Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs
-
@Magus said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
@ScholRLEA said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Everything people think of as politics are things that would have happened anyway - and yes, that includes wars and pogroms and all other kinds of atrocities, the politics may be used to justify it but it doesn't cause it.
So everything people think of as politics is literally politics, which is why it's not politics? CSB
Meh, I'm doing a shitty job of explaining it, sure. Hey, it's not as if people like Diogenes and Prince Siddhartha didn't say the same shit long before I did, anyway; they were both fuckloads more eloquent than I am and people still didn't get it fnord.
-
@DogsB said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Get otter here! Boobs as far as I'm concerned are a very important part of the future of mankind!
@Sentenryu said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
@Onyx to be fair, a future about boobs could only be good.
Fuck you, you both know what I meant, stop constructing strawmen!
Actually, wait... do they have boobs? If so, construct away!
-
@ScholRLEA Stupid, stupid, stupid... why did I even say anything in the first place? I am such an idiot.
The problem is, I loathe politics, and seeing the way people talk about it pisses me the fuck off - too many people make all sorts of ludicrous comments about it, including myself - but it fascinates me, too, like the way a three-year-old gets fascinated with poop. I should know better.
Sorry, TDWTF, it's no you, it's me. If I could ragequit my psychological problems, I would, but instead I think I need to leave the forum instead - not out of anger, but because I'll just keep acting like a fucking addict of I don't.
-
@ScholRLEA said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Sorry, TDWTF, it's no you, it's me. If I could ragequit my psychological problems
Actually, your brain craves information.
Even if it's shitty information.
So, you're WAI.
-
@DogsB said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
@boomzilla @Polygeekery and @xaade being the only three open conservatives I can think of rarely if ever talk or imply shit like this.
I am not strictly conservative. I am more libertarian-leaning. My views on religion, drugs and abortion pretty much exclude me from being called a conservative. ;)
-
why worry with unlikely military action if we ignore the clear threat of a human caused climate change apocalypse
-
@Polygeekery said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
I am not strictly conservative. I am more libertarian-leaning. My views on religion, drugs and abortion pretty much exclude me from being called a conservative.
YMBNH
-
@Jaloopa said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
they'll still jump on it.
O! U! C! H!
-
@antiquarian said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
YMBNH
True. Despite claims by some that these forums are run by conservatives, the only qualification you need to get that title around here is to be more conservative than Hugo Chavez.
-
@Polygeekery said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Despite claims by some that these forums are run by conservatives
Lefties just aren't used to people actually challenging them and they certainly aren't used to making coherent arguments to support their views.
Probably thinking too much about BOOBs to realize that they are boobs.
-
@boomzilla said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Lefties just aren't used to people actually challenging them
That's what happens when you never hear a coherent argument for the counter position
-
@Polygeekery CONSERVATIVE ABUSE!
If anyone is doubting this, we're not even allowed on lawns any more!
-
@Jaloopa said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
@boomzilla said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Lefties just aren't used to people actually challenging them
That's what happens when you never hear a coherent argument for the counter position
Yeah, I'm still waiting after thousands of posts from you guys.
-
@boomzilla said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
I'm still waiting after thousands of posts from
you guysFox
-
@anotherusername said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
if I turn her around and don't see giant boobs coming out of her back, I'm calling shenanigans on that left diagram.
If you turn her around and she happens to have a sexy butt, you might forget about the size of her boobs and that diagram altogether.
-
@boomzilla said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Lefties just aren't used to people actually challenging them and they certainly aren't used to making coherent arguments to support their views.
Love you too <3
-
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
sexy butt
Not everyone is into those.
-
@aliceif said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Not everyone is into those.
I'll never understand that. I'm a butt person. Butt and face determine whether I find someone attractive or not, I really don't care about the rest.
-
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Butt and face determine whether I find someone attractive or not, I really don't care about the rest.
I'll never understand that.
-
@aliceif said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
I'll never understand that.
I guess we'll never have to fight over anyone, then.
-
@asdf you don't know what you're missing
-
@Jarry said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
you don't know what you're missing
???
Why do you think I'm missing out on something? It's not that I don't look at other body parts as well… I just don't find them incredibly important for determining whether a person is attractive or not. Boobs, for example, are great in (almost) all sizes and shapes.
-
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Butt and face determine whether I find someone attractive or not, I really don't care about the rest.
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
It's not that I don't look at other body parts as well… I just don't find them incredibly important for determining whether a person is attractive or not.
I can't help but notice you said nothing about penises.
I know, I know. The guacamole thread is :arrows:.
-
@anotherusername said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
I can't help but notice you said nothing about penises.
That's an accurate observation.
-
@asdf so are you bi, or just down to party if you should happen to meet an attractive woman who has a penis?
-
@anotherusername said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
so are you bi
I wasn't planning on ever mentioning that on this forum, and it's probably a bad idea that I am now, but yes. I am attracted to people, not only to a single sex.
BTW: I find both ends of the Kinsey scale equally confusing; I simply don't get how people can only be attracted to a single sex.
@anotherusername said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
or just down to party if you should happen to meet an attractive woman who has a penis
No idea, I have no first-hand experience with that kind of situation. Even to me, it would be a bit confusing.
-
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Why do you think I'm missing out on something?
do you use a mechanical or membrane keyboard?
-
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
I am attracted to people, not only to a single sex.
I am terrified of people and also sex.
-
@ben_lubar Ah, so that's why you play Dwarf Fortress :P
-
@ben_lubar said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
sex.
You can wash the fluids off afterwards, Ben. They don't stain.
-
@ben_lubar have you been diagnosed with something or are you exaggerating?
-
@fbmac said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
@ben_lubar have you been diagnosed with something or are you exaggerating?
Am I not allowed to make jokes anymore?
-
@ben_lubar said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
Am I not allowed to make jokes anymore?
Were you ever?
-
@ben_lubar Well, I heard they were considering putting dwarf fortress and lojban on the next edition of the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (aka DSM)
-
@fbmac said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
@ben_lubar Well, I heard they were considering putting dwarf fortress and lojban on the next edition of the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (aka DSM)
As well as excessive post deletion?
-
@loopback0 said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
As well as excessive post deletion?
Pfft. That one is getting added retroactively to a previous edition!
-
@fbmac said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
do you use a mechanical or membrane keyboard?
Yes.
(I have a mechanical keyboard at home, but only because it was the only good ergonomic keyboard I could find, and I needed one for medical reasons. It's nice, but I really don't give a shit about the type of keyboard as long as it's comfortable to use.)
-
@ben_lubar said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
I am terrified of people and also sex.
That's true for an estimated 83% of this forum's members. Most of us studied computer science. :P
-
-
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
BTW: I find both ends of the Kinsey scale equally confusing; I simply don't get how people can only be attracted to a single sex.
It's a pain. 50-ish % of the population is immediately filtered out from the selection pool
-
@Onyx said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
It's a pain. 50-ish % of the population is immediately filtered out from the selection pool
Same here. You're forgetting that only a small percentage (guesstimate: 2%) of all men are openly gay or bi.
-
@asdf still extra 2%!
Kidding aside, since I can't really affect it I just don't worry about it that much as long as I don't bother anyone and no one else bothers me about it
-
This post is deleted!
-
@CarrieVS You just replied to my post and insta-deleted your reply. Are you related to @fbmac, by any chance?
-
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
I find both ends of the Kinsey scale equally confusing; I simply don't get how people can only be attracted to a single sex.
MY PEOPLE!!!!
(I mentioned something to that effect here, what, a month ago? and got blank stares.)
-
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
@CarrieVS You just replied to my post and insta-deleted your reply. Are you related to @fbmac, by any chance?
No, I just get confused between the Discard and Submit buttons. I keep assuming submit is the first in line and not looking properly. But usually I do it the other way around so no-one ever knows.
-
@Yamikuronue said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
I mentioned something to that effect here, what, a month ago? and got blank stares.
People have gotten used to the idea that same-sex attraction is a thing, but telling people you're bisexual still seems to confuse them. Whenever I tell someone, I get one of the following reactions:
- The other person assumes I am gay and too afraid to admit it.
- The other person assumes I'm heterosexual and just want to experiment.
- The other person doesn't believe me, because I'm flirting with women all the time. (No shit, sherlock! Finding a single, attractive and indubitably gay man outside of a gay bar is even harder than finding attractive, single women. And I really don't need the embarassment of getting rejected by a heterosexual man.)
- One ex-girlfriend broke up with me because she was convinced that being bisexual means that you want to constantly have sex with both women and men and that she therefore wouldn't be able to satisfy me. (WTF? I don't even…)
The whole concept seems to be very confusing to people.
-
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
The whole concept seems to be very confusing to people.
They are at least usually aware of it being a thing that exists, though. And you can accurately fill out an equal opportunity monitoring form.
-
@CarrieVS said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
equal opportunity monitoring form
Those things are super-weird. I don't think they exist anywhere outside the US.
-
@asdf said in Many U.S. government leaders remain vulnerable to BOOBs:
I don't think they exist anywhere outside the US.
I'm outside the US.
Tell me, do the American ones at least have an 'other' option for orientation? I've never seen one that does in the UK. They have 'prefer not to say' of course, but that's not the same thing.
