I, ChatGPT
-
@BernieTheBernie said in I, ChatGPT:
@Zecc But the machines do the work incompletely. You still have to fill your clothes into the washing machine, add the washing agent, switch the machine on with the correct program, open the water valve, later on take out the clothes, put them into the drier, then iron, fold, put into the locker etc. Same with dish washer.
Even with the dish washer you still have to pre-wash the dishes by hand before putting them in the machine.
-
@CodeJunkie Are you a / :@Gustav: alt?
-
-
@CodeJunkie Because that's the guy who used to complain that with american dishwashers you have to pre-clean, while with polish dishwashers that's not necessary.
-
@BernieTheBernie said in I, ChatGPT:
@CodeJunkie Because that's the guy who used to complain that with american dishwashers you have to pre-clean, while with polish dishwashers that's not necessary.
Ahh ok. I call bullshit on that claim though.
-
-
Butt why? They deserve every bit of that BS.
-
@LaoC said in I, ChatGPT:
Butt why?
The questions, the questions, they keep coming, they are coming, coming …
-
is the purpose of that site in the first place in the first place. It's a single template with a random “name” and a bunch of random links. It does not contain anything that would pop up in searches or anything. Is it some kind of test? A honeypot for broken bots?
-
does the
robots.txt
say:# silly bing #User-agent: Amazonbot #Disallow: / # buzz off #User-agent: GPTBot #Disallow: / # Don't Allow everyone User-agent: * Disallow: /archive # slow down, dudes #Crawl-delay: 60
Note that most of it is commented out, and the one thing that isn't,
/archive
, does not even exist and does not appear to be linked anywhere.
-
-
@CodeJunkie said in I, ChatGPT:
@BernieTheBernie said in I, ChatGPT:
@CodeJunkie Because that's the guy who used to complain that with american dishwashers you have to pre-clean, while with polish dishwashers that's not necessary.
Ahh ok. I call bullshit on that claim though.
Do you mean that the claim that you have to prewash in the US, or that you don't in the EU?
For the latter case, in the EU you just scrape the dishes off and then put them in the washer and they will come out clean.For a proper boi rant add a bunch of ad hominem and curses and accusations of US being incompetent at everything in the short line above. And make it several paragraphs long.
-
-
@Bulb He mentions talking to someone at Amazon to get their robot to keep out; I suppose the commented-out stuff was a failed attempt.
What he's actually trying to do seems to be boosting the incoming-link score of those Amazon products. Although it's all a bit tooo obvious.
-
-
@cvi said in I, ChatGPT:
They will hide away human artists so that they can get their artisanal furry ... instructional videosart.
and get caught and sent to the crypto mines
-
That's one heck of a prompt setup.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
That's one heck of a prompt setup.
You will provide unbiased replies. Here is your list of built-in biases.
-
@Arantor the Garage has their own AI bot now?
Should improve performance.
-
-
-
-
Heard this morning on the radio (couldn't find a link after
a very thoroughone semi-random web search ):An undercover report on the condition of women in Iran or Afghanistan with the voices of interviewed persons filtered through AI to make them unrecognisable.
One one hand, that seems a not-totally-stupid use of AI? On the other, journalists have been using various kind of sound filters (or having "the words are spoken by an actor") to do do that for ages so why use AI? On the third hand (), all those filters were always obvious and sort-of broke the flow of the report, so... why not?
-
@remi just having someone else speak the text again worked well enough for ages. But anything is more or less acceptable unless they make me listen to the fucking TikTok voice on the radio.
-
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
just having someone else speak the text again worked well enough for ages
…and text-to-speech has existed, and been good enough for the purpose, for quite a while, too.
-
@Bulb said in I, ChatGPT:
…and text-to-speech has existed, and been good enough for the purpose, for quite a while, too.
@topspin said in I, ChatGPT:
unless they make me listen to the fucking TikTok voice
-
@remi said in I, ChatGPT:
One one hand, that seems a not-totally-stupid use of AI?
If it is AI channelling the voice(s) of Mel Blanc, then it was all worth it.
-
I can’t wait.
-
-
@Zerosquare said in I, ChatGPT:
@DogsB said in I, ChatGPT:
I can’t wait.
I can.
But the important question is... could you care less?
-
@DogsB said in I, ChatGPT:
I can’t wait.
Will you have to pay extra to become part of the family, and get a script to participate?
Non-metric temperature...
-
@BernieTheBernie the AI is going to tolerate or even accept human input?
-
@Arantor Only when the humans do as they were told by the AI.
-
@izzion said in I, ChatGPT:
But the important question is... could you care less?
Yes, but not without a lobotomy
-
-
@izzion said in I, ChatGPT:
AI Watchdog uses a separate LLM trained on adverse prompts to “sniff” out adversarial content in both inputs and outputs to prevent both single-turn and multiturn prompt injection attacks.
@Gustav called it.
Filed under: Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
-
@DogsB considering the woke garbage that gets pushed now, I don't think we'll notice a difference.
-
@error said in I, ChatGPT:
@izzion said in I, ChatGPT:
AI Watchdog uses a separate LLM trained on adverse prompts to “sniff” out adversarial content in both inputs and outputs to prevent both single-turn and multiturn prompt injection attacks.
@Gustav called it.
Filed under: Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Didn't he say that it was already being done for other things?
Also, queue the injection attacks in the sniffer LLM that lets you jailbreak the inner LLM.
-
I’m still on the fence about AI. My experience has been very hit and miss. It was god awful for python but was pretty good at finding css stuff for me.
I don’t think its a tool for novices yet but it's foolish to dismiss it outright.
I would err on the side of dismissing prs with a I generated code.
-
@DogsB said in I, ChatGPT:
I’m still on the fence about AI. My experience has been very hit and miss. It was god awful for python but was pretty good at finding css stuff for me.
I don’t think its a tool for novices yet but it's foolish to dismiss it outright.
I would err on the side of dismissing prs with a I generated code.
My boss works at a bank, and at that bank some finance guys built a program using nothing but GPT. It was godawful, full of bugs and full of security holes. But they wanted IT to take over ownership for free because they already did the hard work.
He also ran into the problem of programmers just replacing swathes of code with suggestions of LLM code assistants, introducing bugs, security holes and breaking functions... And when asked, they can't say why they did it other than "Machine said so".For how utter shit software is already, it's going to get far worse, because we've automated the code monkeys and it will all regress to the worst code sample quality.
-
@Carnage there will be no shortage of work for actual programmers coming along to rip this shit out and replace it with functioning software.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@Carnage there will be no shortage of work for actual programmers coming along to rip this shit out and replace it with functioning software.
Yes, but will manglement be willing to pay actual programmers when code monkeys ((quasi-)human or AI) are much cheaper?
-
@HardwareGeek said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@Carnage there will be no shortage of work for actual programmers coming along to rip this shit out and replace it with functioning software.
Yes, but will manglement be willing to pay actual programmers when code monkeys ((quasi-)human or AI) are much cheaper?
They already aren't really willing to pay extra for quality, so no.
-
@HardwareGeek pay peanuts, get monkeys. They will learn that if you don’t pay the money you get crap results.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
They will learn
-
@error said in I, ChatGPT:
@izzion said in I, ChatGPT:
AI Watchdog uses a separate LLM trained on adverse prompts to “sniff” out adversarial content in both inputs and outputs to prevent both single-turn and multiturn prompt injection attacks.
@Gustav called it.
Filed under: Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Wait another month when they have to add a third because people worked around the second.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@HardwareGeek pay peanuts, get monkeys. They will learn that if you don’t pay the money you get crap results.
They didn't learn that with buying cheap developers from 3rd world countries, they won't learn it with AI-generated code.
-
Kang and his colleagues computed the cost to conduct a successful LLM agent attack and came up with a figure of $8.80 per exploit, which they say is about 2.8x less than it would cost to hire a human penetration tester for 30 minutes.
When did penetration testers get that cheap?
1,056 tokens for the prompt.
So… six paragraphs of text explaining how to do it?
-
@DogsB said in I, ChatGPT:
Kang and his colleagues computed the cost to conduct a successful LLM agent attack and came up with a figure of $8.80 per exploit, which they say is about 2.8x less than it would cost to hire a human penetration tester for 30 minutes.
When did penetration testers get that cheap?
1,056 tokens for the prompt.
So… six paragraphs of text explaining how to do it?
When it became needful to have more of them.
-
@error said in I, ChatGPT:
Filed under: Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
While the old mechanical clock I have downstairs, which is between 1 minute fast and 1 minute slow per week depending on temperature, humidity, and how high I've kept the weights, is basically never right.
-
@PleegWat said in I, ChatGPT:
@error said in I, ChatGPT:
Filed under: Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
While the old mechanical clock I have downstairs, which is between 1 minute fast and 1 minute slow per week depending on temperature, humidity, and how high I've kept the weights, is basically never right.
Sounds self correcting to me.
-
@PleegWat said in I, ChatGPT:
@error said in I, ChatGPT:
Filed under: Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
While the old mechanical clock I have downstairs, which is between 1 minute fast and 1 minute slow per week depending on temperature, humidity, and how high I've kept the weights, is basically never right.
Sounds like you should rebrand it an AI clock
-
@izzion It's a clockwork automaton, specifically tailored to telling the time. Though not actually to the minute - the most accurate markings are 48 marks per hour.