Go gets Belgium'd


  • Discourse touched me in a no-no place

    @hungrier said:

    Big "citation needed" on this.

    Aw, come on, if the legion of kids who're killed by frying pans after watching Bugs Bunny cartoons isn't proof that dumb blonde jokes prevents women from getting STEM jobs, I don't know what will convince you.



  • I thought @xaade tried to be funny and meant that women having intercourse with idiots leads to dumb children.



  • To be fair, being raised by one or two idiots is a pretty good way to become an idiot.


  • BINNED

    No, no, not linking, that's a whole new can of worms. But let's just say there are some who don't joke about that. Also, spout a lot of stupid on other subjects.



  • Because reinterpreting an adjective as a verb is funny!

    (are fucking idiots == do fuck idiots)

    Anti-whoosh badge?

    I mean, I know... that's the joke. But with so many whooshes, and the sensitivity of the joke.... sorry.


  • BINNED

    Well, I whoosed fairly and squarely there then. Well played sir.



  • I'll try to put more emphasis on DO as an action verb...?



  • Here's your badge.


  • BINNED

    Nah, it's ok man, my fail. Not being a native speaker probably helped a bit, but I still should have gotten it. @aliceif did, and she's not a native speaker either so...




  • Winner of the 2016 Presidential Election

    @hungrier said:

    @Pharylon said:
    But every "dumb blonde" joke, every adult who praises their looks instead of their smarts, and every kids show where the bookworm is a boy and the ditz is a girl (ie, most of them), is another brick in the wall.

    Big "citation needed" on this.

    Here ya go.

    Less dickweedily, here.

    @Pharylon said:

    if someone uses the word "cis" to describe a straight person, I have a good idea they're pretty deep into the LGBT community. I don't need to hear their long in depth explanation of why we should use that term instead of "straight," or they're not exactly the same or whatever.

    "Cis" doesn't mean straight - it means your gender identity aligns with your assigned sex.

    @Onyx said:

    I usually stay silent about this shit, but tonight... tonight I'm in a bit of a mood. So here goes.

    Split that shit in its own topic if you want, so I can mute it. Same goes with politics and religion. I won't even tell you what my stance on the subject is, because it doesn't fucking matter. This is a god damned techie forum. I'm not saying don't discuss this stuff. Go for it! But split this shit in its own damned topic because you damned well know it's a huge flame and troll bait. And you know it will turn into another rolling 1k+ post thread that goes on, and on, and on, with same actors and same shit over and over again.

    Some of us don't want that shit in our regular damned threads. We come here to bitch and moan about tech and our coworkers, and their damned code. Hell, and ours as well. If I want to discuss this stuff there's damned tumblr, and twitter, and probably 10 fucking 1k+ threads already. And I'll come there when I feel like it.

    Now, do I have to flag shit or can someone please split this so I can argue with @ben_lubar about how Go sucks in god damned honest to nerd peace?

    Given the OP, I'm pretty sure trolling these issues is the intended purpose of this thread. Along with talking about Go. In respect to these issues. But hey, let if Jeff!

    @Onyx said:

    You know what, fuck it.

    Probably for the best, really.

    @Onyx said:

    [Wall-o-Text]

    Oh, you mean that kind of "fuck it.". Well, we don't have any cookies, but, um, we have trains?

    @Spanky587 said:

    Yeah, but half the people are below average.

    Technically, at or below, not simply below.

    @FrostCat said:

    Aw, come on, if the legion of kids who're killed by frying pans

    Funny story…
    :belt_onion:
    When I was young my cousin and I were out playing in the neighborhood at my grandma's house, and this other kid who I didn't know came up to us holding a frying pan and telling us to get down and kiss the ground, with out motivation supposedly being the threat of a bashing with said pan. My cousin, the younger of the two of us, did so more-or-less immediately. But I, not exactly a small child, decided to take a different option and quickly wrested the frying pan out of the other kid's hands. Said kid immediately proceeded to run home, while we went back to our grandparents' house (leaving the frying pan at the mail boxes) where our grandmother kept us inside because she was afraid of retribution. The other kid, you see, was black, and my grandparents (particularly my grandmother) were under the impression the neighborhood was slowly being infested with druggies and gangs. It turned out, however, that the white guy a few doors down eventually discovered to have been abusing his step-kids was a much more significant problem. Which is not to say he wasn't a concern either, but I don't think the extent of the problem with him was obvious until after the police gave him a ride.
    /:belt_onion:

    @aliceif said:

    👍 🚢 @pjh

    Why are you trying to ship @PJH off somewhere? I thought we kinda wanted him around.


  • BINNED

    @Dreikin said:

    Well, we don't have any cookies, but, um, we have trains?

    If they are better than the ones I ride every day...


  • Discourse touched me in a no-no place

    @Dreikin said:

    Why are you trying to ship @PJH off somewhere? I thought we kinda wanted him around.

    Maybe @aliceif is trying to ship him back from the pub.

    @aliceif said:

    I thought @xaade tried to be funny and meant that women having intercourse with idiots leads to dumb children.

    I thought that, then no-one else seemed to, and I thought that I saw a joke where there wasn't one.


  • BINNED

    Whoosh badges for everyone else!



  • Look again. She is clearly shipping him with his (well, somebody's) left hand.


  • ♿ (Parody)

    @loopback0 said:

    I thought that, then no-one else seemed to, and I thought that I saw a joke where there wasn't one.

    I saw it (and commented on it!).



  • We used to have a :shipit: emoji, but it disappeared.


  • BINNED

    @loopback0 said:

    @Dreikin said:
    Why are you trying to ship @PJH off somewhere? I thought we kinda wanted him around.

    Maybe @aliceif is trying to ship him back from the pub.


    You would have more chance at making a bug free Discourse update


  • kills Dumbledore

    @ben_lubar said:

    Did anyone actually read the link?

    No. Because it was about Go


  • BINNED

    @Onyx said:

    Wasn't there a famous quote about "feminism being the radical notion that women are human beings"? Hey, guess what? I AGREE! Hot diggidy, indeed they are! Hey, here's a wild idea: let's stop splitting the demographics and fix shit? Is there a problem? Ok, let's see what we can do! I don't care if you have a dick, or tits, or both. You're a person and I care about you because of that!

    +∞

    @boomzilla said:

    Could you please define "social justice" for us, then? It's a very ambiguous and abused term.

    WONTFIX_ASDESIGNED



  • if (overflow_usub(mtu, hlen + sizeof(struct frag_hdr), &mtu) ||
    mtu <= 7)
    goto fail_toobig;

    if (mtu < hlen + sizeof(struct frag_hdr) + 8)
    goto fail_toobig;
    mtu -= hlen + sizeof(struct frag_hdr);

    1. Both have magic numbers. One uses < 8, the other <=7.
      Why do we want an extra 8 room to be sure we can decrement by a number that doesn't include the 8?
      That question is rhetorical. It doesn't matter why. The fact that I can't look at the code and tell why is the problem.

    2. They both use goto.

    3. Names.... fucking hell names. What the hell is hlen. Is that.... header length.... no because we're also including the size of a struct that's named frag_hdr. Fragment header?

    And this guy is complaining about which one is legible.

    At least the original has some slight self documentation with the method's name being called.



  • @accalia said:

    what exactly is the point and/or joke you are attemptng to make?
    Probably something to do with the rafsi (analogous to roots when compounding lobjan words). He's actually going to have to say "x1 reacts to x3 by protecting x2 from the danger x1 perceives x3 represents" before he can expect understanding though, and laughter or even half-hearted smiling is just completely inaccessible at this point.



  • @Pharylon said:

    I agree with the "grandma," thing, actually.

    If I'd been here sooner I could have saved you some effort: The prevailing opinions on this forum are way, way against you, and nobody is interested in being convinced they're wrong, because they're obviously right, otherwise they wouldn't think what they think.


  • ♿ (Parody)

    @another_sam said:

    The prevailing opinions on this forum are way, way against you, and nobody is interested in being convinced they're wrong, because they're obviously right, otherwise they wouldn't think what they think.

    I'm interested in hearing his arguments. I even asked some questions that didn't get answered. The grandma thing is stupid, because the cliche there is about people who grew up without some particular technology and are either too old to learn or have decided they don't want to learn. But SJW types have decided it's a slight on women, because that's what they look for.

    Why not grandpa? Well, they tend to die a lot younger, so there are more old grandmas.



  • @Fox said:

    Women, for example, have a lot more issues with reproductive health than men, simply because they are the ones who carry babies.

    How fucking assholish of you to disregard the reproductive health issues of men who have women's bodies, and lump women who have women's bodies in with the women who don't and will never have the same reproductive health issues that women with women's bodies have.

    I could see such an ignorant statement coming from someone like @boomzilla or @Polygeekery, but from you!?


  • Java Dev

    :wtf:



  • @Fox is normally a big advocate of better rights and recognition for women with men's bodies and vice versa.


  • Winner of the 2016 Presidential Election Banned

    People are fond of straw man arguments in this forum.



  • It's easier than actual thinking.



  • @boomzilla said:

    I'm interested in hearing his arguments

    So you say, but you've never demonstrated any interest before, quite the opposite.

    @boomzilla said:

    The grandma thing is stupid

    You don't even see it when it's clearly pointed out to you.

    @boomzilla said:

    SJW types have decided it's a slight on women

    and old people. Because it is.

    @boomzilla said:

    Why not grandpa

    Because that's not funny and grandma is, because dear old grams just don't get it.

    @boomzilla said:

    they tend to die a lot younger, so there are more old grandmas

    This is a bullshit excuse and you know it. You sound like my seven-year-old making terrible excuses for poor behaviour.


  • Dupa

    @Pharylon said:

    if someone uses the word "cis" to describe a straight person

    It's really a thing? I mean, I saw this in one of this season's South Park episodes, but I thought it was Parker and Stone trolling...

    @Pharylon said:

    social justice is bad

    But what is social justice? I might be missing a lot from the trans thread, because I don't read it totally on purpose, but that just looks like a PC mumbo-jumbo, that sounds great but doesn't really mean anything.

    @another_sam said:

    You sound like my seven-year-old

    But would it be ok to say that a seven-year-old could do it? Or a four-year-old? Or a two-year-old? Or would that be demeaning to little- sweet Jesus- children?

    I'm honestly interested. Because from what you say, you can't really use any kind of comparison. Maybe apart from "a fucking stupid shithead could do it".

    BTW, I really kinda like Discourse's'sss reply box, but it fucking doesn't work on iP5-sized screens (4"?). I get it, visionary: "LARGE POHNSE ARE HTE WAY OF TEH FUTURESSS!!!"



  • @boomzilla said:

    Why not grandpa? Well, they tend to die a lot younger, so there are more old grandmas.

    I was born with 1 living grandma and 2 living grandpas. The grandma died and then one of the grandpas died. Citation needed.



  • @kt_ said:

    It's really a thing?

    No, @Pharylon is a phony.


  • Dupa

    But is he a phonephony, or a cis-phony? 🚎


  • Dupa

    @ben_lubar said:

    I was born with 1 living grandma and 2 living grandpas. The grandma died and then one of the grandpas died.

    Yeah, I know what you're talking about. They say I was born during a baby bust (is that a correct term?), but then in my class in elementary school were so many children, that I really don't believe 'em. They probably just want my monies.



  • You mean, if he was a phony at birth?

    Who knows, and I don't care.


  • Dupa

    @aliceif said:

    You mean, if he was a phony at birth?

    I'm not sure, these are uncharted waters for me, but I think I mean, if his gender identity aligns with his assigned phoniness?

    @aliceif said:

    I don't care.

    Good for you! 👏


  • 🚽 Regular

    :<parp>clap: ?

    It looks like a squid diving with a tiny submarine in the distance.


  • Dupa

    @Cursorkeys said:

    👏 ?

    It looks like a squid diving with a tiny submarine in the distance.

    Yup, it's a funny little emoji, but very deep, that works on so many levels and keeps challenging our assumptions, paving our way to the better world.


  • ♿ (Parody)

    @another_sam said:

    So you say, but you've never demonstrated any interest before, quite the opposite.

    Yes, that's clearly why I asked him about his opinion. I ask many people about their opinions.

    @another_sam said:

    You don't even see it when it's clearly pointed out to you.

    Ah, yes, I disagree so I'm not even paying attention or something.

    @another_sam said:

    This is a bullshit excuse and you know it.

    And you know what I'm thinking better than I do! Speaking of people who aren't interested in anyone else's opinion. I'd say we can agree to disagree, but from this close minded post of yours, I don't think you'd believe me.


  • ♿ (Parody)

    @ben_lubar said:

    @boomzilla said:
    Why not grandpa? Well, they tend to die a lot younger, so there are more old grandmas.

    I was born with 1 living grandma and 2 living grandpas. The grandma died and then one of the grandpas died. Citation needed.

    Like, you're asking me for their death certificates or something? I'm not sure what's going on here.


  • Discourse touched me in a no-no place

    @boomzilla said:

    I'm not sure what's going on here.

    I think one of his grandpas killed the rest of his grandparents.


  • ♿ (Parody)

    Probably over a minced kale roast or something.


  • BINNED

    @kt_ said:

    But what is social justice? I might be missing a lot from the trans thread, because I don't read it totally on purpose, but that just looks like a PC mumbo-jumbo, that sounds great but doesn't really mean anything..

    WONTFIX_ASDESIGNED





  • @kt_ said:

    But would it be ok to say that a seven-year-old could do it?

    Which seven-year-old?

    @kt_ said:

    little- sweet Jesus- children?

    There's no such thing. All children are devil children.

    @kt_ said:

    you can't really use any kind of comparison

    I don't understand why a comparison is needed. "Go's type system is simple" works just fine without marginalising Grandma. The comparison should be to something relevant, perhaps "Go's type system is simple compared to Javascript".



  • Go's type system is so simple an entity that is capable of using simple type systems could use it.



  • @boomzilla said:

    minced kale roast


  • kills Dumbledore

    @another_sam said:

    marginalising Grandma

    The reason that "Simple enough for Grandma" is a cliché is because it's very often true. Older people who didn't grow up with computers and have less brain plasticity than when they were younger find it hard to pick up computing concepts. This is a fact, and is not a nasty thing to point out. When you go overly politically correct you give the anti "SJW" idiots more ammo.



  • Unless we're talking about programming languages being simple enough for Grandma?


Log in to reply