The Official Status Thread
-
Currently boggling at how someone has created a query that does 23 terabytes of physical IO, and 8 terabytes of logical IO and takes four hours to run and thinks the query is 'OK'
And then magically four people are running the query simultaneously and bring the database to it's knees, and when asked what the heck is going on over there they all respond they are the only one to be running the query.
Fucking fuck fuck fuck.
-
23 terabytes of physical reads, and 8 terabytes of logical reads and returns 7 records
FTFY?
actually no, that would be a lot worse.....
-shudder-
-
One part of the query takes six minutes to return less than 300 records.
-
Currently boggling at how someone has created a query that does 23 terabytes of physical IO, and 8 terabytes of logical IO and takes four hours to run and thinks the query is 'OK'
And then magically four people are running the query simultaneously and bring the database to it's knees, and when asked what the heck is going on over there they all respond they are the only one to be running the query.
Fucking fuck fuck fuck.
There's your problem, your database is made of knees.
-
We had them specially installed because it wasn't flexible enough.
-
One part of the query takes six minutes to return less than 300 records.
What the Belgium
-
Status: Could hardly keep my eyes open all evening. Now it's almost 2AM and I can't sleep. Fuck.
-
I'm very proud of this:
case "Half-Assed":
-
Relearning how to tie a Windsor knot. Fucking Fuck Fuck. Stuff tomorrow, preparations tonight. Bug reports delayed to tomorrow but not forgotten.
-
What the Belgium
That actually could explain somthing. @Matches stop moving your records over Belgium. The're stuck in traffic.
-
That actually could explain somthing. @Matches stop moving your records over Belgium. The're stuck in traffic.
I can't see any of your post, my work filter is blocking it.
-
I can't see any of your post, my work filter is blocking it.
What are you complaining about? Many would consider that an improvement!
-
-
Status: Considering building some C program manually, because I have to change one of its files many times, and its Makefile is so broken it rebuilds everything every time.
-
Reconsidering the previous idea after seeing that building each file requires a gcc command line sufficiently long to overflow a 117x56 terminal.
-
Status: Wrestling with SharePoint again ...
Munching some snackxxx to keep it tolerable
-
Status: implementing a small feature for a customer.
-
Status: implementing a small feature for a customer.
Famous last words. Right up there with, "Hold my beer."
-
Famous last words. Right up there with, "Hold my beer."
No, it was amazingly easy to implement. Just copy & paste some code from place A into new cgi script B and voila: new feature available!
-
Status: refactoring code to avoid code duplication.
-
Snackxxx the adult snacks.
Eat responsibly.
-
shouldn't that be written:
snaXXX
?
-
shouldn't that be written:
snaXXX
?
Better still: www.sna.xxx. No, I don't know if something exists under that address.
-
Destination url does not exist.
Cum snack and titty muffin store, anyone?
-
something exists there. I'm not asking what.
[code]
accalia@Devbox2:~/html/WB$ ping www.sna.xxx
PING www.sna.xxx (198.105.254.228) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- www.sna.xxx ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2017msaccalia@Devbox2:~/html/WB$ dig www.sna.xxx
; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-3-Ubuntu <<>> www.sna.xxx
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6328
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4000
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.sna.xxx. IN A;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.sna.xxx. 10 IN A 198.105.254.228
www.sna.xxx. 10 IN A 198.105.244.228;; Query time: 52 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.1.1#53(127.0.1.1)
;; WHEN: Wed Sep 17 09:52:23 EDT 2014
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 72
[/code]
-
No, it was amazingly easy to implement. Just copy & paste some code from place A into new cgi script B and voila: new feature available!
TRWTF. Isn't CGI like 1990's stuff?
Or are we discussing "Computer-Generated Imagery" instead of the pre-assumed "Common Gateway Interface"?
-
TRWTF. Isn't CGI like 1990's stuff?
Or are we discussing "Computer-Generated Imagery" instead of the pre-assumed "Common Gateway Interface"?
We are talking Common Gateway Interface. And you don't want to know.
-
-
-
So you made copy & pasta today?
That's the backbone of my diet!Filed under: Only joking, I don't want my code to appear here.
-
Status: Fixed another bug.
-
I don't want my code to appear here.
Oh that is some nasty looking code over there ....
-
something exists there. I'm not asking what.
Even the root domain isn't hosted yet.
[pjh@lenovo ~]$ dig sna.xxx ; <<>> DiG 9.9.3-P2 <<>> sna.xxx ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 27820 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;sna.xxx. IN A ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: xxx. 888 IN SOA a0.xxx.afilias-nst.info. noc.afilias-nst.info. 2011181143 10800 3600 2764800 900 ;; Query time: 1 msec ;; SERVER: 172.16.4.1#53(172.16.4.1) ;; WHEN: Wed Sep 17 16:01:17 BST 2014 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 99
Registration:
[pjh@lenovo ~]$ whois sna.xxx Domain Name:SNA.XXX Domain ID: D781337-AGRS Creation Date: 2012-02-14T16:43:59Z Updated Date: 2014-02-14T22:20:08Z Registry Expiry Date: 2015-02-14T16:43:59Z Sponsoring Registrar:Corehub, S.R.L. (R3202-AGRS) Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 15 WHOIS Server: Referral URL: Domain Status: serverHold Registrant ID:CORE2XXX Registrant Name:LA POSTE la poste Registrant Organization:LA POSTE Registrant Street: CP T301 - 44 Boulevard de Vaugirard Registrant City:PARIS CEDEX 15 Registrant State/Province:FR Registrant Postal Code:75015 Registrant Country:FR Registrant Phone:+33.240127284 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: +33.240123901 Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email:gestint.disit@laposte.fr Admin ID:CORE3XXX Admin Name:LA POSTE la poste Admin Organization:LA POSTE Admin Street: CP T301 - 44 Boulevard de Vaugirard Admin City:PARIS CEDEX 15 Admin State/Province:FR Admin Postal Code:75015 Admin Country:FR Admin Phone:+33.240127284 Admin Phone Ext: Admin Fax: +33.240123901 Admin Fax Ext: Admin Email:gestint.disit@laposte.fr Tech ID:CORE4XXX Tech Name:LA POSTE la poste Tech Organization:LA POSTE Tech Street: CP T301 - 44 Boulevard de Vaugirard Tech City:PARIS CEDEX 15 Tech State/Province:FR Tech Postal Code:75015 Tech Country:FR Tech Phone:+33.240127284 Tech Phone Ext: Tech Fax: +33.240123901 Tech Fax Ext: Tech Email:gestint.disit@laposte.fr Name Server:NS2.NODNSXXX.COM Name Server:NS1.NODNSXXX.COM Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server:
Appears to be these guys:
-
still not clicking that link.
but thanks for the extra data.
-
Appears to be these guys:
(SFW)
That’s the French post office.
Wait, what?
-
That’s the French post office.
Ah - perhaps not then. It's probably a PO-Box that's been listed then...
-
Status: trying to prioritize my currently minuscule workload so that I can stretch it out as long as possible. All the high priority projects I had are being "reevaluated".
-
Ah - perhaps not then. It's probably a PO-Box that's been listed then...
The “Registrant name” seems to imply that it’s indeed La Poste itself which registered the domain. Actually, the whole whois seems identical to the one for laposte.net, safe for the various IDs. Strange...
-
-
mind = blown
Last person I expected to be exhibiting this particular brand of Doing It Wrong.
-
status: marveling at the fact that a google image search for headache pulls up about 400 variations of the same stock photo. I mean it's accurat, but really?
Status:
-
a google image search for "How to use ESP" returns identical results.
-
same set of photos or a different stock photo?
-
Is it accurate? Do people really do that when they have headaches? I sure don't.
-
Headaches, no. Migraines, yes
-
accurate to what i'm doing no, but i don't have migraine (as @jaloopa mentioned)
but it is what people think of when they hear headache (i blame the [insert liberal/conservative labels to taste] media)
-
I had a painful migraine only once ever. I took several kinds of pain medicine and went straight back to bed.
My normal migraines never hurt but cause artifacts and blind spots in my vision, they'd last about 45 minutes to an hour. I used to get one of those about once a year but I'm actually WAY overdue. I wonder what changed.
-
-
I'll go through periods of getting them at least once a week, then go without for months. I always get the splitting headache and often see flashing lights. Nasty buggers
-
Does Discourse have a time machine plugin I'm not aware of? I think it's been at least 2 - 3 years since my last migraine.