Web Dev's & TheDailyWTF



  • Have a look at the IE windows listed on the bottom.......

     

     

     

     http://www.orangelabel.com/icons.htm

     

    The irony is that he also has TheDailyWTF open?!!?!?!?!?

     

     

     



  • If I were you, I'd take cover NOW !



  • Call the posse!



  • Seriously, you couldn't look a few posts down to see if this had already been posted?

    Or maybe on the front page?



  • @belgariontheking said:

    Seriously, you couldn't look a few posts down to see if this had already been posted?

    Or maybe on the front page?

    Duplicates are an important part of the environment here on TDWTF. They allow those suffering from anterograde amnesia an opportunity to enjoy it again for the second time.



  • @belgariontheking said:

    Seriously, you couldn't look a few posts down to see if this had already been posted?

    Or maybe on the front page?

    Duplicates are an important part of the environment here on TDWTF. They allow those suffering from anterograde amnesia an opportunity to enjoy it again for the second time.



  •  In these people's defence, this one has yet to stop making me laugh every time I see it.



  • @belgariontheking said:

    Seriously, you couldn't look a few posts down to see if this had already been posted?

    Or maybe on the front page?

     

    Duplicates are an important part of the environment here on TDWTF. They
    allow those suffering from anterograde amnesia an opportunity to enjoy
    it again for the second time.



  • Have any of you guys seen this? 

     

     

    The crazy thing is, not only is there a porn site on there, but they also have TDWTF open!  Crazy! 



  • You all missed the Real WTF (okay, not too much of a wtf): if it was a genuine TDWTF window, the window caption would've been "The Daily WTF: Curious Perversions in Information Technology - Internet Explorer", not "thedailywtf....".



  • Not necessarily; the screen-capture might have been taken whilst the page was still loading. Well spotted anyway, though.



  • @Spectre said:

    You all missed the Real WTF (okay, not too much of a wtf): if it was a genuine TDWTF window, the window caption would've been "The Daily WTF: Curious Perversions in Information Technology - Internet Explorer", not "thedailywtf....".
    yes, THAT is why it was posted many times over between here and the front page.  THAT is the reason.

    Did you bother to make the same check to see if myfirstsexteacher button had the correct title?



  • @belgariontheking said:

    Or maybe on the front page?
    Check the front page more closely. On that desktop, TDWTF isn't open. One can assume that they looked at their referrer information and added it later.



  • @TwelveBaud said:

    @belgariontheking said:

    Or maybe on the front page?
    Check the front page more closely. On that desktop, TDWTF isn't open. One can assume that they looked at their referrer information and added it later.

    This was posted in the front page comments right after it happened, then this thread was created and then a 2nd sidebar thread was created today.  This is fucking ridiculous. 



  • @TwelveBaud said:

    @belgariontheking said:

    Or maybe on the front page?
    Check the front page more closely. On that desktop, TDWTF isn't open. One can assume that they looked at their referrer information and added it later.

    Please try to keep up. Maybe this will help:



  • @bstorer said:

    Please try to keep up. Maybe this will help:

     

    O_o

     

    Uh... a board game?  Caz he's "bored" us with his comment? 



  • @morbiuswilters said:

    Uh... a board game?  Caz he's "bored" us with his comment? 

    No, no, no. Look at the picture again. It's called "the case of the missing chocolate cake," but as you can plainly see, there's a cake right there on the table. Now, that leaves two possibilities: 1) those people are the worst detectives in the history of time, and I find the odds of the six worst detectives ever being in the same place at the same time highly unlikely, or 2) that cake on the table isn't chocolate. So what is the cake, then? I think it's pretty obvious that is a shit cake. Now, notice that someone has taken a slice out of that cake, presumably to eat it, thus, I am telling him to eat shit.



  • @morbiuswilters said:

    Uh... a board game?  Caz he's "bored" us with his comment? 
     

    No, because if you look closely, Colonel Mustard is reading thedailywtf.com on his iPhone. 



  • @bstorer said:

    @morbiuswilters said:

     

    Uh... a board game?  Caz he's "bored" us with his comment? 

    No, no, no. Look at the picture again. It's called "the case of the missing chocolate cake," but as you can plainly see, there's a cake right there on the table. Now, that leaves two possibilities: 1) those people are the worst detectives in the history of time, and I find the odds of the six worst detectives ever being in the same place at the same time highly unlikely, or 2) that cake on the table isn't chocolate. So what is the cake, then? I think it's pretty obvious that is a shit cake. Now, notice that someone has taken a slice out of that cake, presumably to eat it, thus, I am telling him to eat shit.
     

     

    No no no, CLEARLY that cake is a vanilla cake with chocolate icing, hence the chocolate cake is still missing.  Please try to keep your shit eating fantasies out of TDWTF.



  • @amischiefr said:

    @bstorer said:

    No, no, no. Look at the picture again. It's called "the case of the missing chocolate cake," but as you can plainly see, there's a cake right there on the table. Now, that leaves two possibilities: 1) those people are the worst detectives in the history of time, and I find the odds of the six worst detectives ever being in the same place at the same time highly unlikely, or 2) that cake on the table isn't chocolate. So what is the cake, then? I think it's pretty obvious that is a shit cake. Now, notice that someone has taken a slice out of that cake, presumably to eat it, thus, I am telling him to eat shit.
     

     

    No no no, CLEARLY that cake is a vanilla cake with chocolate icing, hence the chocolate cake is still missing.  Please try to keep your shit eating fantasies out of TDWTF.

    You just don't get it, do you? Have you ever tried to make the actual cake with shit? Let me tell you something: it doesn't work. It never sets up right; it's always either way too moist or way too firm. Instead, you ice the cake with shit. Now, I'll grant you that the missing chocolate cake could also be iced with shit, but the fact still remains that it's clearly a shit cake sitting on that table with a slice taken out of it.



  • @bstorer said:

    No, no, no. Look at the picture again. It's called "the case of the missing chocolate cake," but as you can plainly see, there's a cake right there on the table.

    Maybe the cake wasn't stolen, but Professor Plum just had an "understanding" with Colonel Mustard where the Professor would eat cake he found and the Colonel would pay for it.



  • @bstorer said:

    You just don't get it, do you? Have you ever tried to make the actual cake with shit? Let me tell you something: it doesn't work. It never sets up right; it's always either way too moist or way too firm.

    This sounds like a dietary problem.  Perhaps you should try being a vegan for awhile. 



  • As a workable test, I tend to make little puppets out of it. If this succeeds, it's good shit.

    Guinness helps.



  • @morbiuswilters said:

    Maybe the cake wasn't stolen, but Professor Plum just had an "understanding" with Colonel Mustard where the Professor would eat cake he found and the Colonel would pay for it.

    Why can't you handle the fact that no matter how much cake the Professor eats, it still costs him the same amount? Whether Colonel Mustard is paying twice as much or not is irrelevant and in no way stealing. Next you'll be suggesting that the federal government pays for the cake. I mean, what is this, Canada, with it's socialist guarantee of day-old shit cake for everyone?



  • @dhromed said:

    As a workable test, I tend to make little puppets out of it. If this succeeds, it's good shit.

    Guinness helps.

    The scary part is that dhromed doesn't realize the rest of us are joking.



  • @bstorer said:

    Why can't you handle the fact that no matter how much cake the Professor eats, it still costs him the same amount? Whether Colonel Mustard is paying twice as much or not is irrelevant and in no way stealing. Next you'll be suggesting that the federal government pays for the cake. I mean, what is this, Canada, with it's socialist guarantee of day-old shit cake for everyone?

    The Canadian system would be better than the anything-goes crap we have now under Fuhrer Bush.  The Big Cake corporations have a stranglehold on the government and are exploiting the working man for more and more shit-cake.  When I take just a little bit of shit-cake for myself you call it stealing but when the Big Cake corporations come in with their bulldozers and their lawyers and their U.S. Marshalls and chase me out of my shack in the middle of the Connecticut woods it's just FINE!  Screw your fascist cake-hoarding policies you bloated, capitalist, Nazi cake-mongerer!



  •  @morbiuswilters said:

    @bstorer said:

    Why can't you handle the fact that no matter how much cake the Professor eats, it still costs him the same amount? Whether Colonel Mustard is paying twice as much or not is irrelevant and in no way stealing. Next you'll be suggesting that the federal government pays for the cake. I mean, what is this, Canada, with it's socialist guarantee of day-old shit cake for everyone?

    The Canadian system would be better than the anything-goes crap we have now under Fuhrer Bush.  The Big Cake corporations have a stranglehold on the government and are exploiting the working man for more and more shit-cake.  When I take just a little bit of shit-cake for myself you call it stealing but when the Big Cake corporations come in with their bulldozers and their lawyers and their U.S. Marshalls and chase me out of my shack in the middle of the Connecticut woods it's just FINE!  Screw your fascist cake-hoarding policies you bloated, capitalist, Nazi cake-mongerer!

     

    Amen...



  • I'm bored so here you go. WTF? or fullsize at http://www.brandonleachphoto.com/wtf.png

    I would have reposted half a dozen posts in keeping with the thread theme.  but I'm sure this conveys the message much better.  And for all the Irish girl fans here, find the hidden url in the image.



  • @galgorah said:

    And for all the Irish girl fans here, find the hidden url in the image.
    I give up.  Is it a magic eye or something?



  • so as not to spoil the surprise for the irish girl fans I'll PM the message to you.



  • @galgorah said:

    so as not to spoil the surprise for the irish girl fans I'll PM the message to you.


    plz pm me teh codez also


    EDIT: found it. Encoding it to avoid spoilers: Li4uLiAtIC0gLi0tLiA6IC8gLyAuLS0gLi0tIC4tLSAuLS4tLi0gLi4tLiAuLSAtLi0uIC4gLS4u
    LiAtLS0gLS0tIC0uLSAuLS4tLi0gLS4tLiAtLS0gLS0gLyAuLS0uIC4gLS0tIC4tLS4gLi0uLiAu
    IC8gLiAuLS4gLi4gLS4tLiAuLSBfIC4uLiAuLi0gLi0uLiAuLS4uIC4uIC4uLi0gLi0gLS4gLyAt
    LS0uLiAuLS0tLSAuLS0tLSAuLS0tLSAuLi4uLiAuLi4tLSA=



  • @galgorah said:

    And for all the Irish girl fans here, find the hidden url in the image.

     I also give up.

     

    Edit: Worked it out from the post above. Morse code ?! Still don't see where it is in the image though



  • @stordoff said:

    [quote user="galgorah"]And for all the Irish girl fans here, find the hidden url in the image.

     I also give up.

     

    Edit: Worked it out from the post above. Morse code ?! Still don't see where it is in the image though

    [/quote]
    again, encoded to avoid spoilers:

    Li4uLi4gLS4uLi4gICAuLi4uLSAtLS4uLiAgIC0uLi4uIC0uLS4gICAtLS4uLiAtLS4uLiAgIC4u
    Li4tIC4uLS4gICAtLi4uLiAtLS0tLiAgIC4uLi4tIC4uLS0tICAgLi4uLi4gLi4uLS0gICAuLi4u
    LiAuLSAgIC4uLi4uIC0tLi4uICAgLi4uLi0gLS4uLi4gICAtLi4uLiAtLi4uICAgLi4uLi0gLS0t
    LS4gICAuLi4uLSAtLS4uLiAgIC4uLi4tIC4tICAgLS4uLi4gLS4tLiAgIC0uLi4uIC4uLi4tICAg
    Li4uLi0gLS0tLi4gICAtLi4uLiAuLi4uLSAgIC0uLi4uIC0uLS4gICAuLi4uLiAuLSAgIC4uLi4u
    IC0tLi4uICAgLi4uLS0gLi4uLi0gICAtLi4uLiAtLS4uLiAgIC0uLi4uIC4uLi4tICAgLi4uLi0g
    LS0uLi4gICAtLi4uLiAtLS0uLiAgIC0uLi4uIC0uLS4gICAuLi4uLSAtLS0tLiAgIC4uLi4tIC0t
    Li4uICAgLS0uLi4gLS0tLi4gICAtLS4uLiAtLS0tLSAgIC0uLi4uIC4uLS0tICAgLS4uLi4gLS4u
    ICAgLi4uLi4gLS4uLi4gICAtLS4uLiAuLSAgIC4uLi4tIC0tLS0uICAgLi4uLi0gLS0uLi4gICAu
    Li4uLSAtLi4uLiAgIC0uLi4uIC0tLS0uICAgLS4uLi4gLi4tLS0gICAuLi4tLSAuLi4tLSAgIC4u
    Li4uIC0uLi4uICAgLi4uLS0gLS0tLS0gICAuLi4uLSAtLS0tLiAgIC4uLi4tIC4uLi4tICAgLi4u
    Li0gLi4uLi4gICAtLS4uLiAtLi4uLiAgIC4uLi4tIC0uLiAgIC0tLi4uIC0tLS0uICAgLi4uLi0g
    Li4tLS0gICAtLS4uLiAtLi4uLiAgIC4uLi4uIC4tICAgLS4uLi4gLS0tLS4gICAuLi4uLSAuLi0t
    LSAgIC4uLi0tIC0tLS0tICAgLS4uLi4gLi0tLS0gICAuLi4uLSAtLS4uLiAgIC4uLi4uIC4uLi4u
    ICAgLS4uLi4gLS0uLi4gICAtLi4uLiAuLi4uLSAgIC4uLi0tIC4uLS0tICAgLi4uLi0gLS4uLi4g
    ICAuLi4tLSAuLi4uLiAgIC4uLi4tIC0tLS0uICAgLi4uLi0gLS0uLi4gICAuLi4uLiAuLi0tLSAg
    IC0tLi4uIC0uLi4uICAgLS4uLi4gLi4uLi0gICAuLi4tLSAuLi0tLSAgIC4uLi0tIC4uLi4tICAg
    LS4uLi4gLS0uLi4gICAtLi4uLiAuLi4uLSAgIC4uLi4tIC0tLi4uICAgLS4uLi4gLS0tLi4gICAt
    Li4uLiAtLi0uICAgLS0tLS0gLi0gICAuLi4uLSAtLS0tLiAgIC4uLi4tIC4uLi0tICAgLi4uLi0g
    Li0gICAuLi4uLiAuLi4uLSAgIC0uLi4uIC4uLS0tICAgLi4uLS0gLi4tLS0gICAuLi4tLSAuLS0t
    LSAgIC0uLi4uIC0uLS4gICAtLi4uLiAuLi4uLSAgIC4uLi4tIC0tLi4uICAgLS4uLi4gLS0tLi4g
    ICAtLS4uLiAtLS0tLSAgIC0uLi4uIC4uLS0tICAgLS4uLi4gLS4uICAgLS4uLi4gLi4uLS0gICAt
    Li4uLiAtLS4uLiAgIC0uLi4uIC4tLS0tICAgLS4uLi4gLiAgIC4uLi4uIC0uLi4uICAgLS0uLi4g
    Li0gICAtLi4uLiAuLi4uLSAgIC4uLi4tIC4uLi0tICAgLi4uLi0gLi4tLS0gICAuLi4tLSAuLi4t
    LSAgIC4uLi4uIC4tICAgLi4uLi4gLS0uLi4gICAuLi4tLSAuLi4uLiAgIC4uLi0tIC0tLS0tICAg
    Li4uLi0gLS0tLS4gICAuLi4uLSAtLS0uLiAgIC0uLi4uIC4uLi4tICAgLS0uLi4gLS0tLS4gICAt
    Li4uLiAuLi0tLSAgIC4uLi0tIC4uLS0tICAgLi4uLS0gLi4uLi4gICAtLi4uLiAuICAgLi4uLi0g
    LS0tLS4gICAtLi4uLiAtLS0tLiAgIC4uLi4tIC4uLS0tICAgLS4uLi4gLS4uLiAgIC0uLi4uIC4t
    LS0tICAgLi4uLi4gLS0uLi4gICAuLi4uLSAtLi4uLiAgIC0tLi4uIC4uLi0tICAgLS4uLi4gLi4t
    LS0gICAuLi4tLSAuLi0tLSAgIC0uLi4uIC4uLi0tICAgLi4uLS0gLS4uICAgCiA=


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to What the Daily WTF? was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.