The Official Funny Stuff Thread™
-
-
-
-
-
@PJH said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
Pfft amatuer! I knew a guy that had a gas-powered pogo stick. Now that was fun!
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
gas-powered pogo stick.
To save others some effort...
-
-
@loopback0 The CSS, or the wordpress, or the angular jqueryscript?
-
@PleegWat said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@loopback0 The CSS, or the wordpress, or the angular jqueryscript?
Yes.
-
-
-
-
-
-
@Tsaukpaetra Horse pills!
-
@dkf that could make you rather hoarse
-
-
So if I repeatedly do something that you obviously tried to prevent, but the contract technically allows?
Then you'd probably be referred to legal.
And they'd sue me?
Hmm? No, they'd hire you.
-
-
-
https://imgur.com/gallery/sNSTAB6
(It's a video. Let it load)
-
-
@Zecc said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
https://imgur.com/gallery/sNSTAB6
(It's a video. Let it load)
inb4 he gets arrested for walking on the grass.
-
-
https://i.imgur.com/R1dB5Sc.png
Dude apparently couldn't resolve conflict.
-
@Tsaukpaetra Multiple times I've considered starting a thread where I can quote posts to whinge about unnecessary JPEGginess
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
https://i.imgur.com/R1dB5Sc.png
Dude apparently couldn't resolve conflict.
Just say "if you have to ask, I'm not going to tell you".
That'll learn her.
-
Just tell her, "it's like "explaining", but from the point of view of a "gender bigot", also give her a cheeky "how dare you assume my pronouns!" for bonus points. It's also useful to throw out some examples, such as "mansplaining", "transplaining", and the quintessential "attackhelicoptersplaining".
-
@kazitor said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Tsaukpaetra Multiple times I've considered starting a thread where I can quote posts to whinge about unnecessary JPEGginess
You've found yourself the perfect forum for pedantic whining about minor technical gripes. Go ahead.
-
@topspin said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@kazitor said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Tsaukpaetra Multiple times I've considered starting a thread where I can quote posts to whinge about unnecessary JPEGginess
You've found yourself the perfect forum for pedantic whining about minor technical gripes. Go ahead.
But careful. Might start seeing JPEG artifacts in the real world, for several days. Like with that McCulkin effect or whatzitwas.
-
@Applied-Mediocrity said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@topspin said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@kazitor said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Tsaukpaetra Multiple times I've considered starting a thread where I can quote posts to whinge about unnecessary JPEGginess
You've found yourself the perfect forum for pedantic whining about minor technical gripes. Go ahead.
But careful. Might start seeing JPEG artifacts in the real world, for several days. Like with that McCulkin effect or whatzitwas.
Ask Jak Wilmot?
-
-
-
-
"How do we show five things in a cycle?"
"Just do four and add another one, obviously"
-
@hungrier
It looks like Monitor is about to invoke its safe word and leave the cycle.
-
-
-
@dcon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdHBsWXaHN8...and one Admiral's daughter.
-
@izzion said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
It looks like Monitor is about to invoke its safe word and leave the cycle.
Monitor just likes to watch…
-
Well, Clarice, have the lambs stopped screaming?
-
-
-
-
@Tsaukpaetra I assume that's meant to ridicule far-fetched conclusions. But if you're a lot more careful with your reasonings, that's exactly how science works. I mean we deduce the existence of planets, their orbits and even their atmospheres by incredibly small variations in the light we get from stars.
If we saw the right colors in Venus, we could absolutely deduce there's dinosaurs underneath.
-
@anonymous234 The problem is, the conclusion wasn't "Dinosaurs." It was "Maybe dinosaurs." Which is, as you say, entirely reasonable.
-
-
@anonymous234 said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Tsaukpaetra I assume that's meant to ridicule far-fetched conclusions. But if you're a lot more careful with your reasonings, that's exactly how science works. I mean we deduce the existence of planets, their orbits and even their atmospheres by incredibly small variations in the light we get from stars.
If we saw the right colors in Venus, we could absolutely deduce there's dinosaurs underneath.
But you should also be applying Feynman's advice about looking for ways it could be wrong. And then making sure experimental (or observational, in the case of the surface of Venus) evidence doesn't disagree.
-
-
@boomzilla also, "scarfolk council water boarding" at the bottom (maybe it's only funny because I don't know what water boarding is other than torture)