Ashley Madison: Crypto Edition
-
I thought the other part of that article was also interesting - the fact that various different, supposedly targeted dating sites in actuality all share the same back-end database, so that signing up for a dating site branded as being for single parents also automatically puts you on a bunch of other sites - and conversely the single parents site also has everyone on it who signed up for any of the other sites.
-
I keep checking the articles here in the vein hope to read one other article as y as that story, but nope it has been disappointing. That was a good simple, clear and juicy.
-
Those on Ashley Madison are bots.
-
Let's be fair, that is one of the best stories ever to come out here. That sort of quality only turns up every few years (so yes, you have to go back to the archives of the old site to find anything as awesome: @drurowin's story about “facilities management” is the previous one on that level that I can think of).
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
Web development. The most evil kind of development.
One like is not enough.
Filed under: Fuck browsers. All of them.
-
-
Didn't know you where into orgies.
It's more of a gangbang.
Incidentally, they love it when you talk dirty.
Filed under:
display: table-cell
,align:left !important;
.
-
@Luhmann said:
Didn't know you where into orgies.
Filed under:
display: table-cell
,align:left !important;
.
I almost cried reading that that... I spent most of the morning learning that all I needed was !important
-
I keep checking the articles here in the
veinvain hope to read one other article as y as that story, but nope it has been disappointing. That was a good simple, clear and juicy.FTFY
Unless you have some way of mining hope or extracting it from your circulatory system, vein is the incorrect term in this case. Even then, "in the vein hope to" doesn't quite parse. Come on, what in the name of belgium[1] does "in the [blood vessel] hope to" or "in the [deposit of] hope to" mean? Neither one makes sense.
No, you want to use "vain". Not the definition that means "egotistical, having a high opinion of one's self", but rather the definition that means "useless, producing no result".
[1] I'm beginning to think that Jeff may be a more offensive word than Belgium. I'm thinking of throwing my support behind the petition to add that term to the censored words list.
Filed Under: Homophones, how do they work?
Also Filed Under: This post was probably a vain attempt to get a spellar badge.
Also Also Filed Under: That last filed under has two meanings!
-
It's more of a gangbang.
That would be if all the browsers were fucking you.
Filed under: In other words, EXACTLY like being a web developer.
-
-
Also Filed Under: This post was probably a vain attempt to get a spellar badge.
Correct usage of words is obsolete as any fule kno.
Filed under: Molesworth
-
I'm beginning to think that Jeff may be a more offensive word than ■■■■■■■. I'm thinking of throwing my support behind the petition to add that term to the censored words list.
I just manually censor it. The lazy way! Type Belgium and then copy/paste 4 of those from the preview back to the compose window :)
-
@drurowin's story about “facilities management” is the previous one on that level that I can think of).
Yeah, but that was fake.
-
It was a well-done fake, though.