The Fallen of World War II
-
It's actually not trivial.
Right click image, Copy image URL.
Click reply, click Quote whole post.
Paste in copied URL - notice they're the same.So ummm... yeah, it is.
Plus, I couldn't confirm what Quote Full Post was trying to do for that post, because I was not as lucky as you or Chaos; I can definitely reproduce the issue, and I stopped waiting for the quote to show up after staring at the window for three minutes with no change.
Oh, yeah, that happens not because it's uploading the image again but because it's a steaming pile of donkey turds.
-
Right click image, Copy image URL.
Click reply, click Quote whole post.
Paste in copied URL - notice they're the same.wait three minutes and then say "Fuck it" and cancel the process
FTFY
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
i get as result 1 as the Garfield minus Garfield strip that matches.
Hrm, I get that too if I visit the link that shows as #1. But if I switch to image search on both, I get the actual strip which is linked from the same site that gave #1 on the web search.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
Hey, extra fun. Clicking the "Quote entire post" button won't quote your post, because it's 100% an image?
FF sometimes has problems with discoimages.
-
-
@blakeyrat said:
What are you trying to imply?
You're late to the party. I was already corrected to death on this point.
Doesn't feel good, does it?
-
Apparently you have to get special permission and it's a PITA
Is that why most WWII films are about America single-handedly winning the war?
-
Is that why most WWII films are about America single-handedly winning the war?
Nah, that's just because they're American films for American audiences.
-
@Gaska said:
because there are laws against denial of Holocaust in about every
civilizedshithole European socialist country (especiallyunlike the freedom-loving USA).FTFY.
14 European nations out of 50 is hardly 'about every'..
-
11 out of 15 biggest EU countries have those - and I'm pretty sure the remaining four, maybe with exception of UK, would quickly set up such laws if need arises. That, or would pursue Holocaust denier with some other paragraph.
-
11 out of 15 biggest EU countries have those - and I'm pretty sure the remaining four, maybe with exception of UK, would quickly set up such laws if need arises.
Nevertheless:
The European Union's executive Commission proposed a European Union-wide anti-racism xenophobia law in 2001, which included the criminalization of Holocaust denial. On July 15, 1996, the Council of the European Union adopted the Joint action/96/443/JHA concerning action to combat racism and xenophobia.[55][56] During the German presidency there was an attempt to extend this ban.[57] Full implementation was blocked by the United Kingdom and the Nordic countries because of the need to balance the restrictions on voicing racist opinions against the freedom of expression.
-
In fairness you don't really need laws prohibiting denying the holocaust when you have people more than happy to police each other.
e.g. I'm happy to let you spew your racist garbage but you have to be prepared for social exile and stern looks.
-
I said, about every shithole European socialist country. That pretty much implies EU. If anything, it's you by including anything but EU countries.blocked by the United Kingdom and the Nordic countries
It was fifteen years ago, before Sweden decided it's okay to have Muslim enclaves and UK court ruled it's OK for Muslims to beat their wives.
-
I've once read a blog post where someone has described how he tried to verify the Holocaust death count.
I once read a blog post where someone explained how the British Royal Family is actually a pack of shape-shifting lizards. It's a big Web.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
Jesus fucking shit, you pyschos! Do you even realize that you're saying, word for word, beat for beat, EXACTLY THE RHETORIC THAT HITLER USED TO RALLY SUPPORT, GET INTO POWER, FOR THE THIRD REICH AND CAUSE THE HOLOCAUST?
I've destroyed at least one friendship by making exactly that point. Pity. I respected her until then.
-
Is that why most WWII films are about America single-handedly winning the war?
What the fuck does that have to do with anything ever?
-
Nothing, I just knew it would set you off.
-
Congratulations, you got me to type a single sentence asking for clarification. You win all the Internets, I guess.
-
Congratulations, you got me to type a single sentence asking for clarification. You win all the Internets, I guess.
Clarification: you now typed two sentences.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
@blakeyrat said:
Congratulations, you got me to type a single sentence asking for clarification. You win all the Internets, I guess.
Clarification: you now typed two sentences.
Actually that's three. One for each World War America will have won soon enough!
-
[out of 50][1]
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe50?? Really? That many?
OK... that's a challenge... I got... 42 correct out of 49 I could list.Knowing I was shooting for 50....
- I made "Sovereignty Errors" on 6 – e.g. counting the UK as 4 countries instead of 1.
- Included 1 that I knew full well isn't recognized by anyone
- Omitted 4, including one where I just couldn't remember the name.
- Didn't include 4 because I wasn't including the Eastern Black Sea nations – and might have had trouble with them anyway.
All and all not too terrible I would say...
[spoiler]
Sovereignty Errors: UK nations, Crete, Greenland, Sardinia – remember I was stretching for 50!
ORLY? Error: Transnistria
E.Black Sea: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakshstan
Errors: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Luxembourg, Moldova, San Marino
[/spoiler]