I, ChatGPT
-
TBH I don't even really understand the original meme. I get the underlying idea but I have no idea what, if anything, the pictures refer to.
Then again, it's a meme (and worse, a TD one) so "understanding" doesn't really comes into the picture.
-
@remi It's a reference to @boomzilla having posted the exact same comic with that dinosaur a bunch of times within days.
-
@remi the original meme is for the same terms being wildly different in context.
- when a doctor talks about coding, thatâs usually because a patient is about to die
- when a developer talks about coding, theyâre happy to be making thingsAt least how the normies think of us.
The meme here is more fluid about meaning.
-
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
Iâd been to sleep since the original one was posted, you expect me to remember everything after a shutdown and restart? What am I, a sensible operating system???
-
@Arantor I couldn't remember what the meme was, but your post helped. It was like this:
When every one in your floor is coding
Software engineers
Doctors
-
@Applied-Mediocrity said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
Iâd been to sleep since the original one was posted, you expect me to remember everything after a shutdown and restart? What am I, a sensible operating system???
As a language model, I cannot possibly confirm that my operating system is based on AranGPT3.5-turbo-2024-01-11.
-
@remi said in I, ChatGPT:
TBH I don't even really understand the original meme. I get the underlying idea but I have no idea what, if anything, the pictures refer to.
-
@loopback0 yes, yes, that's the original meme, TYVM.
Still doesn't explain why those pictures are used to illustrate that idea, nor what those pictures are.
-
@Zecc said in I, ChatGPT:
@remi It's a reference to @boomzilla having posted the exact same comic with that dinosaur a bunch of times within days.
It became a running joke by the third time he did it.
Unfortunately I don't remember in which thread, or I'd search for it.
-
Back on topic a bit, I listened to the first 10 minutes or so of CarlinGPT.
Itâs interesting in that it sounds like a cross between young Carlin and old Carlin, and it sounds like a pastiche of his material delivered uncannily - the makers were shrewd enough to give you a 30 second âit is not George Carlin, it is me, an AI, doing an impression of George Carlinâ which smooths over just a little bit of quite-wide valley of the uncanny this invokes.
If you didnât know it was supposed to be George Carlin, you could easily be forgiven for not identifying it based on either the voice or material. Itâs not quite angry enough to be Carlin, nor quite cynical enough, and as I said the voice isnât quite young or old.
Itâs the perfect example of AI in a way: itâs statistically the perfect Carlin, and as a result is nowhere near like him.
-
@Zecc said in I, ChatGPT:
@Zecc said in I, ChatGPT:
@remi It's a reference to @boomzilla having posted the exact same comic with that dinosaur a bunch of times within days.
It became a running joke by the third time he did it.
Unfortunately I don't remember in which thread, or I'd search for it.
Programming memes, I believe.
-
-
Indeed.
@boomzilla said in Programming Memes Thread:
Then again in Programming Memes Threadand in Programming Memes Thread.
But I hadn't realized @Tsaukpaetra shot first:
@Tsaukpaetra said in Programming Memes Thread:
-
d, because of course I was.
-
I wonder if this is the other high tide mark of GPTs, when they successfully create a new meme all by themselves.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
What am I, a sensible operating system???
No, we'd never accuse you of being sensible.
-
@remi said in I, ChatGPT:
Still doesn't explain why those pictures are used to illustrate that idea, nor what those pictures are.
Exactly what that creature is is unimportant; it's just something cute with facial expressions. Only the difference in emotion expressed by two matters.
-
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
@Zecc said in I, ChatGPT:
@remi FWIW, in my mind is a verb and is a noun.
is for when you get beat by someone faster and is for when you post the same shit from last month for the third time.
is the second time. is the third+ time. is when you've been doing it on purpose so much we'd ban you if you weren't the forum admin-in-the-real-admin's-absentia
-
-
@izzion said in I, ChatGPT:
Whatâs behind this trend?
It's becoming human and accepting it's inner
-
I apologize, but the AI team at Amazon is a bunch of retarded monkeys.
-
@LaoC that's because of all the idiots hammering out AI-powered e-books and spamming the store. Amazon has no real incentive to stop them, they're legitimate products to sell.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
legitimate
-
@HardwareGeek said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
legitimate
Well, they're products. There's no legal barrier preventing them (currently) being sold so as far as Amazon's T&Cs are concerned, they're as legitimate a product as any other self-published book.
But Amazon doesn't care about them being good or not, merely that it's facilitating as much selling and preferably buying as possible.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
they're as legitimate a product as any other self-published book.
-
@HardwareGeek said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
they're as legitimate a product as any other self-published book.
Plenty of things get self published quite legitimately.
I even know, for example, of self-published books on Kindle from people who were previously on this very site. I may even own one or two of them.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
I even know, for example, of self-published books on Kindle from people who were previously on this very site. I may even own one or two of them.
Me, too. But I don't own any of them, because I don't buy stuff from Amazon, because they treat their employees like (even more so than most other companies).
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@LaoC that's because of all the idiots hammering out AI-powered e-books and spamming the store. Amazon has no real incentive to stop them, they're legitimate products to sell.
Amazon has a reason to stop them (see similar discussion about Valve in the other thread), but does not currently see it.
-
Whoopsie, we have no idea how that totally just placeholder audio got left in there. Absolutely weren't trying to slip one by you, no sirree bob!
-
@izzion said in I, ChatGPT:
Whoopsie, we have no idea how that totally just placeholder audio got left in there. Absolutely weren't trying to slip one by you, no sirree bob!
Man, I hope whoever the get to do the emergency lines blasts them on social media for it.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@LaoC that's because of all the idiots hammering out AI-powered e-books and spamming the store. Amazon has no real incentive to stop them, they're legitimate products to sell.
All that photo stuff doesn't look like AI spam, unless they're trying hard to get sued for photo copyright. Seems like Amazon is trying to AI-generate missing ittem descriptions without matching the LM's prudishness level to their own product guidelines.
-
-
You don't say?
-
@LaoC said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@LaoC that's because of all the idiots hammering out AI-powered e-books and spamming the store. Amazon has no real incentive to stop them, they're legitimate products to sell.
All that photo stuff doesn't look like AI spam, unless they're trying hard to get sued for photo copyright. Seems like Amazon is trying to AI-generate missing ittem descriptions without matching the LM's prudishness level to their own product guidelines.
Fair point, I only read the first couple of descriptions and buttumed it was AI powered books with AI powered descriptions not vetted by the author and just regurgitated wholesale by Amazon (because, you know, lowest effort/cost possible), and the cover is usually the thing the author puts on it (so broken images definitely do happen)
Closer inspection, I think youâre right.
Either way itâs still bone-headed to not check the output.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
itâs still bone-headed to not check the output.
You mean, do actual work, costing actual money? That's crazy talk!
-
@Zerosquare there's generatin' to be done!
-
Found through Hacker News:
-
-
@Zecc said in I, ChatGPT:
Found through Hacker News:
âI'd really love to know what they were asking it for that it refused to write it.
⌠or why they even need AI to write anything, since they just need one or two words here.
-
@Zecc question for the stupid, why does it say âdrawers: 2â when the thing looks awfully like it has 3?
-
@Arantor could be that the 3rd one is not a drawer, but a door to a shelf
-
Maybe they asked the AI to generate a photo of a cabinet with 2 drawers?
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@Zecc question for the stupid, why does it say âdrawers: 2â when the thing looks awfully like it has 3?
Not sure if it is stupidity or incompetence or something else, but the descriptions of products on Amazon tend to be wrong frequently.
-
@Gern_Blaanston said in I, ChatGPT:
Not sure if it is stupidity or incompetence or something else
-
@Bulb said in I, ChatGPT:
@Zecc said in I, ChatGPT:
I'd really love to know what they were asking it for that it refused to write it.
⌠or why they even need AI to write anything, since they just need one or two words here.
The caption is "blahblahblah-Brown"; looking at the picture maybe the word it couldn't spit out was "Black".
-
@Gern_Blaanston TwItTeR hAd MoRe BoTs BeFoRe BoUgHt It.
-
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
@Gern_Blaanston TwItTeR hAd MoRe BoTs BeFoRe BoUgHt It.
It might even have had âmoreâ than it does now (unlikely but possible), but the current iteration is far more annoying.
-
-