Fsck you. Give me money. (Now with IndieGoGo)
-
There are 7 billion people on the planet. 2,000/7,000,000,000 is fuck-all.
There is 1 Mona Lisa. Therefore, the Mona Lisa does not exist.
-
There is 1 Mona Lisa. Therefore, the Mona Lisa does not exist.
Did you forget your meds today? Millions of people go see the Mona Lisa every year. 2,000 people want to hear songs in Logjam.
-
My statement was ∃. You denied that.
-
-
The definitions of these sets seem to include a predicate function as to set membership - so if what I am asked to distinguish includes those predicate definitions, then yes. Else no. And I certainly can't well-order them. Well, not meaningfully at least...
-
There are 7 billion people on the planet. 2,000/7,000,000,000 is fuck-all.
@ben_lubar said:There is 1 Mona Lisa. Therefore, the Mona Lisa does not exist.
I think, "There are fuck-all Mona Lisas (Monas Lisa?) present" is the more accurate application, and is true nearly everywhere.
-
-
No, but I didn't expect that to stop either of you.
I detect a whiff of someone who's jealous he missed out on an opening.
-
I and a considerable number of my imaginary friends would seriously consider hearing about Lojban.
-
On the other hand, I'm happy to hear about Mac Classic. Not sure about my imaginary friends though.
-
Well, Mac Classic is doing far better than sludgebun when it comes to the hearing-about stakes.
-
On the contrary we[1] have near consensus that Lojban is preferable to hear about. Mac classic has been traumatizing to a few of us.
[1] This is an exclusive "we". In this context it must be understood to refer to me and my friends which doesn't include you because you're not in my head (you're one of my numerous external projections). In Lojban I would use "mi'a" instead of "ma'a" and the distinction would be clear. You see how Lojban wins again?
-
You see how Lojban wins again?
I think so.
http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002690653/4245603595_Charlie_Sheen_Winning_xlarge.jpeg
-
On the contrary we[1] have near consensus that Lojban is preferable to hear about. Mac classic has been traumatizing to a few of us.
[1] This is an exclusive "we". In this context it must be understood to refer to me and my friends which doesn't include you because you're not in my head (you're one of my numerous external projections). In Lojban I would use "mi'a" instead of "ma'a" and the distinction would be clear. You see how Lojban wins again?
Allow me to try to add some criteria:
- How to say "Fuck you. Give me money" in Lojban
- Can someone post a screenshot of a Mac Classic accessing my GoFundMe page?
-
We are unable to serve either request
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
How to say "Fuck you. Give me money" in Lojban
-
1,841,186 wanted to watch earwax being removed. So, 900x more people would prefer to watch earwax being removed than want to hear Logjam.
Maybe those people want to have the earwax removed so that they can hear logjam more clearly.
Actually, it would make more sense if it were a "How to insert earwax" video.
-
"How to insert earwax"
The Bad Ideas Thread is: Aww fuck where'd I put it, I think I just accidentally the entire thread oh wait there it is
-
a'unai
-
-
Fuck them.
-
Really, did nobody bat an eye at giving money to something called cards against humanity?
Apparently the final tally was around $71k, and they spent it on expensive scotch, big-ass TVs, and a 24-carat gold vibrating
dildopersonal massager.Fuck you indeed. The money of idiots, well spent.
-
I wonder if the presence of the red "SALE" tag on that dialog is enough to get them into trouble legally, since they weren't in fact selling anything. One would hope the (I assume compulsory) disclaimer checkbox would cover that, but it only takes one idiot to sue.
-
One would hope the (I assume compulsory) disclaimer checkbox would cover that, but it only takes one idiot to sue.
Well, they did also explicitly (and “notoriously”) say that you'd get nothing in return. It's not like they were being deceptive at all. The court's first recourse is going to be to telling the idiot that they're an idiot and going straight to dismissing the suit.
-
The court's first recourse is going to be to telling the idiot that they're an idiot and going straight to dismissing the suit.
Says the man who has never been exposed to the idiocy that is the US Civil Courts.
-
So looking at the thread title, if I have a file system and pay you money, you'll check me out?
-
IndieGoGo's website sucks fucking balls. I've had to redo the campaign three times, because it keeps losing the info. And the image uploader doesn't work in Firefox. Fall back to non-JS shit WHY DO THAT.
Trying in Chrome.
-
Oh and look at this shit. Should we use a standard drop down? NO LET'S MAKE IT FANCY. So you can't type in the text box. And the "search" box doesn't autofocus. And you can't tab or press enter to select the value you finally decide on.
-
Fuck you. Give me money.
-
Non-short link:
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/fuck-you-give-me-money--2/x/4238573
Because apparently igg.me is offline or some dumb shit.
-
I think your campaign might be better received on www.generosity.com. :P
-
I think your campaign might be better received on www.generosity.com. :P
That's just some scummy subsidiary of Indiegogo. When IGG closes down this one, I'll move it to generosity.com
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
When IGG closes down this one
How long do you think that will take?
Has anyone ever pledged any money on your "Fuck you give me money" fundraisers?
-
How long do you think that will take?
They have 60 days until the project ends.
Has anyone ever pledged any money on your "Fuck you give me money" fundraisers?
I don't care. If they did give me money, fuck them.
-
Re: upthread. Cards Against Humanity blatantly and libelous STOLE my idea of "fuck you give me money". However, I official rescind my complaint, and grant a retroactive license, because of this:
(from one of the co-creators, who presumably got a cut of the $5 thing)
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
When IGG closes down this one
Let's look at their terms for "prohibited campaigns"
Campaign Owners are not permitted to create a Campaign to raise funds for illegal activities,
There's nothing illegal about fuck you or giving Lorne money.
to cause harm to people
Nobody ever got hurt by giving Lorne money. Or fuck you.
or property,
The 13th amendment took care of that one.
or to scam others.
It sounds pretty straightforward to me. You give Lorne money, and in return, he does nothing. In fact, I can't think of a way to turn that into a scam that would be more profitable or easier to manage than the legitimate business.
If the Campaign is claiming to do the impossible or it's just plain phony, don't post it.
I know that fuck you is possible because of certain websites on the internet. Also, there are no :phone: anywhere on this page, so what are you talking about?
Users must comply with all applicable laws and regulations in connection with their Campaigns, including offering Perks and using Contributions.
I'm not aware of any legal restrictions on fuck you or giving Lorne money, but Lorne will need to pay taxes on any income, assuming Canada has taxes on money earned by fuck you.
Campaign Owners shall not make any false or misleading statements in connection with their Campaigns.
If any of the statements are false, that means Lorne has to do work, but I guess we both know that isn't going to happen.
-
There's nothing illegal about fuck you or giving Lorne money.
Unless he's exchanging one for the other.
-
@ben_lubar said:
There's nothing illegal about fuck you or giving Lorne money.
Unless he's exchanging one for the other.
Unless he's filming it.
-
Sweet, it's pay-day tomorrow, this is just in time!
-
How about the guidelines?
Indiegogo is not a place for hatred, abuse, discrimination, disrespect, profanity, meanness, harassment, or spam.
profanity? Fuck
Do not:
use the Services to promote violence, degradation, subjugation, discrimination or hatred against individuals or groups based on race, ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity;
Think this is OK. Sexual orientation might seem dodgy but fuck you is open to all.
post images or videos that are sexually explicit or post links to sites that contain sexually explicit material or show people or animals being hurt or degraded;
Fuck you isn't sexually explicit
spam the comments sections or other Users with offers of goods and services or inappropriate messages;
Yeah, don't do that
engage in any activity that interferes with or disrupts the proper working of the Services or any activities conducted on the Services; or
Can fuck you cause a DDOS? No, I think you're OK
take any action that imposes, in Indiegogo’s sole discretion, an unreasonable load on Indiegogo's infrastructure.
See above
represent products created by others as your own creation, or act as a reseller of other’s products.
Not reselling, or selling, anything
So apart from a mention in the introduction, there's no explicit "don't fucking swear" clause
-
represent products created by others as your own creation
Actually, there's the problem. He's offering to do nothing, but Congress already holds the patent on that process.
-
How about the guidelines?
Yeah, Lorne is very much an equal-opportunity hater. However, he might have a problem with the generalDo not:
use the Services to promote violence, degradation, subjugation, discrimination or hatred against individuals or groups based on race, ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity;Think this is OK. Sexual orientation might seem dodgy but fuck you is open to all.
Indiegogo is not a place for hatred, ...
-
Yeah, Lorne is very much an equal-opportunity hater. However, he might have a problem with the general
Indiegogo is not a place for hatred, ...
True. They might not be discriminating enough to tell the difference between hatred and aggressive apathy.
-
And on the subject of "IndieGoGo's website is utter shit".
The project was up for less than 24 hours, and already I started getting spam.
Not in the comments, oh no. Instead, IndieGoGo lets people send your emails through the website. And I already got "Hi my name is Steve and I love your idea. Here's a link on how I increased my pledges by 25%" followed by an obfuscated bitly link.
IndieGoGo, for letting complete randos sent arbitrary HTML directly to someone's (hidden) email address. I bet they didn't even have to solve a captcha or anything.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
I bet they didn't even have to solve a captcha or anything.
They probably looked at your proposal and turned the CAPTCHA off.
-
Did you phrase it as "Fu
<!-- spam -->
ck you give me money" to get past the spam filter?because everyone does it as badly as Discourse, right?
-
Wow, IdieGoGo literally has no idea.
So they put up this page:
https://support.indiegogo.com/hc/en-us/articles/201751867-How-to-Evaluate-External-Consulting-Services"You may get offers from people to help your campaign. Here's a dozen paragraphs talking about how to evaluate if those offers, what sort of services are out there, etc. That is, here is two dozen paragraphs treating these as actual consultation RFP."
And at the END of that page, "Oh, BTW, we don't actually allow people to send these messages. It's against the TOS. lol. Email us."
So let me get this straight-- you KNOW what sort of comments and contacts aren't allowed. And everything you describe in the first dozen paragraphs is EXPLICITLY NOT ALLOWED. Why did you not lead with that. "If you get an offer like this, it's 100% bullshit. Ignore it. We'll also put a button and/or easy to fill out form to report spam."
Nope, they don't have that. Instead you have to EMAIL SUPPORT. Except it gets better.
I just got ANOTHER direct contact message. It is FROM "Indiegogo Support". As in:
Indiegogo Support (support@indiegogo.com)
As in from their domain, from their support address. So it'll automatically pass most blacklists and whitelists.
And the subject is:
New Message from Austin Roberts on Indiegogo
So I just got an email from a valid address in a whitelisted domain which, for all tents and purposes, looks like it is coming from a named employee of Indigogo's support team.
And then the body is:
Austin Roberts just sent a message to halcyon1234: Increase your chances to complete your project funding. We have an established network of hundreds of thousands of businesses, investors and donors and we focus on exposing projects to them. Visit our website to check our services! (spam link ommitted)
So now it looks like a legit offer FROM indiegogo support. AND IT GETS BETTER.
Notice how it has Spammy McFuckerton's name there? Guess what it doesn't have: His email address, or Indigogo username, or ANY OTHER IDENTIFYING INFORMATION. How am I supposed to report that?
#AND IT GETS BETTER!
Let's just say I accidentally reply (only to confirm it's spam and cut off contact)
Can I log into a message center to reply? No.
Can I reply to an obfuscated email address that will handle relaying the communication (like contact+98uSJsdsd6@indiegogo.com)? No.
Instead I'm supposed to reply DIRECTLY TO THE EMAIL... okay... and:
Reply directly to this email to respond to Austin Roberts’s message. Please note that your email address will be shared once you reply. Use discretion when interacting with individuals who offer third party services: they are not affiliated or associated with Indiegogo.
#WHAT THE LIVING PULP-FILLED SHIT INDIEGOGO??!?!?!?!?
If I accidentally reply-- or even try to forward this email to support-- they will instead expose my private email address to a spammer? Especially since they have right there "BTW: This is 100% for sure a spammer, don't reply to them".
Was this site designed from a "Websites for Dummies" book from 1997?
-
Can fuck you cause a DDOS? No, I think you're OK
Pretty sure if you say "fuck you" to the wrong kind of people, they can real life DDOS you...
-
-
@Kuro said:
real life DDOS
Is that when ten thousand people simultaneously ask you a question?
Is that when ten thousand people simultaneously ask you a question?
Filed under: Does it have to be the same question?