Firefox Nightly: "you know that new and buggy feature you disabled?...
-
Amusingly (?), in WoD, once you build a garrison, there's an outhouse. If you click on it, you get put inside it, sitting, and earn an achievement, Staying Regular.
-
Which reminds me of the old joke of there only being one outhouse, which was occupied
-
I was talking gold coins, so whatever his ammo is that costs twenty thousand Krugerrands, he isn't going to fire much of it, unless that's a bulk price ("I was talking about the entire US annual production of .22LR, which is why nobody can find any!")
Here, have some ammo.
-
What bothers me the most is that they messed up the color theme for the tabs on Linux: there's almost no color difference between the active tab and the background ones!
-
Dicsource feature request: onebox for http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/
Done.
-
And it doesn't stack, taking up an extra bag slot instead.
-
Riiiiiise topiic. From the deaaad, riiiise.
So, with "Pocket", Firefox has now raised to 5 the count of features that came out of nowhere and that I immediately hid.
INB4 "TRWTF is still using Firefox".
-
Pocket is great, but including support for it as a core part of the browser is . It's like making word belgiuming a core part of forum software.
-
It's like making word belgiuming a core part of forum software.
I approve. What say you, @Luhmann?
-
features that came out of nowhere and that I immediately hid.
Did you also set loop.enabled = false in about:config to make sure that Hello is actually turned off altogether? I am a bit creeped out by the idea of having my web browser talk to my camera by default.
-
It does that WITHOUT asking for permission? o.O
-
Who TF knows what it does? I'm just happy they gave me a pref to turn the shit off. Didn't ask for it, don't want it.
-
TIL. Thank you.
-
I approve. What say you, @Luhmann?
Stamped with the Belgium seal of approval!
And in contrast to other seal of approval images this one doesn't include asubliminal image of a women
-
And in contrast to other seal of approval images this one doesn't include asubliminal image of a women
I don't see a penis on that lion though...
-
(old post, I know, but still relevant)
Type console.pro in the web console. You get an autocomplete prompt with three options.Navigate the options using the arrow keys. Once you're satisfied with the option you want, press Enter. The text is completed in the prompt. Everything is fine.
Now type console.pro in the web console. This time, don't navigate with the arrow keys. Just press Enter. The text is not completed. Instead, the incomplete command is accepted as console.pro and you get back undefined.
Autocomplete discrepancies drive me mad. Sometimes you have to press tab. Sometimes you have to press enter. Sometimes you have to press space. Sometimes it's even the right arrow.
Whichever it is, I somehow always get it wrong the first time.
-
Let's not forget Chrome was the one who pioneered adding extra stupid features to the browser. Most notably "apps".
Pocket is great, but including support for it as a core part of the browser is . It's like making word ■■■■■■■ing a core part of forum software.
Well, the "reading view" can be useful. Safari has the exact same thing IIRC, you can save pages to read them later.
-
-
Type console.pro in the web console. You get an autocomplete prompt with three options.Navigate the options using the arrow keys. Once you're satisfied with the option you want, press Enter. The text is completed in the prompt. Everything is fine.
I know this was posted a while back, but anon quoted it so I saw it.Now type console.pro in the web console. This time, don't navigate with the arrow keys. Just press Enter. The text is not completed. Instead, the incomplete command is accepted as console.pro and you get back undefined.
Firefoxcistency!
And... how you describe it is very close to how I expect autocomplete to work! Obviously not all do, but there's a really good reason for it to work that way. Using the arrow keys to navigate is an affirmative indication that you actually want to select something from autocomplete, so it makes sense that future actions (pressing enter) use your selection. But if you don't take an affirmative action, then it should behave as if autocomplete wasn't there. Otherwise you get weird things where I can say "type
foo
in the console and press enter" and have it do different things depending on what autocomplete options are available. To me, that is code-completion inconsistency, not doing different things depending on if you select something or not.Now, all that said, FF's UI for autocomplete is poor when matched with its behavior: it displays both the first completion in the box as well as show the corresponding item in the list highlighted, using the same style as if you actually select it. But again, to me that is the problem, not the actual behavior.
-
#FoxNo, #FoxOff, #FoxThatShit
(with apologies to @accalia)
-
Did you also set loop.enabled = false in about:config to make sure that Hello is actually turned off altogether?
As a matter of fact I did.You could say... I'm out of the loop.
-
-
@OffByOne said:
I don't see a penis on that lion though...
well you wouldn't, not on a lioness
So you mean that when @Luhmann said
@Luhmann said:this [image] doesn't include asubliminal image of a women
the "not" was referring to the "subliminal" instead of "woman"?
-
-
@OffByOne said:
I don't see a penis on that lion though...
I don't see boobs on it either
:justine_henin.jpg:
-
-
@Luhmann said:
@OffByOne said:
:justine_henin.jpg:I don't see a penis on that lion though...
I don't see boobs on it either
:buck_angel.mp4:
-
-
http://www.vancouversun.com/entertainment/cms/binary/9899814.jpg?size=620x400s
Awwww!
@dkf said:https://bayareadogtrainer.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/img_3032.jpg
…yeah, that's not as cute
-
-
@dkf said:
That looks painful.
Is that piano's right pedal broken?
I bet the conductor's glad he only brought his shitty bamboo baton
-
-
Ok, so Firefox introduced one nice feature:
Tried it in a couple of sites and it seems to be doing a decent job of extracting a page's actual content from all the navigational, ad and comment bits.
Filed under: FUCKING HELL WHY ISN'T THE MOUSE CURSOR CAPTURED??
-
Note: Doesn't work on Discourse. You get the first post in a hunk. That's it.
-
Of course. Everything else is in the cloud, and you can't read a cloud.
-
-
Ok, so Firefox introduced one nice feature:
"Introduced" being a euphemism for "stole from Internet Explorer".
-
Don't be silly. Didn't you know Internet Explorer is identical to how it was in version 6?
-
"Introduced" being a euphemism for "stole from Internet Explorer".
Silly. It's totally useless in IE, as opposed to Firefox, where it's utterly pointless.
Filed under: ever wondered how your site looks when the css fails to load? now you know!
-
That's PAVuControl.
I thought that read "Pavlov Control" and thought: "gee, that explains a lot. Wait, What?"