Goddamit, Clean up the fucking RSS feed. I checked my google reader at work todayonly to have freakin russian porn pop up past our webfilters.
maybe you could try installing forum software not written by braindead monkeys.
Goddamit, Clean up the fucking RSS feed. I checked my google reader at work todayonly to have freakin russian porn pop up past our webfilters.
maybe you could try installing forum software not written by braindead monkeys.
@morbiuswilters said:
@Nozz said:
@Heron said:
@morbiuswilters said:
I'm not a homosexual, so this is not a possibility.
There are several ways to transmit AIDS that do not involve homosexual activity. One of those ways is heterosexual activity.
I don't think that's going to be a problem for him either.
Right, because there's no way the HIV is going to swim up my urethra (can viruses even swim?) and it's not like I have any open wounds. Finally someone backs me up!
a) it doesn't have to swim up your urethra
b) you don't have to have visible open wounds, a simple microtear [which almost always happen] is more than sufficient (that being said the strain prevalent in the US is much more easily transmitted man->woman than woman->man but it IS transmittable both ways)
c) he's saying you're not likely to ever get laid so you won't be exposed via sexual activity
d) you're a fucking bigot
@morbiuswilters said:
@danixdefcon5 said:
@amischiefr said:
throw new AIDSException("Oops!");Nice, but now you have left yourself open for a virus.
I'm not a homosexual, so this is not a possibility.
there are many ways to get it
Sex - straight, gay, bi, ANY TYPE
Needles
Blood Transfusions
the highest rate of infection is among hetereosexual women (probably because bigoted men like you that assume non-gays are immune so go around and make like rabbits without protection)
more likely you got a different data store on the second search request - they don't keep all their data stores precisely in sync.
each of their datacenters contains one or more data stores which are comprised of a large number of systems - it could be even on the same data store the first time one of the systems didn't respond fast enough for the content rendering node and its results got excluded for the sake of fast response.
(i interviewed for a position with google SRE last spring, did my homework on their datacenter architecture)
that's what you get when you get someone with a CCIE as the head of computer security :P
@amischiefr said:
@DOA said:
Sounds good to me. I'm so fucking sick and tired of taking in random lungfuls of smoke because it's a bit windy and some guy 5m away just has to have that cigarette or he'll die from withdrawal symptoms. As far as I'm concerned smokers should be "moved on" until they cannot possibly annoy anyone. May I suggest some place around the middle of the Pacific?
I mean seriously was peer pressure in highchool so strong that you have to die before your time gasping from breath? Grow a pair and stand up for yourself. Or was it so difficult to understand that when EVERYONE said smoking is bad for you then maybe, just maybe, it's bad for you?
<sarcasm>Wow, your comments are always so insightful.</sarcasm>
Maybe you should be the one to stand out in the middle ofthe Pacific. We're sick and tired of you all whining about it just as much as you are. Smoking is not illegal. To say that you have more rights than any other citizen because you are a non smoker is just retarded.
I agree that smokers should be removed from the front of the building, and that they should be placed somewhere that does not interfere with the general traffic in and out of the building. I agree with non-smoking facilities. What I don't agree with is trying to stomp out smokers because you don't like it. Just give them a place to smoke that is out of the way and that non-smokers do not have to walk past, end of story. If people want to smoke let them.
is legal now
is not a right
is a violation of the rights of others
what is legal and what is right don't always end up being the same thing
it's not "whining" to be pissed off at incosiderate self-centered fucktards who insist on poisoning YOU for THEIR pleasure
by your logic i have the right to come inject you with toxins for my enjoyment! and if you object "you're just whining"
@campkev said:
@NSCoder said:
Maybe having to stand out by the road would be an extra encouragement to quit, maybe not. It's up to you whether you quit smoking or not (yes, really, it's not impossible) but there's no point whinging if you're not allowed to do it on a non-smoking estate, and expecting everyone else to accommodate your addiction. It's your addiction, you deal with it.
I agree despite (or maybe because of) the fact that I'm a former smoker myself. Instead of preaching to our kids about not smoking, my wife and I just react to people smoking the same way we would if they reached inside their pants to scratch their butt and then licked their fingers.
has it worked? that's why my wife and I planned on doing (it's what we do anyway) around our kids if/when we have them
@tdb said:
TRWTF is that people willingly destroy their health and the health of those around them by smoking.
FTFW ... I avoid smokers like the plague for two reasons
A) i like my health
B) my nose and lungs aren't desensatized to the toxens so I have exposure symptoms (headache, difficulty breathing) if they're 100m up wind of me...
yay for trying to stay healthy in a world full of inconsiderate addicted pollution factories
another less wtf-y replacement for this is having an interface for page classe and then action= the class name of the appropriate page class
you could even have some class-autoload hooks in the background to load the appropriate php file containing the class as needed so you don't have a huge list of include/require/require_onces hiding around somewhere
as for going to /foo.php instead of /index.php?pg=foo i think using mod_rewrites on a apache you go do with this a rule that to the effect of
/(*)\.php(.*)/i
if \1 != index then rewrite with index.php?pg=\1&\2
else don't modify
call me an asshole.. but if you cannot be bothered to even follow basic security best practices you get what you get.
possible artififact of old functionality?
@morbiuswilters said:
@Kazan said:
http://electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Pres/Graphs/new-mexico.htmlHoly crap, most of the results on that site are ridiculous. I suppose it reaffirms the uselessness of polls. I sincerely doubt that there was ever a period where McCain and Obama were tied in Massachusetts and there is no way Obama has lost 10% over the last few months in his home state of Illinois. Illinois would probably be 65% for the Democrat even if he wasn't a popular black candidate from Chicago.
he's gathering and using data from the major pollsters... he never makes any claims as to their accuracy... we know most polls these days suffer from pretty serious selection bias that's going to favor mccain
preserved for future
</font><snippet removed by moderator>
<font size="2" face="Arial">Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server</font> <font size="2" face="Arial">error '80040e37'</font>
<font size="2" face="Arial">Invalid object name 'tbl_Directory'.</font>
<font size="2"><font face="Arial"><snippet removed> </font></font>
<font size="2"><font face="Arial"></font></font><font size="2" face="Arial">
@tster said:
What is this a map of? if it's for presidential candidates Obama vs McCain, then they habe TERRIBLE polls. NM as solid dem for instance. If it is for congress or something, then WTF are they talking about the electoral college for?
http://electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Pres/Graphs/new-mexico.html
@danixdefcon5 said:
They used Windows in the Olympics? Eek! I hope the "scoring system" isn't running that ... though it would be interesting to see a competitor getting lots of NaN scores....
wtf?
@DaveK said:
@morbiuswilters said:
@danixdefcon5 said:
Checking the sourcecode shows this in the image src:
http://imagebin.ca/img/lsE9V6dJ.png
However that link responds "Sorry, you can't do this from here." Looks like a case of IMG quoting FAIL.
Thank you. I was too lazy to dig through CS's fugly HTML but I figured it was something like that.
You must not be using FF; the "View selection source" option on the right-click context menu makes it trivially easy to find the relevant bit of source by highlighting the area just before and after a missing image (or any other point on the page where something's not rendered right for any reason). No digging required!
you must be knew here to not realize that morbius would never use anything other than IE
you're feeding her mental issues by sending her emails at all.
@chebrock said:
@morbiuswilters said:
A large, sophisticated one?Ive been developing for 10 years. Maybe I'm stupid, lucky, lazy, or all of the above, but I've never had a web development project last longer than 6 months.
then you've never worked on anything nearly as large as some of the stuff I worked on. At one place I worked we were a state contractor- we had one program in maintenance mode (my first job as an employee there was a recode of one of it's modules). The application's job was to track the professional licenses issued to 6 different professionals - the section that I cut my teeth on was the Real Estate Firms/Brokers licensing section. It was mostly an application for the department that issues these licenses to use to track them, but it also had a website that could process online self-renewals from the various people. (Also had like HVAC licensed techs, etc).
Two of my coworkers spent 14 months writing a new application that managed about 17 different licenses, not sharing a single license type with my application - these two were damn good coders, and fast coders - maybe 5-10% of their time was consumed in planning meetings with the customer for the application (another state government agency). When the application was finally finished and went to production it was blazing fast, easy to use (70 year old barely-tech-literate government employees were using it without issues).
They even added modules to the renewals website for the other application to now plugin to the new application so it can process self renewals for either.
PS: each license in both applications has it's own fully developed set of business rules, and it's own discrete database behind it - each application then has 1 additional statebase for storing program-wide information like user accounts, etc
[edit] that was 14 months of about 80% of their coding time, they did have a few other things to work on
@taylonr said:
There are two things that make me think this is fake. First, it's a woman in IT. Second, it's well written, and the number of IT people who can actually write, seem to be statistically insignificant.
All joking aside, looks interesting, and I'll check it out.
stfu - I know several very hot, very intelligent and very adept female coders... couple from college and one from a place I used to work
welcome - get ready to be flamed for linking to your blog
get ready to be hit on by desperate nerds for being female
PS: link is broken.. it inserted a space at the end before the /
@morbiuswilters said:
The Sun isn't a renewable resource either, but it's still vast enough for me to not worry about running out.
did you just try to claim, by implication, that we have so much oil we don't need to worry about running out?
wow.. what rock have you been living under for the last 30 years
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@elamberton said:
How does one define an unsafe class in VB?Better question: Why would you declare an unsafe class in C# or anything else?
because you want to do some real work?
I kid i kid :D
@Bulb said:
I just came across this little gem of option parsing:
if (strncmp("-file",token,5)==NULL) // file
{
sscanf( token,"-file%s", szFile );
// quick hack to allow spaces in path/file names
// spaces must be given as '*'
char *tmp;
for ( tmp=szFile; *tmp; tmp++ )
{
if (*tmp=='*')
*tmp=' ';
}
}To be fair, it's Windows code where all arguments come in a single string.
parsing lpCmdLine aye?
for those of our not familiar with raw win32 API this is the equivalent if int main(int argc, char argv*[])
int WINAPI WinMain(
HINSTANCE hInstance,
HINSTANCE hPrevInstance,
LPSTR lpCmdLine,
int nCmdShow
);
@Weng said:
Yeah, really. If they can physically attack the mail server... The database server is probably about 2 feet left, right, up, or down from there.
typically.. but not in the case of their apps
@vt_mruhlin said:
@Kazan said:
or physical access to their exchange server, which should only contain non-sensative data,Isn't it a kind of common assumption that corporate email does contain sensitive information?
i don't include what most companies i've worked for consider sensative in my definition of sensative - ex: how they do price estimates? whatever.
by sensative I mean SSNs.
i was thinking the same as you taylonr- i'm assuming they're just supposed to remember their active diretory login, or write it down.
or physical access to their exchange server, which should only contain non-sensative data, but due to the WTF here contains passwords to the systems that contain sensative data.
Never forget physical attacks on infrastructure. That is assuming you couldn't social engineer or dictionary attack some luser on this system's password.
So my mom started a new job at a call center related to social security, medicare, etc - not a government agency a private support company. Old people call in and get assistance managing their stuff.
They're very big on security - after all their various applications have access to some sensative data. So they require complex passwords (3 part - numeric, alpha, special at minimum), you get yelled at if you walk away from your workstation without first remembering to lock it, you're not supposed to wear your badge anywhere off work grounds so you don't accidentally loose it and some stranger uses your photo ID badge to impersonate you, so on and so forth.
After all of these instructions on how to be secure, they tell you to store your passwords "in your email" (aka email yourslf, leaving a message with your passwords on their exchange server).
@Welbog said:
@WeatherGod said:
The ones who went back typically were the ones who just could not seem to do without MS Office or could not live without their video games.What kind of a sick freak gives up video games to switch operating systems?
none... a great great many games that don't have linux ports run just fine under Wine 1.x
@morbiuswilters said:
@Kazan said:
I seriously couldn't care less about market share beyond the fact that some people here feel the need to cut the numbers by orders of magnitudeBullshit. Here's a report for the last 24 months: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpdt=1&qpct=4&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=90&qpnp=25# They gather stats on 160 million unique visitors per month and have several mainstream sites like NYTimes, WSJ and TheStreet. So even optimistically Linux only holds a 0.8% market share of average-to-heavy Internet users. This neglects all of the Mac and Windows users who surf the web very little, which does artificially skew the numbers for Linux a bit higher. So 0.5% certainly was correct.
go take a statistics class you troll.
Hint: there is a thing called sampling bias
re: bstorer
was having a hard time finding recent articles on it on google -I seriously couldn't care less about market share beyond the fact that some people here feel the need to cut the numbers by orders of magnitude
MPS you truly are pathetic - keep ignoring the legitimate issues I raised with "it's fud" repeated to infinity. $250? they must have lowered the price recently - it used to be like $600
either way it's a barrier to entry - look up the definition for that - what a barrier for entry is (something that makes it harder to do what you want to do)
can you give a sound reason for microsoft to disallow power users from bypassing driver signing on 64-bit without having to disable other subsystems?
Of course, i don't expect you to actually reply to my concerns - you're just going to scream that it's FUD again and go off on a separate tangent. You are guilty of what you keep accusing me of being. Fuck dude I'm considering working for microsoft's business divison. Stop making assumptions about me and answer the criticism or SHUT THE HELL UP
@bstorer said:
@morbiuswilters said:I think the number was combined server + desktop market share. But that's still way too high, as most estimates give Linux about 12% server market share, and I sincerely doubt that servers outnumber desktops.@bstorer said:
@archivator said:Probably not. I picked the highest figure a quick Google search turned up.@bstorer said:
it's whopping 7% market shareWe passed the 5 percent? WOHOOOO! We need FIREWORKS!
That is the most absurd number imaginable. Linux has less than 0.5% penetration on the desktop. Apple is around 6-8%, for Christ's sake and you know Linux is nowhere near that.
you're numbers are pathetically small - last i saw their server market share was around 25%
http://www.oreillynet.com/manila/tim/stories/storyReader$56
that 7% number comes from here and is % of entire market
http://blogs.zdnet.com/ITFacts/?p=68
apache has half the httpd market according to netcraft.. and you know less than half of those machines are running windows
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2008/06/22/june_2008_web_server_survey.html
several major vendors (HP, etc) are selling linux on laptops.
Let's try to be accurate with the numbers people - no matter how many technical flaws windows has i wouldn't say it has half the market penetration it has let's try to show some intellectual honesty
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Kazan said:Can you defend their practice of making companies fork out money to be allowed to write drivers?Yes. I already have. I know I will never satisfy your criticism and I don't care, your opinion of MS's practices means next to nothing to me or anyone else here.
where exactly is this defense?
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Kazan said:
Pointing out a SPECIFIC and concerete issue cannot qualify as FUD by any reasonable definition.It is when you try and turn it into and issue by not giving the whole story and trying to make a problem where there isn't one.
exactly what part of the story did i leave out?
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Kazan said:
It is a REAL issue that microsoft requires companies to buy very expensive licenses to write drivers for windows, which denies market entry to small developers and non-comercial developers. Real applications such as ATITray have been harmed by this. A company wrote a driver that would allow you to chain load other drivers with it so you could use your software - it took a knowledgeable user to use, would be nearly impossible to stealth install, etc. Fortunately for this company they bought a second certification signature for this driver - because microsoft labeled it malware, revoked the cert, and put it's signature into windows defender.Citation needed here. FOSS applications are obtaining them. There is no conspiracy beyond your /. FUD. We have seen it all before, it is getting old and boring.
http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2007/08/07/microsoft-revokes-companys-digital-certificate-prevents-unsigned-driver-loading?rel
http://www.linchpinlabs.com/resources/atsiv/usage-design.htm
didn't expect me to have a citation did you troll?
throw around the term FUD all you want - it's NOT fud when it's a concrete solid issue. Just because some OSS projects can raise the funds required doesn't mean it's not a barrier to entry. You seem to not understand what that term means, take a basic college intro to economics class.
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Kazan said:
wow because obviously i mentioned linux AT ALL in my post.You don't have to. We can all see where it is going. You seem to think you are something special, but your type is a dime a dozen. You are one of the most boring of that type too.
I didn't mention linux, I didn't have any intention to either. Perhaps when you stop making assumptions you won't be such an ass. You're pathetic, you're like a scientologist defending their nutjobbery.
@morbiuswilters said:
@Kazan said:
as do i.. which makes me think it's more of a policy decision for those companies than a financial one (well.. a policy one based on financial)
but creates a barrier to entry, not all small projects - closed or open source - can raise the money
I don't know about the rest of you, but I make it a habit to buy all of my hardware from companies so small and poor that they can't even raise as much money as an open source project. That's why I'm opposed to the added security of signed drivers!
troll much?
A) I never said signed drivers were bad, i said REQUIRING them is. I should be able to install them and tell windows "yes shut the fuck up i know what i'm doing"
B) Do you understand the definition of a policy decision?
C) do you understand that that primary non-comercial products such as ATI Tray are what is harmed by this
D) Do you ever stop trolling for 20 seconds and engage your brain?
@ammoQ said:
@bstorer said:
Well then perhaps they should develop for Linux and it's whopping 7% market share. That sounds like a good business plan.
Of course they should not develop for Linux only, but IMO it makes sense to get 7% of the market that the competition can't get. For example, Epson all-in-one printers like the DX4050 work well with Linux (both printing and scanning), while comparable devices from Canon do not. If other vendors (HP, Lexmark etc.) ignore the Linux market too, it means Epson gets 7% of the market for sure, while it has to fight for the remaining 93% against several competitors.
BTW, offering enough information so the "community" can write their own drivers is enough in many cases.
yup.. Hauppauge has a long reputation for providing all the information needed to get their gear working in linux. they have so many people purchase their hardware to use with mythtv that they hired on someone closely related to mythtv to maintain the linux drivers.
@ender said:
@Kazan said:Maybe a lot of those hardware manufacturer's don't want to pay microsoft the ransom money to be allowed to write drivers for vista that can be loaded. Maybe they don't think that it is a very good business decision to pay into such demands because microsoft will just keep raising the ransom demand every iteration of windows.I find it interesting that several free and open-source projects can get signed Vista drivers, while some hardware manufacturers still can't.
as do i.. which makes me think it's more of a policy decision for those companies than a financial one (well.. a policy one based on financial)
but creates a barrier to entry, not all small projects - closed or open source - can raise the money
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Kazan said:
you keep defending microsoft and saying it's the hardware vendor's problem there isn't drivers.Who does? Who are you replying to?
considering your reply I would say you knew exactly what troll I was speaking to.
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Kazan said:
Maybe a lot of those hardware manufacturer's don't want to pay microsoft the ransom money to be allowed to write drivers for vista that can be loaded.
FUD.Try and get a clue what you are talking about please.
That term doesn't mean what it thinks you mean.
Can you defend their practice of making companies fork out money to be allowed to write drivers?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt
Pointing out a SPECIFIC and concerete issue cannot qualify as FUD by any reasonable definition. It is a REAL issue that microsoft requires companies to buy very expensive licenses to write drivers for windows, which denies market entry to small developers and non-comercial developers. Real applications such as ATITray have been harmed by this. A company wrote a driver that would allow you to chain load other drivers with it so you could use your software - it took a knowledgeable user to use, would be nearly impossible to stealth install, etc. Fortunately for this company they bought a second certification signature for this driver - because microsoft labeled it malware, revoked the cert, and put it's signature into windows defender.
If you would care to explain how specific examples creating clear problems is FUD then be my guest. However know that you are blatantly misusing the term to change the subject away from the actual point mentioned because you cannot criticize the point.
Stop trying to change the subject and address the criticism
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Kazan said:
Maybe they don't think that it is a very good business decision to pay into such demands because microsoft will just keep raising the ransom demand every iteration of windows.Really? Funny, you would think they would be FLOCKING to Linux then!
wow because obviously i mentioned linux AT ALL in my post. You know it should be possible to post a criticism of windows without this become a windows vs linux argument - especially not where I post salient points and you just try to dismiss them as FUD and then make some attack on linux that isn't related to my point in the slightest.
you keep defending microsoft and saying it's the hardware vendor's problem there isn't drivers.
Maybe a lot of those hardware manufacturer's don't want to pay microsoft the ransom money to be allowed to write drivers for vista that can be loaded. Maybe they don't think that it is a very good business decision to pay into such demands because microsoft will just keep raising the ransom demand every iteration of windows.
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Hitsuji said:
this had a tendency to rub off on Windows specific and MS SQL Server specific developer. Hence my comment that the Pronounciation of SQL as Sequel seems to MS specific.You don't think that it might have something to do with many open source crusaders being pedantic, shallow and elitist?
no more than microsoft elistists
every camp has their dickwads.
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Kazan said:
normally i think MPS is a flaming jackassBased entirely on me flaming you in the IRC channel for spewing ridiculous FUD might I add.
after i posted a few legitimate issues with a software from a company you seem to irrationally defend.. You accuse me of spewing "FUD" by pointing out a few flaws, while you simultaneously act like a cheer leader looking to get boned and the company is your big hunky althete
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Kazan said:
but seriously peopleFunny, because everyone seems to get that, except for just one jackass who has since been corrected.
But seriously people, get a sense of humor. (PROTIP: By 'people' I mean 'Kazan')
I just saw people keep posting the same thing, sarcasm doesn't come through well on text sometimes... need I dig up that study they did about that
@MasterPlanSoftware said:
@Kazan said:
that expensive reportThat expense report is far from expensive.
omg, i made a typo.. your'e so witty!
normally i think MPS is a flaming jackass.. but seriously people - he claimed miles for DRIVING HIS OWN CAR TO THE AIRPORT (looks like he's about the same distance away from the nearest airport as I am) then his rental car at his destination
in fact that expensive report looks a hell of a lot like the expense report I had for reimbursement for a job interview I was flown across the country for a few months back (the numbers aren't exactly the samke but the jist is pretty close - like I was claiming comp for the hotel room, the company prepaid for the car)
So, I'm going to be writing an application that uses the fedex adddress validation service. Now this is one of their "advanced" services which means to use the production servers you need to get a production key, a vaguely explained process that seems to involve them wanting to take a peek at your app to make sure you're not going to open their systems to massive exploiting. This means they have a dev server to test against.
So Here i am writing a simple test to check that phpSoap, etc is going to get along with it and to get to know the system. All I did was create a SoapClient instance with the wsdl provided, get my request all cleaned up and working and the response i get.
Authentication Failure Error.
I scratch my head at this point because I had used the logon information they provided me, even went and rerequested it to double check. Still no joy. I pull the SOAP request out of the library to compare it to the documentation I have - looks fine.
Ok, now I'm stumped.
So I call Fedex's Web Services tech support.
"It's not documented, but Address Validation doesn't work with test. You need to get a production key then call us back and we'll activate it."
I'm not sure what is the WTF here
1) They provide a dev server, it doesn't work
2) The supposedly want to vet your software, but due to #1 they'll bypass the vetting process
don't you two have something to do other than be internet trolls
No it causes the operating system to bitch at you*
*dependant on operating syste
@Nandurius said:
@Kazan said:
yes because let's do one additional subtract-immediate operation every time we do an array index... it won't add up to billions of instructions or anythingWhy would you have to execute an add instruction? If it's defined to work this way in the language, the compiler can take care of this. For example, you can store the memory address minus one for array references.
You don't really want to move away from 0-based indexes, as that's what is commonly used in mathematics. Unfortunately the one program that tried to 'simplify' indexing is Matlab, which starts indexes at 1, which makes entering (0-based) formulas needlessly confusing.
You have a point about storing a pre-offested memory addresses for the base address.. however it has the problem of making your array pointers and normal pointers no longer equivalent and forgetting this and using an array pointer as a normal pointer (something i do often - especially when saving/loading binary blobls of data that don't require representation transformations) can lead to crashes, etc
yes because let's do one additional subtract-immediate operation every time we do an array index... it won't add up to billions of instructions or anything
You must generate some good WTFs with your total disregard for TECHNICAL reasons for doing things.
@vt_mruhlin said:
Future profanity will come from backlash against growing political correctness.
"this fucking door won't shut." -- offensive.
"this goddamned motherfucking wooden hinged portal cover won't align itself so as to disallow entry, but that's ok because we're all allowed to make our own decisions in life." -- correct
I never understood what people's problem with "political correctness" in and of itself is. Now when it's taken to excess sure make fun of that excess but not the entire concept of not being a douchebag to one another.
but then maybe they're using the term expressly meaning when it's taken to excess and not including it's fundamental intent to refrain from being a douchebag to each other.
Seriously how hard is it not to use "Jew", "Fag", "Nigger", derogatorily?
the fact we have a category of phonome strings that we consider inherently vulgar with no logical reason is a WTF
(now something that refers to a group of people being used as a derogatory is logical and understandable - someone saying "I got Jewed", "That's gay!", etc)