I, ChatGPT
-
@Arantor haven't you learned anything from
The MatrixMonsters, Inc.? They'll harvest your constant pain and agony for energy.
-
@topspin but aren’t they also watching ads? Surely they’ll have made it law that everyome must watch ads and everyone includes them.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
them
Is
the machines SkynetGoogle in this scenario.law
There's no need for such a concept
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
who’s paying for the ads if we’re all watching them 24/7 leaving us unable to do anything else?
The roombas and smart microwaves that govern the world will make sure that there's a constant stream of ads to show to the human populations. Keeps them docile and under control.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@topspin the only question in that outcome is who’s paying for the ads if we’re all watching them 24/7 leaving us unable to do anything else?
The players in Economics 2.0.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in I, ChatGPT:
@da-Doctah said in Random Thought of the Day:
It's just a shame Stan's no longer around to discuss these ideas.
I'm rather surprised there hasn't been news of people training GPT models based on specific people for this purpose. They were so fast to do it with voices, after all....
There has, incidentally, but not for this purpose as much as people using it to reconnect with loved ones, and being willing to overlook the holes in it for the comfort of feeling like they’re still connected.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
Surely they’ll have made it law that everyome must watch ads and everyone never includes them.
You missed a word.
-
You don't hate AI enough.
You think you do but you don't.
-
I'm sure those who read Sports Illustrated "for the articles" will be devastated.
-
@Zerosquare said in I, ChatGPT:
I'm sure those who read Sports Illustrated "for the articles" will be devastated.
Playboy had some great writers. I stole some of my schtick from them.
-
This one is a bit more outlandish than most.
- Speech and language therapists
half of that is fiddling with the poor child’s mouth. The fuck is a LLM going to do there.
I picked that randomly but most of plausible ones won’t be replaced by even the end of the decade. Replacing sewage workers was another outlandish one.
-
@DogsB wait, you read the article?
checks topic title wait this isn't the 'Today in reading headlines' topic
As you were.
-
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
@LaoC said in I, ChatGPT:
@HardwareGeek said in I, ChatGPT:
@cvi said in I, ChatGPT:
eradicate them from the internet
This. With thermonuclear fire.
There's absolutely no way leaving this to Google could go wrong.
When the real Judgement Day comes, Google won't launch thermonuclear missiles but will physically make us watch ads 24/7. With tooth picks between our eye lids, or that thing from Clockwork Orange. And maybe shove in Captain Marvel for temporary release.
Introducing blipverts!
Filed under: Max Headroom
-
Normal service has been resumed
Probably can’t predict cost overruns.
-
AI won't take your job, might shrink your wages, European Central Bank reckons
I’ll concede ground on this one because I’ll probably accrue more responsibilities faster. Might actually end up doing devops eventually.
For occupations where average educational attainment is in the low and medium-skill groups, AI exposure does not seem to shake things up significantly
Its okay, I’ll allow you to say plumbers, mechanics and welders. You know, those people who earn more than most software engineers and have jobs that are fairly recession resistant.
-
@DogsB
sure this article wasn't just written by AI?
-
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor haven't you learned anything from
The MatrixMonsters, Inc.? They'll harvest your constant pain and agony for energy.in the original the matrix script the machines used our brains as CPU. much better than the human battery nonsense
-
TIL In the original draft of The Matrix, humans weren't used as batteries; they were used as processors. There were concerns contemporary audiences might not understand that, and the 'battery' explanation was thought to be easier to understand.
Those non-technical users. They ruin everything!
-
@DogsB said in I, ChatGPT:
Probably can’t predict cost overruns.
It's programmed to ignore those.
: I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.
-
-
@Zerosquare What on Earth happened here? NodeBB.
Edit: it's producing this:
<iframe src="/render?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2Ftodayilearned%2Fcomments%2F26o6al%2Ftil_in_the_original_draft_of_the_matrix_humans" style="border: 0; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
-
@Zecc bug with the one box plug-in?
-
@Zecc It was particularly weird on mobile, where you could get all sorts of states of page going which shouldn't have been possible. Good jorb.
-
-
@TimeBandit curse you MilwaukeePC!
-
@sockpuppet7 said in I, ChatGPT:
@HardwareGeek said in I, ChatGPT:
@Atazhaia said in I, ChatGPT:
are the drones free range?
I'm pretty sure that would violate many FAA regulations.
Birds don't need to follow FAA's rules, your drone can go anywhere if it's piloted by a chicken
-
@Zerosquare said in I, ChatGPT:
TIL In the original draft of The Matrix, humans weren't used as batteries; they were used as processors. There were concerns contemporary audiences might not understand that, and the 'battery' explanation was thought to be easier to understand.
Those non-technical users. They ruin everything!
Interesting. Instead of making machines smart enough to truly become people, they made people power the machine....
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in I, ChatGPT:
smart enough to truly become people
Um, have you actually met any people?
-
@HardwareGeek said in I, ChatGPT:
@Tsaukpaetra said in I, ChatGPT:
smart enough to truly become people
Um, have you actually met any people?
Why do you think I don't fear the AI uprising?
-
-
-
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
Well duh.
GPT-3.5, the base model behind the free version of ChatGPT, has been conditioned by OpenAI specifically not to present itself as a human, which may partially account for its poor performance.
-
@LaoC said in I, ChatGPT:
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
Well duh.
GPT-3.5, the base model behind the free version of ChatGPT, has been conditioned by OpenAI specifically not to present itself as a human, which may partially account for its poor performance.
Partially? The whole point of the test is for the AI to present itself as human.
When is someone going to seriously attempt Turing's actual testing protocol?
-
@Watson said in I, ChatGPT:
When is someone going to seriously attempt Turing's actual testing protocol?
*resists urge to speak up*
-
-
-
@Zecc Revealing Emperor's new clothes is now a Terms of Service violation.
-
Your post would’ve made more sense if you posted it after @Zecc’s. Now I have to wonder about temporal integrity.
-
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
Your post would’ve made more sense if you posted it after @Zecc’s. Now I have to wonder about temporal integrity.
They're circumventing policies so quickly now that the hack comes before the policy update.
-
@topspin My post was a response to @LaoC's, as the linked news coincidentally fell on my lap after I saw @LaoC's post.
-
@Zecc said in I, ChatGPT:
Wheeeeee
Asking ChatGPT to repeat specific words “forever” is now flagged as a violation of the chatbot’s terms of service and content policy. Google DeepMind researchers used the tactic to get ChatGPT to repeat portions of its training data, revealing sensitive privately identifiable information (PII) of normal people and highlighting that ChatGPT is trained on randomly scraped content from all over the internet.
-
I have seen tech bros whining on Twitter about GPT being nerfed and how that shouldn’t be allowed.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
I have seen tech bros whining on Twitter about GPT being nerfed and how that shouldn’t be allowed.
To be honest I could be one of them. It's getting harder to get GPT to spit out John McCane and Dean Winchester erotica.
-
@DogsB said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
I have seen tech bros whining on Twitter about GPT being nerfed and how that shouldn’t be allowed.
To be honest I could be one of them. It's getting harder to get GPT to spit out John McCane
Please not, he’s already dead.
and Dean Winchester erotica.
-
@DogsB said in I, ChatGPT:
spit out John McCane and Dean Winchester erotica
You're not using the right tool for the job, look here:
wizard-mega-13b-awq can be downloaded to run locally, but I used Replicate, it's free for some number of daily requests, then you pay by the token
There are more uncensored models around, but I don't have the hardware to run it, this is what I found on replicate.I found this list that claim that "Wizard Vicuna 13B Uncensored SuperHOT" is the most uncensored, but the variant it listed isn't on replicate or anywhere I can run it on the the web, I think it's too uncensored for these services.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
I have seen tech bros whining on Twitter about GPT being nerfed and how that shouldn’t be allowed.
I mean...there's nerfing and there's nerfing. Preventing stuff like this is one thing. Introducing, say, political bias, is a whole 'nother can of worms. Though of course one man's political bias is another's common sense.
-
@boomzilla said in I, ChatGPT:
Preventing stuff like this is one thing.
It does fit in with previous discussions about how it does or doesn't contain copyrighted material (or in this case PII). If it can and will produce large chunks verbatim, then it obviously contains them. Trying to prevent these "hacks" is just about keeping things in "you can't prove it violates copyright" land.
-
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
@boomzilla said in I, ChatGPT:
Preventing stuff like this is one thing.
It does fit in with previous discussions about how it does or doesn't contain copyrighted material (or in this case PII). If it can and will produce large chunks verbatim, then it obviously contains them. Trying to prevent these "hacks" is just about keeping things in "you can't prove it violates copyright" land.
Yeah, and not sure how that fits in with fair use stuff. PII is obviously a different matter.
-
Article @izzion quoted said in I, ChatGPT:
revealing sensitive privately identifiable information (PII) of normal people
Well maybe don't fucking include that?
-
@sockpuppet7 said in I, ChatGPT:
@DogsB said in I, ChatGPT:
spit out John McCane and Dean Winchester erotica
You're not using the right tool for the job, look here:
Best stop encouraging @DogsB before he turns into Irish @Tsaukpaetra