The Official Status Thread
-
And some languages don't even bother with pluralization at all:
printf("有在隊列中的%d個項目", num);
-
-
Even scarrier than this?
You know what is scarrier than that? If the camera had panned lower...that would be scarrier.
-
Even scarrier than this?
What is scary about scarification? It isn't really all that different from (several forms of traditional) tattooing.
-
Status: more than a little pissed off at the fact that the guy who messed with this switch last didn't factory reset it before putting it back on the "OH GOD THINGS ARE DOWN" spare shelf.
Oh, wait, that was me...
Nothing to see here...
-
Total fail at reverse image search:
-
-
Huh, worked fine for me:
Queen ElizabethThat's what I expected. It's not what I got.
-
What is scary about scarification?
Who said anything about it being scary? I was spellaring @accalia-ed "scarrier" vs. "scarier." Now we've killed the joke (such as it was).
-
I was spellaring @accalia-ed "scarrier" vs. "scarier." Now we've killed the joke (such as it was).
Oops. Sorry I'm so used to reading over things like that I don't notice them properly, my bad.
-
And you must admit, that's a pretty scarry back.
-
I can only assume Google thinks that the Commonwealth doesn't take its monarcy seriously.
-
I can only assume Google thinks that the Commonwealth doesn't take its monarcy seriously.
We British don't exactly take them seriously ourselves ;)
-
Status: Only 400 rooms to go... Only... 400...
Send help...
-
If the camera had panned lower
That would be a tilt, not a pan.
Rotation:
== pan
== tilt
== ?? There's probably a term for it, but I didn't find one in a few minutes of looking.
Translation:
== truck
== pedestal
Z-axis movement == dolly
-
== ?? There's probably a term for it, but I didn't find one in a few minutes of looking.
Roll ;)
-
I can only assume Google thinks that the Commonwealth doesn't take its monarchy seriously.
FTFYApparently, this is a meme on a popular /r/funny. I don't know why Google found /r/funny for me, but the real image for @locallunatic.
-
I think it's supposed to look like this:
x = 1 def f1(): nonlocal x x += 1 f1() print(x)
-
Apparently, this is a meme on a popular /r/funny. I don't know why Google found /r/funny for me, but the real image for @locallunatic.
-
> /r/funny
> meme
> implying /r/funny is ever original
lelNo implication regarding presence or absence of originality or actual humor was intended. "Meme" in the sense of "image with text added by memegenerator or similar site."
-
Status: some fuck meddled with the coffee machine at work again. It used to be that setting up 2 "big"* coffees would fill the cup perfectly, just enough to not spill it while carrying. Now the stupid thing overflows and you need to watch the coffee flowing to halt the machine in the right moment.
That's how it starts. First they screw with the settings, then they'll break it a few times, and in the end they're gonna start putting in decaf.
*btw, that's an exaggeration of the year - it's like 200ml.
-
in the end they're gonna start putting in decaf
Blood shall be spilled that day, comrade. I shall sent my finest men to help you defeat the swine who dares to do that!
Decaf! *spits*
-
Decaf! *spits*
Decaf coffee has absolutely no reason whatsoever to exist; it has had the only thing that gives it (barely) a reason to exist removed.
-
-
At least if you have to bring your own coffee like we do where I work you always get the right kind.
-
the only reason for adding nuts to chocolate is if there's some sort of disastrous chocolate shortage and it has to be bulked out
Not to dispute your choices when it comes to brownie making, but nuts go famously well with chocolate. Praline, one of the most godly things in the world of confectionary, is the combination of ground hazelnuts and chocolate (probably ganache)…
-
Nuts and chocolate may be nice if you like nuts, but if you add anything other than chocolate to chocolate you just end up with less chocolate.
-
if you add anything other than chocolate to chocolate you just end up with less chocolate
But... if you added stuff and took no chocolate away, how is that less chocolate?
Asking for a friend.
-
-
A lower concentration of chocolate would be more accurate, technically. But your stomach is still the same size and in the same amount of food there's less chocolate. Also it tastes less of chocolate because some of it is nut.
-
If your entire gastic system is not full from end to end with 100% pure chocolate, then you're somehow missing out on one of life's pleasures?
-
Nuts are all well and good but chocolate is better. Diluting chocolate with nuts is nonsensical unless you can't obtain enough chocolate to fill the whole thing, as it detracts from the chocolateyness.
-
I get this distinct feeling you like chocolate...
Just a hunch though.
-
Nuts are all well and good but chocolate is better.
I think you're missing the pleasures of switching things up. Variation makes you appreciate things even more. I'm usually unable to have a week when I don't have the same food twice (shortage of time for breakfast on the mornings I go to work is the main problem; I like sleeping too much ) but I can usually manage it for evening meals and the majority of lunches and snacks too.
What sort of purity of chocolate do you prefer?
-
-
Status: About to backup my
spamposts and I'm outta here.Hopefully the whole thing doesn't blow up. In case it does, I wish people who will be awake for it and watching it live a nice time and a fun show.
Later,
COMPLAIN
s.
-
Oh yeah, we got about 90 mins to go until 10PM EDT...
-
What sort of purity of chocolate do you prefer?
Well if we're talking just a bar of chocolate, I like 85% cocoa.
Variation is one thing. I like nuts - well some kinds of nuts - and I like chocolate. And many other things. I don't live off chocolate. But when I do have chocolate, I like to really experience chocolate. If you adulterate it with nuts or something you just don't really taste the chocolate or the nuts as much as you do if you have some chocolate and then some nuts.
It's like mixing paints. Some mixtures do make a nice bright colour - some flavours combine to make another flavour, like orange chocolate. Orange is just about the only thing that can be added to chocolate without detracting from it. But in general the more colours you just throw in together the more you just get something muddy and indistinct. Whereas if you'd painted with all the colours one at a time you'd have a lovely colourful picture.
-
About to backup my spamposts and I'm outta here.
Good luck. My backup fails every time. I wonder if it due to the screen name change?
-
Orange is just about the only thing that can be added to chocolate without detracting from it.
Capsaicin or sea salt are very complimentary to chocolate IMHO. Also, caramel and chocolate make a good pair.
-
Orange is just about the only thing that can be added to chocolate without detracting from it
Mint works really well too; just don't have orange and mint…
-
Mine worked so far.
So far.
Fuck it. I'm having ben retype the last 2 (3?) days of it if it fails.
-
I wonder if the disk space is full of backed up post histories. From forum members preparing for Armageddon?
-
Capsaicin or sea salt are very complimentary to chocolate IMHO. Also, caramel and chocolate make a good pair.
I'll give you salt. And caramel can be ok.
Capsaicin detracts from anything; its evolutionary purpose is to deter mammals from eating things. Pain and irritation in the mouth doesn't exactly make you taste things better. I guess if something tasted unpleasant, burning your mouth until you could barely taste it might be considered an improvement if you had a high pain threshold.
Mint works really well too
I couldn't say objectively. I personally cannot bear mint chocolate. It makes me physically sick.
-
-
My export also failed. I guess that means something is going on...
:/
-
Hopefully a database backup.
And with that, I'm seriously out. I have electric sheep to dream of.
-
-
Some kind of reference?!
-