Lbl_technicalerror_topic_title
-
lbl_technicalerror_explanitory_text
lbl_technicalerror_end_of_post.
-
lbl_reply
-
lbl_forgot_to_process_template
-
-
lbl_typos_in_prod_dismissal
-
lbl_technicalerror_user_is_doing_it_wrong
-
-
-
img_nice_chick
-
Yeah... I'd like to "lbl_technicalerror_and_chill" with her, if you get my meaning.
-
img_irish_girl
-
-
-
lbl_descriptive_bodyPostureComfortLevel: txt_input_levelOfBodyComfort[default:-1]
-
lbl_dwarf_fortress_reference
-
lbl_dwarf_fortress_reference
E_INVALID_TOKEN Dwarf Fortress not allowed in WTDWTF mode.
-
-
@wft said:
img_nice_chick
lbl_volkswagen_back_of
lbl_technicalerror_emissions_threshold_exceeded_warning
-
-
lbl_off_topic_comment
-
The TRWTF here is the inconsistent naming convention. We have a mixture of styles from:
lable_technical_error_text
through:
labletechincalerrortext; lbl_tec_err_txt; etc
to:
lbltecerrtext
I bet there is a variable called label_technicalerror_text sulking around somewhere complaining about not being used.
INB4: Yes I know there is a lable / label debate. I was just adding to the confusion. Maybe somebody thought it was a bright idea to use the "abbreviation" lbl to sidestep it...
-
The TRWTF here is the inconsistent naming convention.
lbl_failing_to_follow_convention.
To be honest I'm surprised it took this long for people to (seriously) stop doing it...
-
-
-
4 posts were merged into an existing topic: Status
-
Lable, label... Go for labia!
-
ladle_for_sauce_2
-
lbl_eight_pointed_black_star