that it makes any kind of difference, but it's nice to have somebody to be angry at XD
Hey! That's MY job! I'm the universal scapegoat!!
So you're the one responsible for the power outage in my neighbourhood yesterday! I was just going to blame Deutsche Telecom.
-
And here I was, blaming my provider when they might not have been at fault for once
Blame them anyway, on the grounds of getting your revenge in first…
Oh don't worry, I blame them for everything. Internet not working? Stupid provider! Dropped something? Damn you, <provider>! Stubbed a toe? Fucking <provider> damn shit aargh! Not that it makes any kind of difference, but it's nice to have somebody to be angry at XD
Hey! That's MY job! I'm the universal scapegoat!!
So you're the one responsible for the power outage in my neighbourhood yesterday! I was just going to blame Deutsche Telecom.
Of course it's my fault! I didn't go review their infrastructure to find the fault that caused the outage before it happened, for one.
-
… to be honest I am not sure the isolation at VM level would actually be faster than the isolation at CPU level. The Wasm gives you a blob of memory and lets you play in it as you wish, so either you define the segments and page tables and leave it up to the CPU as before, or you do the mapping in the VM, but the specialised tools are probably better optimised.
-
@boomzilla said in WTF Bites:
But for any other app it seems highly unlikely that everyone else would be on there.
Depends on your social circles too. My teenage daughter used to use a lot of voice and SMS, so when we switched carriers we made sure we put her on a plan with unlimited voice and SMS. But apparently these days all her circle are using Snapchat, so she regularly winds up pushing or exceeding her data limit, even though it's almost twice what the rest of us manage with.
Though, having a look at my carrier's current plans, it looks like converting to the new plans could save us $11/month and give most of us unlimited voice and SMS ($200 value currently), and giving my daughter an extra 1.5 GB of data. Might have to have a chat with them about that.
Aaaaanyway. I actually came here to post this:
Amazon's definition of "similar" needs a bit of work. Or fewer cookbooks.
-
-
And here I was, blaming my provider when they might not have been at fault for once
Blame them anyway, on the grounds of getting your revenge in first…
Oh don't worry, I blame them for everything. Internet not working? Stupid provider! Dropped something? Damn you, <provider>! Stubbed a toe? Fucking <provider> damn shit aargh! Not that it makes any kind of difference, but it's nice to have somebody to be angry at XD
Which is hilarious if your provider is Cox...
-
@boomzilla Which cookbook is that from?
-
-
@boomzilla I should have seen that coming :)
-
-
@pie_flavor said in WTF Bites:
So it's doing the checksum-ing as part of the download, thinks it has all the files but hasn't actually checked them all yet?
-
@tsaukpaetra No, it's downloading.
For the last gigabyte, it had correct numbers but said KB/s instead of MB/s.
-
@pie_flavor said in WTF Bites:
@tsaukpaetra No, it's downloading.
For the last gigabyte, it had correct numbers but said KB/s instead of MB/s.Ah. See, if you post a
picturevideo without context, Ben, people have to guess what you mean.
-
@tsaukpaetra Seems pretty obvious to me.
-
@pie_flavor said in WTF Bites:
@tsaukpaetra Seems pretty obvious to me.
So obvious that the first response was "what's the WTF here? I'm going to guess X? Maybe?"
-
@tsaukpaetra when it says it's downloading, and the amount it has left to download is going down at a downloady speed...
-
@pie_flavor said in WTF Bites:
@tsaukpaetra when it says it's downloading, and the amount it has left to download is going down at a downloady speed...
I make no such assumptions on the meaning of an interface's choice of words. They often don't mean what they say.
Take, for instance, the Popcorn button.
-
-
@bb36e WebAssembly… in Ring 0… That's not actually the craziest thing I've ever heard of in operating systems, but it's pretty close.
I'm intrigued what it is, then.
I've heard of TempleOS and that's not even close.
-
@bb36e WebAssembly… in Ring 0… That's not actually the craziest thing I've ever heard of in operating systems, but it's pretty close.
I'm intrigued what it is, then.
I've heard of TempleOS and that's not even close.An OS implemented entirely — including drivers and memory management — in pure Tcl 8.0 without any assembly or C thunks. The guy who told m about this had implemented hardware that ran all that stuff natively. The very idea of doing that still makes my brain cower in fright, and I encountered it in 2002…
TempleOS is much saner and is more of a harking back to how many micros did their OSs in the '80s.
-
Excuse the lack of pixels, I stole it from the internets.
Bing/MS translates 'auto' to the Danish word for 'car' (bil). Auto would have been just fine...
-
Status: Isn't it great that closing tabs is a non-deterministic action in Edge?
-
@laoc When I went a few years ago I got a sim card with IIRC 3 GB of data included for pretty cheap, at least compared to anything you can get in Canadia.
Whow. I've never been to Canada but I suppose you guys have some astronomical infrastructure costs compared to ze Germani.
Nope. Just corruption. Lots of corruption.
Sorry, I mean we had this HUGE coincidence where we ended up with only two major telcoms, and their former CEOs just happen to end up getting high-paying jobs as the head of the government regulatory / oversight commission.
-
@blakeyrat said in WTF Bites:
@coldandtired That guy has a single joke, but dammit, he commits.
You gotta diversify even just a bit. Have a single joke PER USER, but make them all different jokes.
Like how how I slipped my punchline into your mom last night.
...
wait, no that was @pie_flavor. Sorry, my mistake, but to be fair, both of you guys' moms look the same from behind.
-
I've inherited a project that wasn't a lot of fun to work with.
The time machine project, and now you're stuck working with yourself?
-
Apparently, this SD card got more free space than its maximum capacity.
(33.23 GB free out of 31.48 GB)
Only if you flip it over and use side b.
-
@pie_flavor said in WTF Bites:
Chinese knockoffs do that. It reports as being huge so you don't think you got scammed, but it's tiny under the hood.
That's racist.
-
@tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
Status: Isn't it great that closing tabs is a non-deterministic action in Edge?
Huh?
-
@lorne-kates said in WTF Bites:
@tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
Status: Isn't it great that closing tabs is a non-deterministic action in Edge?
Huh?
I clicked the tab's X button, which made the tab go away, but it did not close the tab's content pane nor did it bring me to the Edge New Tab screen.
Edit: Of course, clicking the + (new tab) button promptly brought up the new tab screen and I could no longer get back to the error page that I had tried to close earlier. I wonder if it's still there...
-
@tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
I clicked the tab's X button, which made the tab go away, but it did not close the tab's content pane nor did it bring me to the Edge New Tab screen.
Oh, so that's why the screenshot looks like a flat, jumbled, unintelligible piece of mindfuck. I just a assumed that's how Edge normally looks.
-
@lorne-kates said in WTF Bites:
@tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
I clicked the tab's X button, which made the tab go away, but it did not close the tab's content pane nor did it bring me to the Edge New Tab screen.
Oh, so that's why the screenshot looks like a flat, jumbled, unintelligible piece of mindfuck. I just a assumed that's how Edge normally looks.
Yes, it normally looks like that. But usually with at least one tab. ;)
-
@tsaukpaetra I see you successfully inserted Tab A into Slot B.
-
@pie_flavor said in WTF Bites:
@tsaukpaetra I see you successfully inserted Tab A into Slot B.
I had my doubts.
-
And here I was, blaming my provider when they might not have been at fault for once
Blame them anyway, on the grounds of getting your revenge in first…
Oh don't worry, I blame them for everything. Internet not working? Stupid provider! Dropped something? Damn you, <provider>! Stubbed a toe? Fucking <provider> damn shit aargh! Not that it makes any kind of difference, but it's nice to have somebody to be angry at XD
Hey! That's MY job! I'm the universal scapegoat!!
How about I blame both my provider and you in turn?
-
@tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
And here I was, blaming my provider when they might not have been at fault for once
Blame them anyway, on the grounds of getting your revenge in first…
Oh don't worry, I blame them for everything. Internet not working? Stupid provider! Dropped something? Damn you, <provider>! Stubbed a toe? Fucking <provider> damn shit aargh! Not that it makes any kind of difference, but it's nice to have somebody to be angry at XD
Which is hilarious if your provider is Cox...
Vodafone, unfortunately. Cox would work so much better but it's not even an option here ^^
-
@tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
I clicked the tab's X button, which made the tab go away, but it did not close the tab's content pane nor did it bring me to the Edge New Tab screen.
Ah. See, if you post a
picture without context, Ben, people have to guess what you mean.picturevideo
-
@tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
I clicked the tab's X button, which made the tab go away, but it did not close the tab's content pane nor did it bring me to the Edge New Tab screen.
Ah. See, if you post a
picture without context, Ben, people have to guess what you mean.picturevideo@tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
Isn't it great that closing tabs is a non-deterministic action in Edge?
What context are you looking for?
-
Like @Lorne-Kates, I'm not too familiarized with Edge's interface, though it retrospect I can see where a tab header would be expected to appear.
But mostly I was just taking a low-effort jab at you.
-
Like @Lorne-Kates, I'm not too familiarized with Edge's interface, though it retrospect I can see where a tab header would be expected to appear.
But mostly I was just taking a low-effort jab at you.
-
GODDAMNIT
JSbrowsersDOMW3Cfbmac!This is the code bound to that blue button in there:
target.findElement('.callcenter-rename-message').off('click.callcenter').on('click.callcenter', (e) => { e.preventDefault(); let messageID = $(e.target).data('messageid'); let messageName = $(e.target).siblings('input').eq(0).val(); // Logs to figure out WTF is happening console.log(e.target); console.log(e.currentTarget); /* Do stuff with data here */ });
This worked reliably in FF, but not in Webkit browsers. So, the hell?
This is what gets logged in FF, every time:
<button class="btn btn-sm btn-primary callcenter-rename-message" data-messageid="9"> <button class="btn btn-sm btn-primary callcenter-rename-message" data-messageid="9">
This is what gets logged in Webkit browsers if you click on the checkbox instead of the button background:
<span class="fa fa-check">…</span> <button class="btn btn-sm btn-primary callcenter-rename-message" data-messageid="9">…</button>
- is this shit inconsistent?
- is
currentTarget
the parent element andtarget
is thespan
with the content? Could they have picked more confusing names? - is the criteria that determines what
currentTarget
will point at anyway? I don't know, I don't care, use it and hope it doesn't break, it's not like it's consistent anyway
This is not the first time this bit me on the ass, but it gets no less annoying with time.
Filed under: All love to fbmac, I had no idea what to put at the end so I just meme'd it
-
is the criteria that determines what currentTarget will point at anyway?
currentTarget
is by definition the element to which you attached the event listener. That's actually the one that's more reliable.target
is whatever generated the event, in this case the element you clicked, but could be any ancestor up to and including the one with the event listener. In this case, it appears Firefox doesn't expect anyone to put elements inside a<button>
(though it renders just fine) and doesn't generate click events deeper than that.You can make it consistent by adding this CSS:
button * { pointer-events: none; }
Now
target
will always be your button.