In just 2 days, you guys have Jeff Attwood has completely ruined Jeff Atwood for me.
I read his blog post today and it read like a guy just whining about nonsense.
*welcomes the enlightenment of wtdwtf *
In just 2 days, you guys have Jeff Attwood has completely ruined Jeff Atwood for me.
I read his blog post today and it read like a guy just whining about nonsense.
*welcomes the enlightenment of wtdwtf *
I wondered why the site crashed a little bit ago....
Things are getting serious in here...
(to lighten the mood :) )
@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
What is this "Red Dwarf"?
*googles
Oh shit, there goes my weekend.
Thanks guys!
@tufty said:@tufty said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@HardwareGeek said:@PleegWat said:@uncreative said:@Magus said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@Magus said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!
How have we not broken this thing yet?
@tufty said:@HardwareGeek said:@PleegWat said:@uncreative said:@Magus said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@Magus said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@Magus said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
@uncreative said:@Magus said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@Magus said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
I thought that was the point of discourse! Maintaining "Civilized Discourse" For the future of humanity!
@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@PleegWat said:@uncreative said:@Magus said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@Magus said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
I thought that was the point of discourse! Maintaining "Civilized Discourse" For the future of humanity!
Wouldn't Jeff like to think so...
At some point we're going to hit the CSS nesting depth.
No, he jus thinks trolling is only acceptable by him
@uncreative said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@CreatedToDislikeThis said:@HardwareGeek said:@uncreative said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!How have we not broken this thing yet?
Just give it a while.
Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.
It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo
Probably needs jeffing, though.
Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...
Yeah, good luck with that.
What's even worse is since makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...
Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...
This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse
's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.ftfy
Well, yes, that too.
I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.
It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)
TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...
@rc4 said:@CreatedToDislikeThis said:@HardwareGeek said:@uncreative said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!How have we not broken this thing yet?
Just give it a while.
Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.
It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo
Probably needs jeffing, though.
Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...
Yeah, good luck with that.
What's even worse is since makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...
Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...
This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse
's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.ftfy
Well, yes, that too.
I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.
It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)
TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...
@rc4 said:@CreatedToDislikeThis said:@HardwareGeek said:@uncreative said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!How have we not broken this thing yet?
Just give it a while.
Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.
It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo
Probably needs jeffing, though.
Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...
Yeah, good luck with that.
What's even worse is since makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...
Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...
This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse
's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.ftfy
Well, yes, that too.
I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.
It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)
TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...
Hrm... that's interesting....
What is?
You can quote multiple times... but apparently it breaks discoparser if you quote it again too... more interesting
@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@HardwareGeek said:@PleegWat said:@uncreative said:@Magus said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@Magus said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
@rc4 said:@tar said:@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
Damn you all to hell...
You didn't add to the quote nest!
Fixed.
Race conditions FTW! How hasn't this broken yet?
@CreatedToDislikeThis said:@HardwareGeek said:@uncreative said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!How have we not broken this thing yet?
Just give it a while.
Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.
It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo
Probably needs jeffing, though.
Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...
Yeah, good luck with that.
What's even worse is since makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...
Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...
This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse
's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.ftfy
Well, yes, that too.
I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.
It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)
TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...
@rc4 said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!How have we not broken this thing yet?
Just give it a while.
Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.
It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo
Probably needs jeffing, though.
Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...
Yeah, good luck with that.
What's even worse is since makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...
Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...
This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse
's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.
ftfy
@uncreative said:@PleegWat said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@PleegWat said:@uncreative said:@Magus said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@Magus said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
I thought that was the point of discourse! Maintaining "Civilized Discourse" For the future of humanity!
Wouldn't Jeff like to think so...
At some point we're going to hit the CSS nesting depth.
No, he jus thinks trolling is only acceptable by him
Or maximum post size.
Master Chain
@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!How have we not broken this thing yet?
Just give it a while.
Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.
It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo
Probably needs jeffing, though.
Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...
Yeah, good luck with that.
What's even worse is since makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...
Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...
I can't seem to remember....
@rc4 said:@CreatedToDislikeThis said:@HardwareGeek said:@uncreative said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!How have we not broken this thing yet?
Just give it a while.
Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.
It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo
Probably needs jeffing, though.
Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...
Yeah, good luck with that.
What's even worse is since makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...
Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...
This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse
's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.ftfy
Well, yes, that too.
I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.
It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)
TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...
@rc4 said:@CreatedToDislikeThis said:@HardwareGeek said:@uncreative said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!How have we not broken this thing yet?
Just give it a while.
Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.
It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo
Probably needs jeffing, though.
Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...
Yeah, good luck with that.
What's even worse is since makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...
Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...
This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse
's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.ftfy
Well, yes, that too.
I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.
It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)
TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...
@rc4 said:@CreatedToDislikeThis said:@HardwareGeek said:@uncreative said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:@wood,181, topic:53070 said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!How have we not broken this thing yet?
Just give it a while.
Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.
It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo
Probably needs jeffing, though.
Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...
Yeah, good luck with that.
What's even worse is since makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...
Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...
This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse
's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.ftfy
Well, yes, that too.
I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.
It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)
TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...
Hrm... that's interesting....
Welp, that didn't take long.
"This page doesn't exist or is private"
I hope it's the latter...
@uncreative said:it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the serverThis is a discourse server.
true...
@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@tufty said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@HardwareGeek said:@PleegWat said:@uncreative said:@Magus said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@Magus said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.
Nested quotes is guys!
@tufty said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@tufty said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@tufty said:@HardwareGeek said:@PleegWat said:@uncreative said:@Magus said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@Magus said:@uncreative said:@rc4 said:@boomzilla said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:@rc4 said:@HardwareGeek said:he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.Except for "the big one."
That's why I said "trivial complaints."
Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.
Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.
This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O
We're back in the 90's!
Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!
You're going to crash the Exchange server!
Please remove me from this thread.
You didn't send that post via email. Try again.
Please remove me from this thread.
It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel
Maintaining chain for posterity
Posterity? On discourse?
More like "posterior."
We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!
Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.
So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?
We just got a little carried away.
It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways...
How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?
Also, sorry about your thread.
At least he can see what Civilized Discourse actually entails.
!@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...
You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...
We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!
Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!
PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!
Maybe we broke the notifications system?
If writing code was even 1/10th as fun as, say, solving Portal then I'd have no problem with it.
Writing code is a million times more fun to me than playing any game I've ever played. It is like this for many software developers I know. Just because you hate it doesn't mean everyone does.
Sometimes life is about the journey, not the destination. Yes, having a "Solution" in your head is nice and all, but finding the pitfalls and gotchas of implementing said solution is, to be honest, the biggest joy in my life.
The joy of using alternate programming languages is understanding someone else solution to a problem. In doing such, you gain a greater insight into the problem.
There usually isn't a single correct answer to a problem, but a multitude of great answers with their own tradeoffs.
I write code strictly for the joy of writing code. I just happen to get paid to do it as well.
Well I was interested in this thread, but now i have to mute it. Thanks you pieces of shit.
E_HUMOR_NOT_FOUND
C'mon @blakeyrat , It's friday, have some fun!
Here's a
This most definitely sounds like an issue with the company, not you.
Enjoy the fact that you didn't have to end up suffering there for long. If they didn't interact with you and coach you on how to become a better member of the team, that's completely on them.
Count your lucky stars and enjoy the next place.
Also, anyone who actually likes Ruby enough to learn it and is an active and trusted member of this forum, please raise your hand.
I don't like ruby, and not a 'trusted' member....yet.... but I have done some ruby work (training + a couple months) back in the day...
So, half hearted, "why the fuck am i doing this" hand raise here!
Status: I just held page down on this thread from post 1 till the end. Took 2 hours.
Related, This site really REALLY makes me want to write my own forum software. I think i'll start looking in to that...
@uncreative said:Welp, that didn't take long.You're surprised?
YMBN...
Oh, you are new-ish, right. Welcome to
TDWTFJeff!
Not entirely surprised. If anything, the swiftness of the disappearance DID surprised me, but in a "Wow... it really is THAT bad" kind of way.
@cregox fwiw, it was a surprisingly good post, and I really hope they made it private instead of censoring you. Please keep us updated on (at least) if they completely silenced you or are having "Civilized Discourse" on the topic.
No he's not. He'll be stone dead in a moment.
I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
So many things happen to me every day that makes me say this exactly. Usually around Trump 2016
Well, can you hang around for a couple of minutes? He won't be long.
Linux-using people don't understand that. Believe me, I've had that discussion before.
You've just been talking to the wrong linux people.
I've had the advantage of being late to the party, and only selectively reading the 'good stuff'
(i.e. shit I could use to manipulate my boss)
Had a cup with his kool aid on my desk. Glad to know I can pour it out instead of drinking it.
The name says it all. I'm "uncreative". New 'round these parts, figured i'd do a little "trial by fire". Seems like the best place to do that!
Rules:
Also, WTF!!!:
Gets a 1
Also gets a one?
This should be a 3
Really jumping on the "Discourse sux train"
Perhaps....
I do like being a lustful drunk in the woods!
And who's your favourite TDWTF author? grins
Hrm... don't know if i can single out an author... tbh i don't pay that much attention to who writes... adhd and all..
I remember this guy's face on a lot I've enjoyed though..
(i tend to pay attention to the author a little more when I enjoy the articles more than usual)
All communication goes on in regional languages (sometimes even in a high level team meeting )
I can vouch for this. Saw it happen even here in the US. A handful of Indian developers for a software partner started talking amongst themselves in their native language before switching gears back to English to talk with us.
Did I do well?
Sounds about right for the Fanboyiest fanboys of fApple fanboy fandom
.
filed under Alliteration rulz
I don't believe you
Is it so hard to believe that someone actually enjoys what they do? Are you really that jaded?
Do any of them produce good software?
Some, yes. Some, no. Such is the way with developers.
Again: I do not believe you.
Again: Is it really so hard to imagine a world where someone does, in fact, enjoy this?
Either that or you are Amish
Not quite, but did grow up in a luddite farming community where I didn't have access to computers and software growing up like I wanted to. Probably why I enjoy development to the level I do today.
If my problem is ..... learning Node.JS help me understand that?
Learning Node.JS, in this particular situation might not. But studying how other people approach the finer problems in your domain will help.
You're also a pathological liar.
True, but not about development. Except in the fact that what is true yesterday isn't always true tomorrow.