The Official Woody Woodpecker Thread
-
lied
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
And to paraphrase my response, fuck you for thinking I'm anywhere close to as much of a complete scumbag as you are.
I think you're projecting again.
-
How many times must i point out that just because it's a "joke" doesn't make it okay to condone assault, violence, and/or murder?!
How many times must we point out that you don't get to decide for us what is funny?
-
-
Show me data demonstrating that hairy-backed people suffer abuse and assaults at rates comparable to those experienced by trans people, and I'll concede that you might have a point.
If you find me data that trans people experience assaults at a significant higher rate tha other marginalized groups and its some how my fault then I might be interested in your argument.
-
I think you missed the part where the OP was the one who dragged it into the lounge.
Yeah, that didn't happen.
-
How many times must we point out that you don't get to decide for us what is funny?
How many times must I point out that something which is DEADLY for others isn't justified just because it's FUNNY to you? Also, your psychopathic tendencies are showing again.
-
Are you sure? I'm not sure if you know what a mirror is.
How many times must I point out that something which is DEADLY for others isn't justified just because it's FUNNY to you? Also, your psychopathic tendencies are showing again.
I complained that I might be getting Aneurysms earlier. How dare people laugh at that. I could die!
-
How many times must I point out that something which is DEADLY for others isn't justified just because it's FUNNY to you?
Knock knock.
Who’s there?
Walnut.
Walnut who?
Walnut too strong, don’t lean on it.I hope my wife doesn't read this. She's horribly allergic to walnuts.
-
How many times must I point out that something which is DEADLY for others isn't justified just because it's FUNNY to you?
Tosh.0 must really piss you off.
-
How many times must i point out that just because it's a "joke" doesn't make it okay to condone assault, violence, and/or murder?!
Is making a joke about it actually condoning it?
Filed under: No
-
You don't get to impose your sense of morality upon others. Deal with it.
-
-
In that context, yes. None of you were ridiculing that behavior, you were ridiculing trans people.
-
Aw, shit, another genius who just casually disproved all of the criminal justice system with a single sentence. I guess we should really open the prisons now, since the criminals just have different morality systems than we do.
-
You don't get to be a prick without being mocked for it. Deal with it.
-
Your wife isn't allergic to the word "walnut", is she?
-
How many times must i point out that just because it's a "joke" doesn't make it okay to condone assault, violence, and/or murder?!
Please explain how a joke about Discourse condones assault, violence and murder. I'd love to hear that.
Also, please explain to me how libelous accusing people of being violent murderers is okay.
-
But what if someone reads that joke and then knocks on the door with walnuts?
-
None of you were ridiculing that behavior, you were ridiculing trans people.
Mostly we were ridiculing you.
-
Your wife isn't allergic to the word "walnut", is she?
Sometimes just hearing it or thinking about them makes her feel itchy.
-
Mostly we were ridiculing you.
In a thread I'd never posted in and in which I was not mentioned, @ or otherwise? Amazing. Your subtlety astounds me.
-
Aw, shit, another genius who just casually disproved all of the criminal justice system with a single sentence.
Yeah, that never happened. You are not the criminal justice system, and laughing about something is not criminal behavior.
Idiot.
-
When you're comparing discourse to trans people. That's how.
-
walnuts
That's nutphobic. You should include berries who identify as nuts, plus vegetables who are otherkin-adjacent to nuts.
-
BUT THE CRIMINALS JUST HAVE A DIFFERENT DEFINITION OF MORALITY. WE DON'T GET TO TELL THEM THEIR DEFINITION OF MORALITY IS WRONG, BECAUSE THEY'RE ALL SPECIAL SNOWFLAKES.
To quote boomzilla, your superpower is shooting yourself in the foot.
Hypocrite.
-
-
When you're comparing discourse to trans people. That's how.
You've never heard of an analogy, have you? Here, let me give you an analogy: suppose you want to talk about analogies, but the person you're talking to doesn't understand what an analogy is. So instead you talk about how you can talk about cars instead of other subjects because people understand cars, and that is an analogy for an analogy.
So, remind me again how libelously accusing people of being murderers is "okay" again?
-
In a thread I'd never posted in and in which I was not mentioned
Which topic? I meant generally.
-
When you're comparing discourse to trans people. That's how.
Everyone has become largely indifferent to them but a vocal minority like to keep them in the headlines?@Lorne_Kates said:
That's nutphobic.
I'm not nutphobic. I just ordered two pounds of peanut butter.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
otherkin
Could you guys stop mentioning those every otherkin discussion?
OKTFY
-
Oh, okay. So back when I had less than a dozen posts across the entire forum, concentrated in two threads most of you don't really bother with, you were still setting up elaborate and subtle jokes about trans people that were just metaphors for me. Seems legit.
-
setting up elaborate and subtle jokes
That doesn't sound like this place at all. Throw-away one liners is more our speed.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
You've never heard of an analogy, have you?
You realize that an analogy is a comparison, right?
-
That doesn't sound like this place at all. Throw-away one liners is more our speed
Well that's not what was going on in TTTCBN before I found it.
-
You realize that an analogy is a comparison, right?
You know a comparison is comparable to a tautological comparison, right?
Also, how is libelously accusing people of being murderers OK?
-
@boomzilla said:
That doesn't sound like this place at all. Throw-away one liners is more our speed
Well that's not what was going on in TTTCBN before I found it.
Oh, I thought you were talking about the stuff going on in other places. Yeah, long form flamewars are different. Like mobile. But not really.
-
There is no systematic discrimination of trans. It is not legal to harm a trans person simply because they are trans.
It may not be "legal" but it's certainly a fact that can get a murderer a lighter sentence in the US. All states but California recognize the "Gay Panic Defense". Also:A transgender variation of the gay panic defense was also used in 2004–2005 in California by the three defendants in the Gwen Araujo homicide case, who claimed that they were enraged by the discovery that Araujo, a transgender teenager with whom they had engaged in sex, had male genitalia. Following their initial suspicions about her biological sex, Araujo was "subjected to forced genital exposure in the bathroom, after which it was announced that 'he was really a man'".[26] The defendants claimed that Araujo's failure to disclose her biological sex was tantamount to deception, and that the subsequent revelation of her biological sex "had provoked the violent response to what Thorman represented as a sexual violation 'so deep it's almost primal'".[26] The first trial resulted in a jury deadlock; in the second, defendants Mike Magidson and Jose Merél were convicted of second-degree murder, while the jury again deadlocked in the case of Jason Cazares. Cazares later entered a plea of no contest to charges of voluntary manslaughter. Despite the evidence of premeditation presented by the prosecution, the jury failed to secure first degree murder or hate crime convictions for the defendants.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
how is libelously accusing people of being murderers OK?
When you're condoning murder, which then makes it not libelous.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
how is libelously accusing people of being murderers OK?
When you're condoning murder, which then makes it not libelous.
That statement in itself is libelously accusing people of being murderers.
So how is libelously accusing people of being murderers OK?
-
@Fox I have found picture that perfectly describes how you view reality.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
how is libelously accusing people of being murderers OK?
When you're condoning murder, which then makes it not libelous.
The Occutards condoned bank robbery. So we should be calling them bank robbers?
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
That statement in itself is libelously accusing people of being murderers.
-
By @Lorne_Kates' version of "calling", you just did.
-
BUT THE CRIMINALS JUST HAVE A DIFFERENT DEFINITION OF MORALITY. WE DON'T GET TO TELL THEM THEIR DEFINITION OF MORALITY IS WRONG, BECAUSE THEY'RE ALL SPECIAL SNOWFLAKES.
To quote boomzilla, your superpower is shooting yourself in the foot.
Hypocrite.
I said you don't get to decide, you fucking idiot. You expect an entire group to concede to your ideals and standards. You are one self-centered fuckhead.
-
-
By @Lorne_Kates' version of "calling", you just did.
I was following your professed standards. Honestly, they're much worse than bank robbers, who are just in it for the money for themselves.
-
No one is driven to suicide, they choose suicide.
This might be an interesting illustration to your point, I think. In short, it's an anti-suicide post written by a psychiatrist that has been met with a quite hostile reaction from suicide-pondering-and-depressed people, ended with someone threating to commit suicide because of it and was subsequently deleted. (Hence the Wayback Machine link.)
I like how we have no less than four transphobia flamewars going on simultaneously.
Were they all mainly fueled by the opposition to Fox views?
I don't know what that is, but it is. I suspect it has to do with our society sheltering children from dealing with failure, but I do not know this for certain.
Again, this guy would say that that's narcissism. He's written a whole blog on that subject. It's quite insightful.
hardcore black metal
Those guys are usually quite good at establishing groups that shield them from that.@Maciejasjmj said:
namely, that we find transsexuals a turnoff.
False. It started because people were saying that it would be okay to flip out upon finding that the girl you took home was transsexual, in any stage of transition.It's funny how you say "false" and then proceed to contradict your point.
-
you
Ah, i see, you were erronneously using the singular form of "you", whereas I assumed that you were correctly using the plural, because I'm definitely not the only one who views "condoning assault, violence, and/or murder" as immoral.
-
contradict
You say that like I was merely reiterating what I called false. I was not. Once again, there is a difference between
I'm not comfortable with this
And
Fuck you, you fucking faggot, get the fuck out of my house before I beat you, you perverted little shit
-