Share your viruses on Facebook!
-
Are typos mandatory or optional?
-
Because they're mutually exclusive. Even if you can't interpret regular words in regular sentence in a mathematical way, you still have to follow the laws of logic.
-
Rabies doesn't exist in the UK, though!
-
@anonymous234 said:
Plot twist: it actually uploads your infected files on Facebook and sends links to your friends.
You've confused this with Anakin Filewalker.
http://www8.pcmag.com/media/images/223282-avira-antivir-personal-10-luke-filewalker.jpg?width=630
-
Isn't he 24?
-
-
You're not going to subject us to lojban are you?
-
@accalia said:
Have you ever experiences a fox bite first hand?
I wear chainmail gloves for a reason.
No one said the bite would be on your hand.
-
-
Under normal circumstances no, I have not bitten a fox.
Would you, could you, in a box?
-
Would you, could you, in a box?
I would not, should not, in a Box!
I would not, could not, with a Fox!I don't do , @boomzilla,
I wait in abstinence forever!Edit: INB4 the conclusion where I become the most promiscuous drone on the internet...
Filed under: Forever alone on the internet
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
No one said the bite would be on your hand.
Saying I wear chainmail gloves doesn't mean I'm not armored elsewhere. If I were in a zombie movie I'd be wearing at a minimum jeans and a long-sleeve jean jacket.
-
Saying I wear chainmail gloves doesn't mean I'm not armored elsewhere. If I were in a zombie movie I'd be wearing at a minimum jeans and a long-sleeve jean jacket.
Really, that's it? I'd be going straight for the riot gear from the nearest abandoned police station.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
Really, that's it?
I did say "at a minimum." Like maybe someone beat me to the riot gear, or I haven't found a crowbar big enough to break open the locks, or I haven't gotten there yet. There's no point in running around in a damn t-shirt and shorts until such time, though.
Shit, human teeth aren't that sharp. It occurred to me once that you could probably make scale mail by cutting up plastic bottles and using fishing line or something to "sew" 'em together. Not something you'd want to use for years, but might keep you alive until you can upgrade. Kind of like how in World War Z, Brad Pitt taped magazines to his forearms. That was inspired, and yet in Season 6 of The Walking Dead, people still walk around wearing the equivalent of "BUFFET HERE!" sandwich boards.
-
Being bitten by a disease-ridden pest? No, I'd imagine not.
Hey! I haven't bitten anyone!
Not recently, anyway...
-
Shit, human teeth aren't that sharp. -- yet in Season 6 of The Walking Dead
Now, in all fairness, in TWD universe, I think human bones are made out of jelly or cartilage or something. Because no one has any problem stabbing someone through the skull with just any old thing. Maybe it's a game play balance thing:
BETA 0.1: Human teeth aren't sharp enough to penetrate skin, zombies can't reproduce
BETA 0.56a: Zombies reproducing too rapidly, humans need balancing, added "One shot to head" kills
BETA 0.88cc: Human and zombie skulls too thick to pierce hand-to-hand. Humans underpowered hand to hand. Lowering bone density to allow hand-to-hand headshotsSo the zombie apocalypse was actually caused by osteoporosis.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
Now, in all fairness, in TWD universe, I think human bones are made out of jelly or cartilage or something. Because no one has any problem stabbing someone through the skull with just any old thing. Maybe it's a game play balance thing:
The skull is fairly thin, and if they're not using something that's not at least the size of a Bowie knife or something, they do tend to aim for the eye socket.
But one guy got bit in the most recent episode through what looked like fairly beefy pants. That struck me as unlikely.
I'm just sayin'. After two-plus years, people who go outside without wearing a motorcycle helmet and, cripes, at least a towel or something over the neck to protect it, maybe they don't deserve to live.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
added "One shot to head" kills
The idea that a headshot is an instant drop seems a little odd, but it probably simplifies plot lines quite a bit.
-
maybe they don't deserve to live.
TWD people are some dumb motherfuckers. Given the population drop, they may literally be the stupidest people on the planet.
-
maybe they don't deserve to live.
TWD people are some dumb motherfuckers. Given the population drop, they may literally be the stupidest people on the planet.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
TWD people are some dumb motherfuckers. Given the population drop, they may literally be the stupidest people on the planet.
Almost all people in zombie movies are, though. How is it almost nobody in the genre ever says "holy shit, people are biting other people! Maybe I better do something to make it harder for that to happen to me." That's why I called out WWZ above: that was one (of the few) thing(s) that movie did right.
-
Because they're mutually exclusive. Even if you can't interpret regular words in regular sentence in a mathematical way, you still have to follow the laws of logic.
No. There's a third option. If it is mandatory or optional, then that means they can not be prohibited.
-
Are they prohibited?
-
If they aren't mandatory, then they are prohibited.
Conversely, if they aren't prohibited, they are mandatory.
-
I'd like to introduce you to the intuitionistic logic.
-
Big Brother says "Whoosh!"
Wait, hmmn, maybe I am wrong, was that actually in 1984 or not? I think it was actually 'forbidden' rather than 'prohbited', though.
Filed Under: Some whooshes are more equal than others
-
I think it's neither, because first Google result for this phrase is your post.
-
I wasn't giving the exact quote, actually, but it turns out I had the source wrong; the line "Everything which is not forbidden is compulsory" is from The Once and Future King, not 1984. Feh, I are da skrewupz.
-
No matter how you look at it, I was right it's neither.
-
I will grant you this.
-
Wait a minute, I thought that Tinder was the one where people shared viruses...
Filed Under: Open sores development
-
-
-
Because they're mutually exclusive.
While that might be true on a per-word basis, it's entirely possible for a sentence to contain some of both.
-
Yeah, I guess you're right. Pendantic dickwed.
-
As the tag line says: Better living through pedantry
-
While that might be true on a per-word basis, it's entirely possible for a sentence to contain some of both.
Also, it's a damn poor language that can't let words fulfull multiple parts of speech in different parts of the same sentence: if your language can't express "fuck the fucking fuckers!" you need to find a better one.
-
I think you meant to reply in the other flamewar.
-
I think you meant to reply in the other flamewar.
Weren't we language-bashing in this one? If not, can't a man try to start up a new flamewar from time to time?
-
Not if you're wrong in the very first post - in the phrase "fuck the fucking fuckers", no word occurs more than once.
-
Not if you're wrong in the very first post - in the phrase "fuck the fucking fuckers", no word occurs more than once.
Oooh, pendantry! Fine, the same root word.
-
Fine, the same root word.
And now you're ranting about the elements of null set. Because there is not even a single human language in the whole world, past, present or future, that doesn't have inflection of some kind.
-
if your language can't express "fuck the fucking fuckers" in at least three different ways without repeating a root word, you need to find a better one.
FTFY.