Oh man, this is the quality of a reply I expected from a EFL developer.
@branko-badrljica said in Enlightened:
Who cares whether it takes you one or three lines to add a button ?
Anyone who writes programs. And their managers. And their bosses. And their customers. And the users. So nobody, really.
@branko-badrljica said in Enlightened:
And since there are plenty crappy Qt applications around, I'd say fundamental part is far from menu and widget cintrol code.
There are plenty of crappy apps in any framework. It so happens, all made with EFL are such.
@branko-badrljica said in Enlightened:
Also, he conveniently omitted all that dependency hell of Qt apps.
Oh, yeah - you want to deploy a qt app, you run [your os]deployqt tool and that's it - you get all the deps in one folder/package. The horror!
Also, not sure what that has to do with EFL still being a pile of dog crap.
@branko-badrljica said in Enlightened:
I get routinely into situation where two packages conflict about needed version of Qt stuff.
Look at that, you get conflicts on lib versions. That's so unusual when people don't know how to deploy their apps with deps. But EFL is better at this right? Especially when you have an earlier version without the needed API. I'm sure the magic of the Enlightened Ones will make that API suddenly appear for the application.
@branko-badrljica said in Enlightened:
With enlightenment, it's easy. About all I need is EFL.
Apparently, a brain too. Seriously - you're working for them or are you simply a masochist?