Navigation

    What the Daily WTF?

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    1. Home
    2. uncreative
    U
    • Profile
    • Following
    • Followers
    • Topics
    • Posts
    • Best
    • Groups

    uncreative

    @uncreative

    397
    Reputation
    125
    Posts
    760
    Profile views
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    uncreative Follow

    Best posts made by uncreative

    • RE: My responses to Jeff's tweets.

      In just 2 days, you guys have Jeff Attwood has completely ruined Jeff Atwood for me.

      I read his blog post today and it read like a guy just whining about nonsense.

      *welcomes the enlightenment of wtdwtf *

      posted in Funny stuff
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: ๐Ÿญ 40 bullshit likes or whatever - for blakey (The Blakeylikes thread) ๐Ÿ

      I wondered why the site crashed a little bit ago....

      posted in Meta
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      @rc4 said:

      @boomzilla said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: How is it possible someone in the lounge could be an asshole?

      Things are getting serious in here...

      (to lighten the mood :) )

      posted in Meta
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: How is it possible someone in the lounge could be an asshole?

      What is this "Red Dwarf"?

      *googles

      Oh shit, there goes my weekend.

      Thanks guys!

      posted in Meta
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      @rc4 said:

      @wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,181, topic:53070 said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      We just got a little carried away.

      It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways... :sadface:

      How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?

      Also, sorry about your thread.

      At least he can see what Civilized Discourseโ€Œโ„ข actually entails.

      !@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...

      You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...

      We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!

      Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!

      PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!

      What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.

      Nested quotes is :doing_it_wrong: guys!


      You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!

      How have we not broken this thing yet?

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      @rc4 said:

      @tufty said:
      @tufty said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @tufty said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @PleegWat said:
      @uncreative said:
      @Magus said:
      @boomzilla said:
      @rc4 said:
      @boomzilla said:
      @rc4 said:
      @Magus said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @boomzilla said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      We just got a little carried away.

      It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways... :sadface:

      How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?

      Also, sorry about your thread.

      At least he can see what Civilized Discourseโ€Œโ„ข actually entails.

      !@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...

      You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      @rc4 said:

      @tufty said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @PleegWat said:
      @uncreative said:
      @Magus said:
      @boomzilla said:
      @rc4 said:
      @boomzilla said:
      @rc4 said:
      @Magus said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @boomzilla said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      @Magus said:

      @boomzilla said:
      @rc4 said:
      @boomzilla said:
      @rc4 said:
      @Magus said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @boomzilla said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative

    Latest posts made by uncreative

    • RE: The :doing_it_wrong: of the discojuice huffing dude

      @kt_ said:

      Hey, don't you get it? It's Blakey! It's Friday, he's at his Windows 10 desktop insulting people and accusing them of being morons and destroying everything -- he is having fun!

      And that prevents me from making those comments anyway b/c I find it funny how?

      posted in Meta
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      Maybe we broke the notifications system?

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      @rc4 said:

      @uncreative said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @CreatedToDislikeThis said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @uncreative said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @tufty said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,181, topic:53070 said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      We just got a little carried away.

      It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways... :sadface:

      How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?

      Also, sorry about your thread.

      At least he can see what Civilized Discourseโ€Œโ„ข actually entails.

      !@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...

      You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...

      We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!

      Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!

      PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!

      What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.

      Nested quotes is :doing_it_wrong: guys!


      You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!

      How have we not broken this thing yet?

      Just give it a while.

      Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.

      It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      Probably needs jeffing, though.

      Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...

      Yeah, good luck with that. ๐ŸšŽ

      What's even worse is since ๐Ÿ’พ๐ŸŽ makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...

      Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...

      This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.

      ftfy

      Well, yes, that too.

      I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.

      It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)

      TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...

      @uncreative said:

      @rc4 said:
      @CreatedToDislikeThis said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @uncreative said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @tufty said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,181, topic:53070 said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      We just got a little carried away.

      It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways... :sadface:

      How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?

      Also, sorry about your thread.

      At least he can see what Civilized Discourseโ€Œโ„ข actually entails.

      !@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...

      You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...

      We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!

      Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!

      PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!

      What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.

      Nested quotes is :doing_it_wrong: guys!


      You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!

      How have we not broken this thing yet?

      Just give it a while.

      Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.

      It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      Probably needs jeffing, though.

      Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...

      Yeah, good luck with that. ๐ŸšŽ

      What's even worse is since ๐Ÿ’พ๐ŸŽ makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...

      Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...

      This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.

      ftfy

      Well, yes, that too.

      I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.

      It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)

      TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...

      @uncreative said:

      @rc4 said:
      @CreatedToDislikeThis said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @uncreative said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @tufty said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,181, topic:53070 said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      We just got a little carried away.

      It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways... :sadface:

      How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?

      Also, sorry about your thread.

      At least he can see what Civilized Discourseโ€Œโ„ข actually entails.

      !@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...

      You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...

      We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!

      Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!

      PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!

      What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.

      Nested quotes is :doing_it_wrong: guys!


      You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!

      How have we not broken this thing yet?

      Just give it a while.

      Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.

      It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      Probably needs jeffing, though.

      Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...

      Yeah, good luck with that. ๐ŸšŽ

      What's even worse is since ๐Ÿ’พ๐ŸŽ makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...

      Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...

      This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.

      ftfy

      Well, yes, that too.

      I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.

      It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)

      TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...

      Hrm... that's interesting....

      What is?

      You can quote multiple times... but apparently it breaks discoparser if you quote it again too... more interesting

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      @uncreative said:

      @rc4 said:
      @CreatedToDislikeThis said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @uncreative said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @tufty said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,181, topic:53070 said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      We just got a little carried away.

      It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways... :sadface:

      How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?

      Also, sorry about your thread.

      At least he can see what Civilized Discourseโ€Œโ„ข actually entails.

      !@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...

      You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...

      We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!

      Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!

      PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!

      What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.

      Nested quotes is :doing_it_wrong: guys!


      You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!

      How have we not broken this thing yet?

      Just give it a while.

      Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.

      It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      Probably needs jeffing, though.

      Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...

      Yeah, good luck with that. ๐ŸšŽ

      What's even worse is since ๐Ÿ’พ๐ŸŽ makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...

      Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...

      This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.

      ftfy

      Well, yes, that too.

      I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.

      It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)

      TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...

      @uncreative said:

      @rc4 said:
      @CreatedToDislikeThis said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @uncreative said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @tufty said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,181, topic:53070 said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      We just got a little carried away.

      It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways... :sadface:

      How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?

      Also, sorry about your thread.

      At least he can see what Civilized Discourseโ€Œโ„ข actually entails.

      !@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...

      You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...

      We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!

      Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!

      PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!

      What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.

      Nested quotes is :doing_it_wrong: guys!


      You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!

      How have we not broken this thing yet?

      Just give it a while.

      Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.

      It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      Probably needs jeffing, though.

      Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...

      Yeah, good luck with that. ๐ŸšŽ

      What's even worse is since ๐Ÿ’พ๐ŸŽ makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...

      Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...

      This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.

      ftfy

      Well, yes, that too.

      I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.

      It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)

      TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...

      @uncreative said:

      @rc4 said:
      @CreatedToDislikeThis said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @uncreative said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @tufty said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,181, topic:53070 said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      We just got a little carried away.

      It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways... :sadface:

      How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?

      Also, sorry about your thread.

      At least he can see what Civilized Discourseโ€Œโ„ข actually entails.

      !@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...

      You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...

      We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!

      Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!

      PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!

      What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.

      Nested quotes is :doing_it_wrong: guys!


      You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!

      How have we not broken this thing yet?

      Just give it a while.

      Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.

      It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      Probably needs jeffing, though.

      Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...

      Yeah, good luck with that. ๐ŸšŽ

      What's even worse is since ๐Ÿ’พ๐ŸŽ makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...

      Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...

      This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.

      ftfy

      Well, yes, that too.

      I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.

      It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)

      TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...

      Hrm... that's interesting....

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: GUI's gotta be doing it for some .DLL

      @Buddy said:

      No man has ever found it

      Glad I wasn't the only one who thought this

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: Another wise investment by Mozilla

      Apparently you haven't heard about about the gas station...

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/11/02/how-the-pentagon-spent-43-million-on-a-single-gas-station/

      posted in Side Bar WTF
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      @rc4 said:

      @uncreative said:
      it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server

      This is a discourse server.

      true...

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      @rc4 said:

      @CreatedToDislikeThis said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @uncreative said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @tufty said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,181, topic:53070 said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      We just got a little carried away.

      It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways... :sadface:

      How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?

      Also, sorry about your thread.

      At least he can see what Civilized Discourseโ€Œโ„ข actually entails.

      !@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...

      You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...

      We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!

      Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!

      PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!

      What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.

      Nested quotes is :doing_it_wrong: guys!


      You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!

      How have we not broken this thing yet?

      Just give it a while.

      Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.

      It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      Probably needs jeffing, though.

      Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...

      Yeah, good luck with that. ๐ŸšŽ

      What's even worse is since ๐Ÿ’พ๐ŸŽ makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...

      Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...

      This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.

      ftfy

      Well, yes, that too.

      I'm hoping this topic will improve the Diescourse cooties situation.

      It doesn't seem to be having a measurable effect (yet.)

      TECHNICALLY, it's just a few lines of text... so might not kill the server, but our browsers...

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The Official Status Thread

      ๐Ÿ˜‚

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative
    • RE: The New Likes Topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      @HardwareGeek said:

      @rc4 said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @tufty said:
      @rc4 said:
      @HardwareGeek said:
      @rc4 said:
      @uncreative said:
      @rc4 said:
      @wood,249, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,248, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,247, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,246, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,245, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,244, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,243, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,242, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,241, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,240, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,239, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,238, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,237, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,234, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,231, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,224, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,223, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,222, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,221, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,220, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,219, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,218, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,217, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,216, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,214, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,213, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,212, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,210, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,208, topic:53070, full:true said:
      @wood,181, topic:53070 said:
      he mostly agrees with trivial complaints about the UI.

      Except for "the big one." ๐Ÿ˜†

      That's why I said "trivial complaints."

      Two buttons being flipped on mobile/desktop is pretty trivial.

      Well...you know...mostly. When he can be bothered to understand the report.

      This is the first time I've ever seen nested discoquoting work more than 2 levels deep! :O

      We're back in the 90's!

      Oh come on, We've done this before! Everyone, stop pressing 'reply all'!

      You're going to crash the Exchange server!

      Please remove me from this thread.

      You didn't send that post via email. Try again.

      Please remove me from this thread.

      It was quite fun seeing this happen at Intel

      Maintaining chain for posterity

      Posterity? On discourse?

      More like "posterior."

      We are nearing the point at which the streams cross. Cross the streams!

      Don't cross the steams. It would be bad.

      So are we maintaining multiple reply all threads now? Is that it?

      We just got a little carried away.

      It's ok. We'll just keep this one gong instead. It's fine. Not like I put any work into the other one anyways... :sadface:

      How could crossing the streams be any worse than "normal" civilised discourse?

      Also, sorry about your thread.

      At least he can see what Civilized Discourseโ€Œโ„ข actually entails.

      !@!! YOU DARE QUESTION MY VISION!! Ban for you! Ban for you! ban for you! (you're cool)...

      You thought i was serious? I'm just running out of sarcasm topics, had to find one somewhere...

      We have reached verticality! I repeat, we have reached verticality!

      Next comes The Singularity. Thanks @wood!

      PLAD!! MAKE IT TO PLAD!

      What I like perhaps above all is that, although it fails to actually render the text, it keeps vertical space for it.

      Nested quotes is :doing_it_wrong: guys!


      You're right! They've all become @wood! OH GOD!

      How have we not broken this thing yet?

      Just give it a while.

      Dammit, I get quote notifications for every one of these. It's almost as bad as the original likes topic.

      It's the new likes topic: Part 2: The Quotes Topic: Electric Boogaloo

      Probably needs jeffing, though.

      Yeah, that's what I was hinting at. @boomzilla? About your job...

      Yeah, good luck with that. ๐ŸšŽ

      What's even worse is since ๐Ÿ’พ๐ŸŽ makes you click on each post you want to jeff, he's got a lot of scrolling ahead of him...

      Anyhow...where were we? Oh yes...

      This topic really illustrates the lameness of Discourse's implementation of post-by-post navigation (i.e., J/K), which jumps to the middle of the target post, not its beginning.

      ftfy

      posted in General
      U
      uncreative