Why are cats immune to chemtrails?
-
-
Is there a "clinically insane ideas" thropic yet?
-
-
Nice consistency on href styling.
-
That's @PJH's fault. The default styles are consistent, but @PJH added underlines to cooked posts (that is, not the editor).
-
Nice.
-
#topic-progress { width: 170px } #topic-progress-expanded { width: 158px } #topic-progress-expanded .jump-form input[type="text"] { width: 85px } .cooked a { text-decoration: underline } .cooked a.mention { text-decoration: none } a:not([href]),a[href="#tag"] { text-decoration: none } pre code { max-height: initial } kbd * * { display: inline-block } div.cooked * * * * * * * * * * { display: none } .discourse-no-touch .post-cloak .gutter .reply-new { opacity: 0.5 } .post-cloak:hover .gutter .reply-new,.post-cloak:hover .gutter .track-link { opacity: 1 } .gutter .reply-new,.gutter .track-link { display: inline } .d-header #site-logo { max-width: 280px !important } details summary { cursor: pointer } .page-not-found-topics { display: none } .category-logo { max-height: 64px } span.user-badge[data-badge-name="Someone didn't get the joke"] i::before { color: #DE5D83 } span.user-badge[data-badge-name="@codinghorror"] i::before { color: #A4C739 } span.user-badge[data-badge-name="@nagesh"] i::before { color: #A4C739 } span.user-badge[data-badge-name="I'm a special snowflake"] i::before { color: #ACACAC } span.user-badge[data-badge-name="Worst of the Worst"] i::before { color: #CC33FF } span.user-badge[data-badge-name="INB4 fail"] i::before { color: #A3C00F } span.user-badge[data-badge-name="Touched In The Head By An Angel"] i::before { color: #e00a97 } nav.post-controls button.has-like { color: #FF0000 } nav.post-controls button.like:hover { color: #FF0000; background: #FF8080 } .discourse-no-touch .post-cloak div.actions,.discourse-no-touch .post-cloak .post-actions { opacity: 1 } .fa-trophy:before,.fa-magic:before { background-color: #FFF; border: 1px solid #E9E9E9; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0px 1px 0px rgba(34,34,34,0.898); color: #222; display: inline-block; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.4; margin: 0px 0.1em; padding: 0.1em 0.6em }
-
I tried reading that, but my brain started melting 3 sentences in.
Am I still allowed to laugh at it?
-
I had to comment. I've been trying to tell people about cat chemtrail immunity for years. It's to fight the illuminati.
-
OK, I'm still not sure if it's a parody website or not. But I did find this: http://harddawn.com/is-your-cat-wasting-her-life-away-with-useless-hobbies/
-
+1: That website is awesome! I love the smack in your face idiocy of it (in very small doses). Parody or not.
-
-
Vaccines give cats autism, right?
-
Well duh, chemtrails are in the air and cats are on the ground!
-
Well duh, chemtrails are in the air and cats are on the ground!
+1
You're lucky I was out of coffee, otherwise I'd have to send you the cleaning bill.
-
-
Their purpose may be to depopulate the skies so that pigeons can reign
http://i.imgur.com/hOtLfoq.png
Filed under: all hail our new pigeon overlords
-
-
-
Especially where concerning this they're not a laughing matter.
-
Their purpose may be to depopulate the skies so that pigeons can reign
Filed under: all hail our new pigeon overlords
State of California is on it:
-
Wildlife officials say they've counted one bird being scorched to death every two minutes.
I imagine them sitting down with binoculars and a stopwatch and making tally marks.
-
I assume they just go out and sweep up the carcasses for lunch.
-
I assume they just go out and sweep up the carcasses for lunch.
Are there dove or pheasant in the area? That might not be half bad. You have to cook the little bastards pretty quickly to keep them from drying out. I imagine some kind of solar array that can kill a flying bird would quality as "quickly".
A little salt and pepper and you have yourself a tasty lunch, after it stops smoldering.
-
Don't tell @faoileag
-
State of California is on it:
Meh. I'm waiting for an orbital laser cannon to be developed for that purpose.
You never know when it might come in handy...
Filed under: and for that sole purpose explicitly
-
www.usatoday.com
Why birds are igniting in midair over Calif.
...one bird being scorched to death every two minutes.
scorch != ignite
-
-
scorch != ignite
Doesn't meant they aren't both happening. The feathers might ignite and burn quickly, but not enough to really finish off the birds.
Filed Under: still probably just bad writing
-
Doesn't meant they aren't both happening.
Possibly, but ignition is not mentioned anywhere except the sensational headline.
still probably just bad writing
This.
Filed under: Pedantic dickweedery requires that I point out the discrepancy between the headline and the article.
-
Filed under: Pedantic dickweedery requires that I point out the misleading nature of the headline.
And yet you mised my typo:
Doesn't meant
-
Now he must turn the gun on himself.
-
-
-
That's deuce, or juice if you can't say it right.
-
And yet you missed my typo:
I saw it, but I'm a pedantic dickweed, not a spellar/gramming Nazi. Usually. And I see your (presumably intentional) typo in this post, too. You can do better than that.
-
-
-
I think it did allright.
I'm not you're B*****ming proofreader. This has become tyresome.
-
Filed under: Pedantic dickweedery requires that I point out the discrepancy between the headline and the article.
Given the state of modern journalism, it would be easiest to assume the headline and the article are not correlated in any way and instead use your effort to point out articles where they actually agree.
-
Let's all just enjoy the fact that two of the most popular forms (broadly defined) of Green Energy are out to get the birds.
-
Given the state of modern journalism, it would be easiest to assume the headline and the article are not correlated in any way
Paragraph 19 . I've mentioned it here before.
-
Paragraph 19 . I've mentioned it here before.
Right, but I thought @mott555's point was that some editor, who may never even talk to the writer, comes up with the headline.
-
That seems to be quite common, yes.
-
That's got to be the strangest article I've ever read... these people are so far behind the edge... it's just wow!
While this idea may sound far-fetched, it does explain cats’ wistful attitude towards Chemtrail planes.
No it's because they're a fucking cat, who aren't well known for their understanding of aviation or chemistry (much like the articles author).
The bit where they go - some people think cats are aliens, so they must be immune to chemtrails - had me on the floor.
-
Goddamned.
-
That's got to be the strangest article I've ever read... these people are so far behind the edge... it's just wow!
You're just too close minded to grasp what's really going on.
-
Completely blind it seems - some of the other gems from the "science" section on that site:
Are Travolta’s Gay Rumors Just a Cover-Up for His Role in the Chemtrails Conspiracy?
Are Deep-Sea Dinosaurs Living Proof of the Biblical Timeline?
AQUATRAILS: Harmless Backsplash or Deadly Chemtrails of the Sea?
Monsanto, Now Breeding Cows With HolesThat last one made me LOL so much I looked it up, apparently they're cannulated cows, a surgical process that allows access to the rumen for research purposes - a process that was developed in the 1920s
-
Which was done on a human, in the 1820s.
-
some editor, who
FTFYmaynever eventalk to the writerread the article, comes up with the headline.