You have got to be shitting me... links stop being links?
-
-
-
Fuck, did I miss a day or... check again?
-
I'm not pulling another backup to check that, not this time of day
As previously mentioned, if you haven't been on the site between 0000UTC and when I took that backup, it'll be missing today's record and you'll be OK.
-
It's actually not that common. There are a few places, like
User.real
which filters out <0 (who the fuck thought up that name), but it's not treated specially very often.scope :real, -> { where('id > 0') }
More common is
Discourse.system_user
as the user argument to a function.
-
Obligatory Codinghorror post.
oh, God that post pissed me off when I first read it. Has the guy ever actually met a depressed person?
-
If you want to learn more about Depression, we have a thread about that hidden in this one: http://what.thedailywtf.com/t/thread-about-depression-and-things/2624/23
It even contains a nice @blakeyrat vs @morbiuswilters fight!
-
I avoided that thread because Gamergate seemed like a massively overblown incident that people were just using as an excuse to rant about their pet issue. Kind of like a lot of the threads on here.
Didn't realise there was a depression discussion in there too, but I wouldn't say I need to learn more about it. It's cost me jobs and postgraduate studies before and I'm currently looking after a fiancée who's started having suicidal intrusive thoughts.
Thanks for the heads up though
-
Only the first twentyish posts were about the games industry, actually. And iirc, discussions about that ended before the hashtag even appeared.
-
If you want to learn more about Depression
Like @jaloopa, I've been ignoring the thread, though in my case it's because any discussion of #gamergate leads to my finding out half the people I'm acquainted with are fucking awful people.
I clicked into the thread based on your link, though, because hey, if the topic changed, maybe it'll be more interesting.
Now I feel worse.
That entire thread belongs in the Bad Ideas Thread >.>
-
I wonder if GamersGate are losing business from this
-
I clicked into the thread based on your link, though, because hey, if the topic changed, maybe it'll be more interesting.
Now I feel worse.
That entire thread belongs in the Bad Ideas Thread >.>
I blame Morbs; he's the idiot who can't wrap his head around the idea that brain biology can screw up in ways that aren't fixable by 'oh, just try harder to think differently'.
Filed under: what happens if you put Morbs and a bipolar person in the same room?
-
Dragging the topic from a thread I have muted to a thread I'm actively posting in: also a candidate for the Bad Ideas Thread. Trust me, I understand why things went badly >.> With a safer group, that could be a really fascinating discussion, but it tends to up with "What is Reality? What is real? Does anything exist?" if the group is decent or everyone hating everyone else if not.
-
I'm assuming this isn't consecutive days as it shows 136 for me but I'm somewhere between 50 and 100.
-
You are, as I recall, one of the few beneficiaries of an off-by-one error in the old query that permitted a single days absence within the whole period concerned. (i.e. you had 99 days out of the last hundred.)
Rather than remove the badges you thought you'd earned, I stopped the revocation (for the moment, to give a chance to 'legitimately' earn it).
But yes, that result set is grand total.
-
Cheers - can you easily get the number of consecutive days I'm on, or is that one of those awkward queries?
-
Cant at the moment 'cos Mobile.
Remind me tomorrow before 1500 UTC if I've forgotten...
-
because any discussion of #gamergate leads to my finding out half the people I'm acquainted with are fucking awful people.
There, there. You'd find it out anyway.
-
I've been ignoring the thread, though in my case it's because any discussion of #gamergate leads to my finding out half the people I'm acquainted with are fucking awful people.
Oh don't worry, they're all fucking awful people. Just all in different unique ways. Everybody's a fucking awful person at heart.
-
-
Cheers - can you easily get the number of consecutive days I'm on, or is that one of those awkward queries?
username | start_range | end_range | days -----------+-------------+------------+------ loopback0 | 2014-05-22 | 2014-06-02 | 12 loopback0 | 2014-06-06 | 2014-06-09 | 4 loopback0 | 2014-06-12 | 2014-06-24 | 13 loopback0 | 2014-06-26 | 2014-06-30 | 5 loopback0 | 2014-07-03 | 2014-07-08 | 6 loopback0 | 2014-07-10 | 2014-08-05 | 27 loopback0 | 2014-08-07 | 2014-10-13 | 68 loopback0 | 2014-10-15 | 2014-10-15 | 1 (8 rows) Elapsed: 1.712s Backup taken: 2014-10-16 02:58:16.563138
-
Cheers - I was a lot closer on Monday than I am now! Haha.
-
All you have to do is go back to Tuesday and log in....
-
Now where did I leave that Delorean....
-
Have a word with @royal_poet, maybe she'll lend you her timelord
-
hehehe... generally the timelord is quite a bratty one and does not listen to what he is told. XD
-
could we bribe him with goodies to help us out?
-
could we bribe him with goodies to help us out?
Never mind what @royal_poet says, I do sometimes do as I'm told. But being a brat is a lot of fun too, which is why I don't always do as I'm told!
Sadly, the TARDIS is still under repair, blew up the dematerialisation circuit again last week after a short-circuit via the reversal of the neutron flow through the helmic regulator.
-
-
blew up the dematerialisation circuit again last week after a short-circuit via the reversal of the neutron flow through the helmic regulator.
That sounds like a Star Trek Voyager plotline.
-
So an update on the original topic from meta.d late yesterday (at least by my timezone):
However there was also this on 10/11, so I'm not sure why it took so long (or is cobbled together):
-
What were you thinking?!
Trying to repair the chameleon circuit. The universe clearly does not agree with this.
-
That sounds like a Star Trek Voyager plotline.
And Voyager didn't steal it from Doctor Who at all...
-
Trying to repair the chameleon circuit. The universe clearly does not agree with this.
Apparently.
-
// restore href
setTimeout(function(){
$link.removeClass('no-href');
$link.attr('href', $link.data('href'));
$link.data('href', null);
},50);I'm no Javascript expert, but is his solution to remake the link every 50 milliseconds? Because that seems like a very bad way to paper over the bug
-
It looks like it waits 50 milliseconds for other javascript to run, then puts the href back.
-
I'm no Javascript expert, but is his solution to remake the link every 50 milliseconds? Because that seems like a very bad way to paper over the bug
Looks like that's what is happening.
-
It looks like it waits 50 milliseconds for other javascript to run, then puts the href back.
indeed. that's setTimeout() not setInterval().
-
is appropriate all around.
- Instead of having it not get rid of the link when it's clicked, they stick it back on 50ms later.
- 2 people here missed that it's
setTimeout
, notsetInterval
. - I didn't number this item as #3.
- I'm still thinking about this "solution".
Now that I think about it a bit more (some of you, of course, ask why, and that's why it's now #4 in my list), if you're going to use setTimeout to tack it back on after the fact, why 50ms? I understand so it's quick enough that if they tab back, they shouldn't see it hidden, but why not 0 then?
-
- Fits the theme of discourse solutions
- Fits the theme of this site
- Uses more battery when on mobile
- Perfect 10 year solution
- I'm number 1!
-
2 people here missed that it's setTimeout, not setInterval.
DOH! Maybe I should be using Homer ...
-
-
I'm seeing a distinct lack of
- ???
- Profit
in all this...
-
There is no profit in my list, unless you get paid for every that happens.
-
Ah. I see what's happened now...
http://what.thedailywtf.com/t/poll-how-do-you-pronounce-the-prefix-gibi/4077/7?u=pjh
-
Good spot.
-
Lovely lovely overflow!
-
Technically, isn't that underflow?
-
Leftflow?
-
Isn't one just an off-by-one of the other?