Short and Sweet: Steam's Schrödinger's messages, and dishonest lying liars who lie
-
@boomzilla said:
There's a lot more wrong with Europe than the US, which is part of why my European ancestors came here in the first place.
No shit. It's like Europeans forget that most of us are from Europe. The smart, ambitious ones got the fuck out when they had the chance. That also explains why we tend to not give a shit about Europe and its claimed importance; we don't like you, we risked death in a strange land just to get the fuck away from you.
-
@morbiuswilters said:
The weird thing is, I've never seen a smoke detector that was affected by cigarette smoke.
A year or two ago, our company had a fire alarm go off and we all had to evacuate, due to what turned out to be someone smoking in one of the ground floor toilets and setting off the detector. (We also had it go off several times when there was construction work going on on one floor.) So it does happen with some types of detector. I believe most modern smoke detectors for the home are more discriminating, though.
@Zecc said:Today Firefox 6.0 told me "you have the latest version available".
What it actually should have told me was "this computer's ethernet cable is unplugged, so I can't check if there are any updates".
I think it's reasonable to argue that if your computer's not connected to the Internet, the updates are not available.
-
@Scarlet Manuka said:
@Zecc said:
Today Firefox 6.0 told me "you have the latest version available".
What it actually should have told me was "this computer's ethernet cable is unplugged, so I can't check if there are any updates".
I think it's reasonable to argue that if your computer's not connected to the Internet, the updates are not available.Well played, dickweed. Though to be fair, they could have clarified that it had the most recent available only on his computer, not necessarily the actual most recent available from the Mozilla update server.
-
@boomzilla said:
@Severity One said:
Put it another way: what significant contribution have the USA made to world cuisine, other than fast food? And even the fast food comes from Europe: hamburgers, frankfurters and wieners are all named after German or Austrian cities; then there are French fries (also sometimes known as freedom fries) and pizza.
I'd say that our biggest contribution was in figuring out how to make enough safe food to feed lots and lots of people. Fast food is a part of that, of course. I'd rather be stuck eating McDonalds and KFC for the rest of my life than the best European gourmet food while having to rely on shitty (organic!) farming and preservation practices. Of course, Europe leads the way in trying to keep the brown man hungry and malnourished (viz protests against GMOs).
The main reason why there's a lot of good food in America (talking recipes and menus now) is, of course, all of the immigrants who bring different ideas about food, which then get combined and spread around. It doesn't matter who invented some sort of food, but whether you can get it or not. Not that there aren't some uniquely awesome American dishes, like BBQ. I like caesar salads, too.
Most people over look some of the foods that America invented, one quick google search and I found this:
The Top 10 Foods Only America Could Have Invented -
Photo: Emdot When it comes to food, America gets a bad rap. It's a common refrain that America has no cuisine to call our own. We've got apple pie and hot dogs, but that's about it. (And when you really get down to it, the Germans invented hot dogs, and the British were eating apple
Two on the list that pwn pretty much any food that Europe invented: Philly Cheesesteak and Smores.
Eat that Europe!
-
@Anketam said:
Problem is that you cant be in all of those different places at the same time, yet you are taking a lot of regional issues that USA has combining them all together. I could easily take all the worse elements from the countries you list and come up with the same argument against Europe. USA not only has a large number of good things about it, it also at an overall level is much better than any country in Europe.
One problem I've noticed a lot of us Europeans having when discussing the USA is that we treat it like a country. It's not a country. It's a huge-ass place with 50 countries inside it. Yes, they all speak a mostly similar language, but they're not one nation. People should think of each state as its own country with its own tradition and nationality. This mental disconnect might stem from the fact that Europe started from lots of small countries that have just now learned to share and not kill each other (now we capitalise each other), while the USA started with a few colonials from a couple of nations and through sheer size ended up with local communities which developed into their own distinct nations. In short, if you're European, imagine your country. Now think of regional differences within it. Now multiply the size of each small distinct community by 50. Well, that's the USA. Huge swaths of land inhabited by 50 different kinds of huge swaths of retard.
-
@Mo6eB said:
One problem I've noticed a lot of us Europeans having when discussing the USA is that we treat it like a country. It's not a country. It's a huge-ass place with 50 countries inside it. Yes, they all speak a mostly similar language, but they're not one nation. People should think of each state as its own country with its own tradition and nationality.
That's not quite right either. It definitely started out that way. And it's not that there aren't major regional differences, but reality is somewhere in between. It's a lot more cohesive than Europe as a whole, but the entirety of it is, but not nearly as much as the mini-countries in Europe. And even then, we have states bigger than many countries (population and territory).
In a lot of ways, and largely due to improved communication and transportation, we're more regionally integrated, culturally and politically, than ever before.
-
@morbiuswilters said:
Which is fine, but I still think it should be up to the restaurant/bar owner if they want to permit smoking. I'd prefer they didn't, though.
It is pretty much illegal to smoke in any kind of business in SA and I believe across the country as well. It's getting to the point where if you're in a public space under a roof, it is either illegal or soon to be illegal to smoke there (it will be illegal to smoke at any covered bus stop\interchange as of the end of the month, most shopping centres don't let you smoke near the doors with lines painted on the ground that you need to stand on one side of if you want to smoke and etc.)
-
@boomzilla said:
@Mo6eB said:
If you want a more precise description of "somewhere in between", check out Joel Garreau's The Nine Nations of North America.One problem I've noticed a lot of us Europeans having when discussing the USA is that we treat it like a country. It's not a country. It's a huge-ass place with 50 countries inside it. Yes, they all speak a mostly similar language, but they're not one nation. People should think of each state as its own country with its own tradition and nationality.
That's not quite right either. It definitely started out that way. And it's not that there aren't major regional differences, but reality is somewhere in between. It's a lot more cohesive than Europe as a whole, but the entirety of it is, but not nearly as much as the mini-countries in Europe. And even then, we have states bigger than many countries (population and territory).
In a lot of ways, and largely due to improved communication and transportation, we're more regionally integrated, culturally and politically, than ever before.
-
@Anketam said:
<p[> Not making the list but invented in America and damn good eating:Most people over look some of the foods that America invented, one quick google search and I found this:
The Top 10 Foods Only America Could Have Invented -
Photo: Emdot When it comes to food, America gets a bad rap. It's a common refrain that America has no cuisine to call our own. We've got apple pie and hot dogs, but that's about it. (And when you really get down to it, the Germans invented hot dogs, and the British were eating apple
Two on the list that pwn pretty much any food that Europe invented: Philly Cheesesteak and Smores.
Eat that Europe!
- seafood gumbo
- potato chips
- banana pudding
- corn bread
- ice cream cones
-
@Douglasac said:
@morbiuswilters said:
Which raises the question - if they want to ban it so much, why don't they just make it illegal? Totally. (Snide comment - like they have with, say, cocaine, hash, terrorism.)Which is fine, but I still think it should be up to the restaurant/bar owner if they want to permit smoking. I'd prefer they didn't, though.
It is pretty much illegal to smoke in any kind of business in SA and I believe across the country as well. It's getting to the point where if you're in a public space under a roof, it is either illegal or soon to be illegal to smoke there (it will be illegal to smoke at any covered bus stop\interchange as of the end of the month, most shopping centres don't let you smoke near the doors with lines painted on the ground that you need to stand on one side of if you want to smoke and etc.)
-
@PJH said:
Which raises the question - if they want to ban it so much, why don't they just make it [tobacco] illegal? Totally.
On the off chance that this wasn't 100% trolling, a big answer is that they love the tax revenue. Also, the lessons of Prohibition haven't totally faded.
-
@boomzilla said:
@PJH said:
Which raises the question - if they want to ban it so much, why don't they just make it [tobacco] illegal? Totally.
On the off chance that this wasn't 100% trolling, a big answer is that they love the tax revenue. Also, the lessons of Prohibition haven't totally faded.
In Canada, they raised the taxes on cigarettes so high, that it caused a lot of smuggling -- particularly across the St. Lawrence. The smuggling problem was bad enough, that the Prime Minister at the time, Jean Chrétien, lowered the taxes. The problem subsided.
Now everytime smoking issues come up, the anti-smokers keep saying raising the taxes will cause people to stop smoking. NO IT WON'T. Smokers will just find other ways. These anti-smokers do not learn from history.
-
-
-
@PJH said:
Which raises the question - if they want to ban it so much, why don't they just make it illegal? Totally. (Snide comment - like they have with, say, cocaine, hash, terror
I imagine that this is their end goal, but I wouldn't think there's a huge rush to do so... the amount of money the government makes on taxes on cigarettes would be substantial. Also, making it illegal would just push it underground (like with cocaine, hash and terrorism) so the problem could become worse in a way.
-
@Douglasac said:
Also, making it illegal would just push it underground (like with cocaine, hash and terrorism) so the problem could become worse in a way.
Yeah, making terrorism illegal was a big mistake. If they had any sense, they'd make it legal but just tax and regulate it, like with beer.
-
@morbiuswilters said:
@JoeCool said:
At least, that's what history has taught us so far.These anti-smokers do not learn from history.
Dude, nobody learns from history.
-
@morbiuswilters said:
Yeah, making terrorism illegal was a big mistake. If they had any sense, they'd make it legal but just tax and regulate it
Before you know it, c-4 and plane tickets will be subsidized under the 2013 act of "Ideological Demolition", and people can taxt-deduct donations to such an organization because it's a not-for-profit.
It's a major hassle to get all the permits in order for a high-rise commercial building in the 10-40 floor subrange.
-
@dhromed said:
So much paperwork and so many fees... it's getting a bit unreal, especially if all you want to do is destroy a building because someone in another nation is opposed to your views.@morbiuswilters said:
Yeah, making terrorism illegal was a big mistake. If they had any sense, they'd make it legal but just tax and regulate it
Before you know it, c-4 and plane tickets will be subsidized under the 2013 act of "Ideological Demolition", and people can taxt-deduct donations to such an organization because it's a not-for-profit.
It's a major hassle to get all the permits in order for a high-rise commercial building in the 10-40 floor subrange.
-
@morbiuswilters said:
True, it's more than Malta, but Malta could spend 100% of its GDP on defense and still end up conquered by an ambitious Boy Scout troop.
Well, for that you need to understand Maltese politics, which I presume you don't want to, and you'd be right. Malta, in its constitution, states that it's an neutral country, llike Switzerland, Sweden and Ukraine. Thing is, all those countries can defend themselves: the Swiss are very good at making guns, the Swedes manufacture their own aeroplanes, and as for Ukraine, well, who would want to invade that anyway?With all due respect to the Armed Forces of Malta, their funding is pathetic. I think that the USA spent more on Maltese defence than Malta did, at least until that business with the International Court of Justice, and the USA punishing countries that were not willing to sign an agreement not to extradite US citizens to said court. In my opinion, the national defence is based that it's a very strategically located place (although the significance of that has decreased considerably since WW2, with long-distance flights and aircraft carriers) and that it would be a bit of a bugger if some North African state decided to occupy it.
And it did come in handy that it has an airport big enough to have any sized aircraft land (the only thing that hasn't visited is the An-225, but the An-124, A380, B52, they've all been here) when they were bombing Libya, with the French, the French, the British, the French, the French, the Americans, the French, the French and the French making emergency landings.
Just because I happen to live here doesn't mean I agree with its military spending (or rather, lack thereof). :)
-
@morbiuswilters said:
@boomzilla said:
Um, you're conveniently forgetting the religious fanatics and the outcasts: those Irish that couldn't get enough potatoes from the soil, or those Sicilians that would otherwise have ended up on the business end of a shotgun. Quite a few people that emigrated were the kind that had no future in Europe. And things haven't changed: those crossing the Mexican-US border aren't exactly the kind packing PhDs in their resumés. As for the religious fanatics, well, I rest my case.There's a lot more wrong with Europe than the US, which is part of why my European ancestors came here in the first place.
No shit. It's like Europeans forget that most of us are from Europe. The smart, ambitious ones got the fuck out when they had the chance. That also explains why we tend to not give a shit about Europe and its claimed importance; we don't like you, we risked death in a strange land just to get the fuck away from you.
-
@morbiuswilters said:
@Severity One said:
And when I say "fastest front-wheel drive car around the Nordschleiffe", it's faster than a BMW M6, Audi RS4 or Porsche Boxter - all cars that are considerably more expensive.
I call extreme bullshit. 1) FWD drive is shit for high-performance cars. 2) The biggest powerplant on that Renault is 221hp. 3) The M6 is RWD w/ 560hp. There is no way in hell it's getting smoked by a goddamn FWD Renault. I should know, I'm probably going to buy one soon.
It's actually 265 HP. Anyway, the list of lap times: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nürburgring_Nordschleife_lap_times#Production.2C_street-legal_vehicles
And the video of the Mégane: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7gLhmqq3_4
It has to be said that the Mégane had a very good driver. Whilst most Renaults are pretty average with a questionable reliability record (at least, until recently), the Renault Sport versions are built in France, and an entirely different category. They're extremely well-engineered cars. And I applaud Renault for briging high safety standards across their range, being the first ones with the maximum score for EuroNCAP for any car, a small family car, a supermini, a convertible...
I'm not saying that you should stop liking German cars, but in my opinion, they're bland-looking.
-
@Severity One said:
...and as for Ukraine, well, who would want to invade that anyway?
I would assume the same people as ever. The Russians. I mean, they already kinda are invading using demographics to try to hang on to Sevatopol.
@Severity One said:
@morbiuswilters said:
@boomzilla said:
There's a lot more wrong with Europe than the US, which is part of why my European ancestors came here in the first place.
No shit. It's like Europeans forget that most of us are from Europe. The smart, ambitious ones got the fuck out when they had the chance. That also explains why we tend to not give a shit about Europe and its claimed importance; we don't like you, we risked death in a strange land just to get the fuck away from you.
Um, you're conveniently forgetting the religious fanatics and the outcasts: those Irish that couldn't get enough potatoes from the soil, or those Sicilians that would otherwise have ended up on the business end of a shotgun.I don't see how this contradicts anything Morbs said.
@Severity One said:
As for the religious fanatics, well, I rest my case.
What case?
-
@Severity One said:
and as for Ukraine, well, who would want to invade that anyway?
Seriously? Malta should start teaching history.
@Severity One said:
In my opinion, the national defence is based that it's a very strategically located place (although the significance of that has decreased considerably since WW2, with long-distance flights and aircraft carriers)
Decreased to zero. Your little island was strategically located as a supply depot throughout history, and as a airport during WWII. Considering the ranges of modern ships and aircraft, now its only useful as an emergency landing field... if even that.
@Severity One said:
Just because I happen to live here doesn't mean I agree with its military spending (or rather, lack thereof). :)
Just get Joe-Don Baker back in his Sheriff Geromino costume back out there, he'd toughen you up. It's your move, go ahead on!
-
@Severity One said:
Quite a few people that emigrated were the kind that had no future in Europe.
Duh? That's because Europe was ruled by chuches and monarchies, their lives were literally worth almost nothing, and attempting to effect change only resulted in thousands of people dying and then getting a new, worse, monarch as a result.
@Severity One said:
And things haven't changed: those crossing the Mexican-US border aren't exactly the kind packing PhDs in their resumés.
Have you ever met any? I can assure you, the people crossing the border into the US are, by and large, the best and brightest of Mexico. They don't have PhDs due to lack of opportunity, not lack of intelligence. It's kind of unfortunate, because it's leading to the northern Mexican states becoming less stable, politically, because it's easier to move north (and its by no means easy!) than it is to fight the drug cartels. At least the US Government will just deport you, it won't drown you then dump your body in the middle of the street in front of the state capitol.
@Severity One said:
As for the religious fanatics, well, I rest my case.
You haven't made any case to rest.
-
@Severity One said:
It's actually 265 HP.
When I saw this instead of thinking horse power, I immediately thought of Health Points. I am such a nerd. >_<
-
@morbiuswilters said:
Yeah, making terrorism illegal was a big mistake. If they had any sense, they'd make it legal but just tax and regulate it, like with beer..
Imagine the earnings! You sir, have my vote<FONT face=Arial size=3>@Blakeyrat said:
</FONT>At least the US Government will just deport you, it won't drown you then dump your body in the middle of the street in front of the state capitol.
I'm pretty sure that the Mexican government doesn't either.
<FONT face=Arial size=3>@Anketam said:
</FONT>horse power
You don't wanna know what thoughts are about this
-
@serguey123 said:
<p><span style="FLOAT:none;WORD-SPACING:0px;FONT:12px Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica;TEXT-TRANSFORM:none;TEXT-INDENT:0px;WHITE-SPACE:normal;LETTER-SPACING:normal;TEXT-ALIGN:left;orphans:2;widows:2;-webkit-text-size-adjust:auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width:0px;"><span class="Apple-converted-space"><span style="FLOAT:none;WORD-SPACING:0px;FONT:12px Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica;TEXT-TRANSFORM:none;TEXT-INDENT:0px;WHITE-SPACE:normal;LETTER-SPACING:normal;TEXT-ALIGN:left;orphans:2;widows:2;-webkit-text-size-adjust:auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width:0px;"><font face="Arial" size="3">[quote user="Blakeyrat"]</font>At least the US Government will just deport you, it won't drown you then dump your body in the middle of the street in front of the state capitol.
</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="FLOAT:none;WORD-SPACING:0px;FONT:12px Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica;TEXT-TRANSFORM:none;TEXT-INDENT:0px;WHITE-SPACE:normal;LETTER-SPACING:normal;TEXT-ALIGN:left;orphans:2;widows:2;-webkit-text-size-adjust:auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width:0px;"><span class="Apple-converted-space"><span style="FLOAT:none;WORD-SPACING:0px;FONT:12px Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica;TEXT-TRANSFORM:none;TEXT-INDENT:0px;WHITE-SPACE:normal;LETTER-SPACING:normal;TEXT-ALIGN:left;orphans:2;widows:2;-webkit-text-size-adjust:auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width:0px;">I'm pretty sure that the Mexican government doesn't either.</span></span></span></p>[/quote]... uh? Good job at posting there, buddy.
Anyway, if you had read the sentence preceding the one you quoted, you would realize that the sentence you quoted was referring to the drug cartels and not the Mexican government. I have a lot of respect for the Mexican government.
-
@serguey123 said:
<font face="Arial" size="3">@Blakeyrat said:
</font>At least the US Government will just deport you, it won't drown you then dump your body in the middle of the street in front of the state capitol.
I'm pretty sure that the Mexican government doesn't either.
Do you mean the "official" government, or the people actually running stuff in the localities. Also, the US government may not drown you in Mexico, but they'll make sure the people doing so are well armed.
Also, holy fuck, what did you do to the mark up of your post?!
-
@boomzilla said:
Also, holy fuck, what did you do to the mark up of your post?!
Hypothesis: he copied and pasted from the page, instead of using the quote feature.
Which is strange, since the code says "webkit", and CS doesn't let webkit show Tiny.
-
@blakeyrat said:
Good job at posting there, buddy
It seems IE, Chrome and this site don't mix well, surprise!
@blakeyrat said:
if you had read the sentence preceding the one you quoted, you would realize that the sentence you quoted was referring to the drug cartels and not the Mexican government
Then why mention them so close? Are you implying that violent gangs in the US are above body dumping and drowning or that the actual Mexican government is gangs as opposed to the US?
@boomzilla said:
Do you mean the "official" government
When I picture the unofficial government I always imagine them drinking margaritas and shooting stuff in bermudas and sneakers
-
@serguey123 said:
@blakeyrat said:
if you had read the sentence preceding the one you quoted, you would realize that the sentence you quoted was referring to the drug cartels and not the Mexican government
Then why mention them so close? Are you implying that violent gangs in the US are above body dumping and drowning or that the actual Mexican government is gangs as opposed to the US?
You're just misreading on purpose to get my goat. Please fuck off and die. Thank you.
-
@dhromed said:
Hypothesis: he copied and pasted from the page, instead of using the quote feature.
Yes, I copied from Chrome page into a IE page, because I'm lazy and don't want to write html by hand and the reason I use Chrome most of the time is because the IE we have here is 7. Sadly there are 3 websites I use a lot that don't do well in Chrome :(
BTW is there a better way to quote from different post?
@blakeyrat said:
get my goat
You have a goat? I did not realize you were rich and enjoyed fine company
-
@blakeyrat said:
Getting hacked and leaking CC numbers is, sadly, just a cost-of-business when doing business online at this point.
This attitude is probably the biggest WTF I've seen on this site. And that includes the Paula Bean.
-
@serguey123 said:
@blakeyrat said:
get my goat
You have a goat? I did not realize you were rich and enjoyed fine company
<3
-
@serguey123 said:
BTW is there a better way to quote from different post?
I typically open up a reply tab for each post, and then after clicking the quote button, copy the result from one into the other. That's all in chrome, BTW, so I'm using the raw html editor.
-
@Severity One said:
Thing is, all those countries can defend themselves: the Swiss are very good at making guns, the Swedes manufacture their own aeroplanes
Not to disparage the Swiss or the Swedes, but neither of those countries has the population, firepower or industrial base to sustain a long-term conflict with a moderately powerful foe. If Lichtenstein or Norway get all uppity, sure, they can lay the smack down, but that's about it.
@Severity One said:
...and as for Ukraine, well, who would want to invade that anyway?
The Russians?
@Severity One said:
the only thing that hasn't visited is the An-225, but the An-124, A380, B52, they've all been here
When was this? As I recall, USAF doesn't even operate B-52s out of Europe any more, and didn't use B-52s in Libya, preferring the B-1B, B-2 as well as smaller fighter aircraft.
@Severity One said:
Just because I happen to live here doesn't mean I agree with its military spending (or rather, lack thereof). :)
I mentioned it because you brought up the point that the US spends so much on defense, which I would consider an arguable necessity.
-
@Severity One said:
Anyway, the list of lap times: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nürburgring_Nordschleife_lap_times#Production.2C_street-legal_vehicles
Yeah, I saw that, but the most recent M6 time was from 2005.
@Severity One said:
It has to be said that the Mégane had a very good driver.
Yeah, that's definitely part of it. That 0-60 time on the Renault is 6.3s, compared to under 4s for the M6 (BMW lists it at 4.2s, but they are notorious for giving much higher numbers than tests reveal--I expect it will come in around 3.4s).
@Severity One said:
Whilst most Renaults are pretty average with a questionable reliability record (at least, until recently), the Renault Sport versions are built in France, and an entirely different category. They're extremely well-engineered cars. And I applaud Renault for briging high safety standards across their range, being the first ones with the maximum score for EuroNCAP for any car, a small family car, a supermini, a convertible...
I'm not disputing that they may be well-engineered, I'm just saying that a FWD sports car with 265hp might do very well on the track, but it's not comparable to an M6 or an M3.
@Severity One said:
I'm not saying that you should stop liking German cars, but in my opinion, they're bland-looking.
I like that they are low-key while still having great performance. I really dislike flashy ricer cars.
-
@blakeyrat said:
At least the US Government will just deport you, it won't drown you then dump your body in the middle of the street in front of the state capitol.
Rick Santorum will take care of that!
-
Got another email from Steam:
@Steam Support said:
Hello,
A staff member has replied to your question:
Hello Blakeyrat,
We will investigate this matter and take appropriate action.
Please note that you will not receive a notification about any action taken as a result of this report.
If you have any further difficulty, please let us know.
So basically, it reads, "fuck off and die."
Steam support isn't just bad, it's legendarily bad.
-
@serguey123 said:
BTW is there a better way to quote from different post?
It'll still involve copypasting, but you can open a reply page for as many posts as you like in new tabs or windows.
HAPPY TO HELP.
-
@boomzilla said:
I typically open up a reply tab for each post, and then after clicking the quote button, copy the result from one into the other.
Oh you!
-
@dhromed said:
@boomzilla said:
I typically open up a reply tab for each post, and then after clicking the quote button, copy the result from one into the other.
Oh you!It's OK. Something sensible isn't really said on this site until it's been said several times. Repetition is key to learning, and all that.
BTW, serguey123, if your country can't afford that many tabs (hey, we've all been there!), you should be able to copy from the first reply box, close the tab, then start another one for the next post and paste it into the tab.
-
@morbiuswilters said:
Rick Santorum will take care of that!
If he changes his campaign slogan to "I loathe everything that exists with a surreal passion", the refreshing honesty would get him more votes.
-
@dhromed said:
If he changes his campaign slogan to "I loathe everything that exists with a surreal passion", the refreshing honesty would get him more votes.
I would vote for such a man!
-
@dhromed said:
@morbiuswilters said:
Rick Santorum will take care of that!
If he changes his campaign slogan to "I loathe everything that exists with a surreal passion", the refreshing honesty would get him more votes.
Irrational hatred is a perfectly valid emotion. In fact, some would say it's the most valid.
-
@boomzilla said:
Repetitive beating is key to learning, and all that.
@boomzilla said:
if your country can't afford that many tabs
Sadly we can't, our slogan for this year is: "one goat, one house". That is our long term plan so that one day all can be as rich as blakeyrat.
@boomzilla said:
you should be able to copy from the first reply box, close the tab, then start another one for the next post and paste it into the tab.
The thing is that this site is funky with Chrome (at least for me) and the alternative is IE7 (which work but suckingly so) however I'll take dhromed and yours advice under consideration. Maybe in our next yearly meeting we can add more tabs but it is simply not a priority right now, there are more pressing economical matters to attend.
-
@serguey123 said:
Maybe in our next
yearly meetingGlorious Five Year Plan we can add more tabs but it is simply not a priority right now, there are more pressing economical matters to attend.
FTFY
-
@boomzilla said:
@serguey123 said:
Maybe in our next
yearly meetingQuinquennial Plan we can add more tabs but it is simply not a priority right now, there are more pressing economical matters to attend.
FTFY
FMFYNow it has a more proletarian flair to it.
Glory to the Inmortal leader!
-
@serguey123 said:
Sadly we can't, our slogan for this year is: "one goat, one house".
I applaud your country's social programs for nipping that "homeless goat" problem in the bud.
