WTF Bites
-
@error Don't know it off the top of my head; I'll look it up next time I'm on Windows.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
@Tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
@BernieTheBernie said in WTF Bites:
@TimeBandit said in WTF Bites:
@Polygeekery said in WTF Bites:
Your move.
Grew up with Bryan Adams lol. Accidental memory recall, could not resist.
Surprised we havenât mentioned Summer of 69, named after the position, not the year.
-
@Arantor Unlike 1979 by (The) Smashing Pumpkins, which supposedly is actually about 1982 â but that didnât fit the metre of the song.
-
Surprised we havenât mentioned Summer of 69, named after the position, not the year.
Trying to get confirmation on this I've ended up on the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/69_(sex_position). It's surprisingly graphic. NSFW, if you didn't catch the drift.
-
@Zecc well, Adams himself would have been like 10 years old in 1969 which doesnât bode well for the vibe of the song otherwise.
-
Surprised we havenât mentioned Summer of 69, named after the position, not the year.
According to later claims by Adams, the title is a reference to the sex position, not the year, but Vallance disputes this.
I mean, yes,
Dumbledoreyou, the reader, were gay all along. It's pretty obvious, really.
But this? No man, you can't just make shit up afterwards.
-
@topspin https://uproxx.com/music/is-bryan-adams-summer-of-69-about-what-you-think-it-is/ seems to suggest both interpretations are some definition of correct, like all the best stories.
-
-
@Polygeekery said in WTF Bites:
faked an orgasm
Did you shout like in that Howard Stern prank call?
More like Klingon death shout.
-
@Polygeekery I mean, once you've done a request with
?rs=0123456789ABCDEF&user=...&pwd=...
, can you then do more requests with just?rs=0123456789ABCDEF
.Wait. I was in a hurry when I answered this yesterday and my brain filled in things that were not there in your second highlighted question.
IIRC, I don't think so. Not when doing so programmatically and/or headless. Although this is not something I would have tested much. We send each request with authentication.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
@Polygeekery said in WTF Bites:
faked an orgasm
Did you shout like in that Howard Stern prank call?
More like Klingon death shout.
Do Klingons go "HUUUAAAAAAAH" when they die?
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
@Polygeekery said in WTF Bites:
faked an orgasm
Did you shout like in that Howard Stern prank call?
More like Klingon death shout.
Do Klingons go "HUUUAAAAAAAH" when they die?
No, others do it for them!
-
-
both interpretations are some definition of correct
IOW, it's a song about a summer of 69 during the summer of 1969?
-
@TimeBandit said in WTF Bites:
both interpretations are some definition of correct
IOW, it's a song about a summer of 69 during the summer of 1969?
We haven't had that spirit here since then.
-
@Tsaukpaetra you asked the waiter for wine again, didn't you?
-
@Arantor
Checks out! But just don't leave.
-
-
@dcon
Very, very frighting!
-
-
Many years later, people will look at this section of the thread and scratch their cranial nubs in wonder and confusion...
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
Many years later, people will look at this
section of the threadsite and scratch their cranial nubs in wonder and confusion...
-
@HardwareGeek said in WTF Bites:
@Tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
Many years later, people will look at this
section of the threadsite and scratch their cranial nubs in wonder and confusion...
-
@HardwareGeek said in WTF Bites:
@Tsaukpaetra said in WTF Bites:
Many years later,peoplewilllook at thissection of the threadsite and scratch their cranial nubs inwonder andconfusion...
-
@cvi :also_yes:
-
@HardwareGeek
Even this guy seems confused
-
@Arantor Unlike 1979 by (The) Smashing Pumpkins, which supposedly is actually about 1982 â but that didnât fit the metre of the song.
And then we got 1989 by the pillows, which is a reference to the year the band was formed.
-
More eslint autism: It removes superfluous parentheses from arithmetic expressions. Apparently everyone should be always 100% certain that
<<
has higher priority than&
. And this is being done in the name of code quality.Edit: I think I didn't describe the previous autism here: It shows red wavy lines when you don't sort object keys alphabetically. And there's no automatic sorting available in VSCode, you need to manually sort keys so that
{ name: ..., start: ..., end:...}
becomes{ end: ..., name: ..., start: ...}
, because of course this is higher code quality.
-
@sebastian-galczynski I can't think of a single reason why you'd want keys to be in alphabetical order ever.
Also, this sounds familiar. I believe someone has mentioned this recently.
Yes, there's been at least two mentions of dropdowns with months in alphabetical order, but I'm thinking of keys in JS(ON) specifically.Edit: good grief. Can't right today.
-
@sebastian-galczynski said in WTF Bites:
More eslint autism: It removes superfluous parentheses from arithmetic expressions. Apparently everyone should be always 100% certain that
<<
has higher priority than&
. And this is being done in the name of code quality.All linting/refactoring/code quality tools are retarded. With Resharper being the king of retards.
Unfortunately so many people use them. Use them without thinking, applying all 'suggestions' mindlessly, like sheep that they are. Code gets uglier and less readable constantly, but we maintain high 'code quality', according to current fashion, like some braindead chicks walking in uncomfortable impractical clothes, because it's the style of this season.
-
All linting/refactoring/code quality tools are retarded. With Resharper being the king of retards.
For me, fixing whitespace, indentation or optional commas etc is ok, anything beyond that is annoying.
-
but we maintain high 'code quality', according to current fashion
I don't see the problem.
-
@boomzilla Some "fashion" designers do not merely party with illegal psychotomimetic chemicals; they base their careers on them.
-
@HardwareGeek They look great for the kind of day you want to be left alone.
Middle one looks like the fabric storage boxes from IKEA.
-
@cvi and left one comes with 13 rolls of toilet paper.
That must be expensive!
And stay way from shitters!
-
@BernieTheBernie That said ... I kinda dig the rightmost one. It has that kind of I-don't-give-a-fuck energy, whereas the other ones are just trying too hard. I'd wear it for a day just to see people's faces.
-
@cvi if the giant labia came in a different color...
-
@boomzilla You'd have trouble finding the zipper.
-
Is this a covid costume?
-
@sebastian-galczynski said in WTF Bites:
All linting/refactoring/code quality tools are retarded. With Resharper being the king of retards.
For me, fixing whitespace, indentation or optional commas etc is ok, anything beyond that is annoying.
There are many, many useful checks that actually point out suspicious or outright dangerous code. Possible null-dereferencing, constant conditions (always true, always false), infinite loops, newly created lists that are never read, mixing sync/async/blocking/non-blocking code, etc etc etc
-
@sebastian-galczynski said in WTF Bites:
More eslint autism: It removes superfluous parentheses from arithmetic expressions. Apparently everyone should be always 100% certain that
<<
has higher priority than&
. And this is being done in the name of code quality.That's the opposite of the tool we use (for C++). It forces parens around everything.
if ((!someBool) || (otherbool && (y == 0)))
-
That's the opposite of the tool we use (for C++). It forces parens around everything.
Fun fact: the same guy who wrote the annoying eslint config, years ago criticised me for not using parentheses in something like like
a && b || c && d
, because the analogy between &&,|| and *,+ was not obvious enough. How the turntables...
-
@Arantor Unlike 1979 by (The) Smashing Pumpkins, which supposedly is actually about 1982 â but that didnât fit the metre of the song.
Or Sussudio by Phil Collins, which is a completely made up word that he used as a placeholder while writing the lyrics (because it fit the rhythm of the song).
When he couldn't think of a replacement word, he decided that it would be the name of a girlfriend.
-
@sebastian-galczynski said in WTF Bites:
Edit: I think I didn't describe the previous autism here: It shows red wavy lines when you don't sort object keys alphabetically.
It often makes sense for imports, maps collecting random stuff and such, and the reason is that it's easier to merge, because if two people add the same key, they add it to the same place, so it's obvious it's the same key, and if they add different keys, it usually isn't a conflict.
But for objects âŚ
And there's no automatic sorting available in VSCode, you need to manually sort keys so that
{ name: ..., start: ..., end:...}
becomes{ end: ..., name: ..., start: ...}
, because of course this is higher code quality.⌠it should want the keys to be in the order of declaration instead. And there definitely should be a fix coming with it, otherwise it's pain.
There is one case where we agreed on a project to insist on maintaining the order of declaration: C++ base and member constructors. The thing there is that they are a set of expressions that can be written in any order, but they will be evaluated in the order the members were declared. There writing them in any other order is quite a footgun.
-
There is one case where we agreed on a project to insist on maintaining the order of declaration: C++ base and member constructors. The thing there is that they are a set of expressions that can be written in any order, but they will be evaluated in the order the members were declared. There writing them in any other order is quite a footgun.
GCC and clang (I think) warn on this on -Wall (which I think is a fairly common base choice). MSVC doesn't on /W3, which is the default setting in Visual Studio. So, I tend to see this more in Visual Studio code than GCC/clang.
-
I would like to point out, again, you are working from a laptop on a beach. Not enjoying the beach. Youâve brought expensive electronics to a beach. You are an idiot.
-
you are working from a laptop on a beach. Not enjoying the beach.
Technically, yes. But, you are still getting some beach-enjoyment, however small, while working in an office provides zero beach-enjoyment.
-
@Gern_Blaanston Also, you are well-positioned to fully enjoy the beach at 5 o'clock, rather than possibly requiring multiple hours by car/train/plane/whatever to get there.
That said, I'd prefer working in a room overlooking the beach, rather than being on the beach, with a comfortable, ergonomic chair and a desk with space for keyboard, mouse, and at least one external hi-res monitor, rather than being stuck with the laptop screen, crappy keyboard, and touch-pad/clit-mouse. Also, my focus would be on the beach; it's already bad enough in an office. (And I say this as someone who already works remotely, which I could theoretically do from anywhere with a good internet connection and power for external monitors.)
-
@Gern_Blaanston said in WTF Bites:
while working in an office provides zero beach-enjoyment.
See also: the Midwestern US
-
Is this a covid costume?
It's a celebration of anal prolapse.