Emoji testing
-
They're all like this. It looks fairly decent until you go to post and it's like they just forgot about it.
-
@loopback0 That was one of the things I updated:
-
@hungrier Yeah that's how it should be.
-
@loopback0 I also did unread notifications and a bunch of other stuff, over time
-
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
@loopback0 That was one of the things I updated:
When I would go to the dark side, that is
-
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
@Zecc I like them, especially the first one. The second one is probably a better representation of "excellent" but the glowing outline is kind of nasty
I did a er job than usual. I didn't notice I had feathering turned on () when I selected the background to delete.
I've started again, from a higher resolution starting image.
Not going to lie, I'm struggling to OCD the white pixels out. I've even dropped to manual painting, which is usually
This one's actually the first one, for reference. Notice any improvement?
-
@Zecc For some of the ones I've done, I manually traced the outlines with black. It's not so bad
-
What if we just lifted SA emotes?
-
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
What if we just lifted SA emotes?
-
D'oh!
-
@hungrier Or a smaller cropped version:
-
Lets try this one again:
-
We can now upload SVG?
-
-
...
-
-
Anyway, here I've got the final (?) version of
:doing_it_right:
:
-
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
Anyway, here I've got the final (?) version of
:doing_it_right:
:I feel like it should be a cross of with
Filed under: Maybe just
-
I've made this but I suspect the fine detail will be invisible:
-
Editing transparency around hair is hard.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Emoji testing:
But it may not come up...
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
Apparently not
Only now have I understood what you were talking about, because:
But if I open in a new tab the file is actually a PNG. Goddammit, NodeBB!
Here it is again:
-
@hungrier I tried tracing the line art at small scale to see if it would show up any better:
-
The doctor said I wouldn't have so many nosebleeds if I kept my finger outta there
e: Smaller image, smaller filesize, shouldn't make any difference in emote visibility:
-
Dunno if anyone knows who these two are, or would recognize them:
I just wanted to try out a new technique
-
Here are a couple of 8-bit hearts I did and forgot about:
-
Won't somebody please think of the children?!
-
@kazitor said in Emoji testing:
@Zecc said in Emoji testing:
Probably easier to vectorize the logo
Beat you to it, about four months ago
FFS, that's a PNG. NodeBB!!!!!
-
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd"><svg width="100%" height="100%" viewBox="0 0 200 200" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:space="preserve" style="fill-rule:evenodd;clip-rule:evenodd;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:2;"><path d="M100,0c55.192,0 100,44.808 100,100c0,55.192 -44.808,100 -100,100c-55.192,0 -100,-44.808 -100,-100c0,-55.192 44.808,-100 100,-100Zm0,11.142c49.042,0 88.858,39.816 88.858,88.858c0,49.042 -39.816,88.858 -88.858,88.858c-49.042,0 -88.858,-39.816 -88.858,-88.858c0,-49.042 39.816,-88.858 88.858,-88.858Z" style="fill:#c1113c;"/><path d="M118.485,116.735c-8.312,10.652 -21.268,17.505 -35.812,17.505c-25.058,0 -45.401,-20.343 -45.401,-45.401c0,-25.057 20.343,-45.401 45.401,-45.401c22.129,0 40.582,15.867 44.593,36.836l56.074,0c1.669,4.248 2.585,8.873 2.585,13.711c0,20.73 -16.83,37.56 -37.56,37.56c-12.181,0 -23.016,-5.811 -29.88,-14.81Zm-35.812,-63.445c19.62,0 35.549,15.929 35.549,35.549c0,19.62 -15.929,35.549 -35.549,35.549c-19.62,0 -35.549,-15.929 -35.549,-35.549c0,-19.62 15.929,-35.549 35.549,-35.549Zm45.371,37.204c-0.22,6.145 -1.665,11.981 -4.097,17.271c4.816,8.509 13.951,14.257 24.418,14.257c15.474,0 28.037,-12.563 28.037,-28.037c0,-1.182 -0.074,-2.347 -0.216,-3.491l-48.142,0Z" style="fill:#c1113c;"/><circle cx="100" cy="98.835" r="8.341" style="fill:#c1113c;"/><circle cx="140.024" cy="103.556" r="8.341" style="fill:#c1113c;"/><path d="M131.093,155.536c5.929,-2.547 12.206,-1.208 14.008,2.987c1.801,4.195 -1.55,9.668 -7.48,12.214c-5.929,2.547 -12.206,1.209 -14.007,-2.986c-1.802,-4.195 1.549,-9.669 7.479,-12.215Z" style="fill:#c1113c;"/><path d="M65.02,32.78c23.431,-16.835 59.198,-0.735 62.948,27.991c-15.274,-19.058 -35.511,-30.831 -62.948,-27.991Z" style="fill:#c1113c;"/><path d="M130.625,68.31c14.683,3.813 27.367,-0.617 36.626,-10.74c-3.091,17.138 -23.167,23.83 -36.626,10.74Z" style="fill:#c1113c;"/></svg>
-
@Zecc said in Emoji testing:
If I knew was going to be added I would have invested a little more effort in making the eyes better.
The way they are now looks a bit off in emoji size, I think.
,
,
,
...
I think I'm just making it worse. Probably easier to vectorize the logo and edit that.
To be done.I like to think it's not worse.
-
Inspired by another topic:
-
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
Inspired by another topic:
Mmmm....
pdohnuts....Fake edit: No, autocorrect, that's NOT what I meant!
-
A pair of Jeffs: and
-
-
-
@boomzilla said in Emoji testing:
@dcon said in Emoji testing:
snickering
Is that what the kids are calling it these days?
"You're not yourself when you're hungry.... "
"Here, have a Snickers!"
-
@error said in how can this virus be declining on SK?:
@hungrier said in how can this virus be declining on SK?:
@error I've heard there are two strains of the virus, one mild and one severe. But if that's true or not
Custom emoji thread is
@Zecc said in how can this virus be declining on SK?:
I'll go look for it.
Well, that took a lot more scrolling than I thought, but here's the post where I used it:
https://what.thedailywtf.com/post/1636755
This is the image:
This is the image at emoji size: I guess it works?
Here's what @error posted at emoji size:
Pick your favorite.
-
This post is deleted!
-
Wow!
-
What's with the double boomzilla?
Looks like there's an @âerror in the April 1st Boomzillifier.
-
@Zecc
It has an error in it ...
-
@Zecc said in Emoji testing:
Looks like there's an @âerror in the April 1st Boomzillifier.
Yeah, pretty sure it was there last year too. Obs no development was spent fixing
bugserrors.
-
-
How come we don't have this dude yet?
-
Lets see if a 2x version of
:tinfoil-hat:
is better or worse:e: Just my luck, they got separated by word wrap on my phone
-
@hungrier Lets see if a 2x version is actually better than my redrawn version :
-
@hungrier Why does it look so awful in Firefox on Linux?
-
@hungrier Let's get crazy:
e: Linux whyyyyy
-
It actually looks better at 110% zoom, aside from a couple fat pixels. Who designed this fucking browser?
-
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
@hungrier Why does it look so awful in Firefox on Linux?
Firefox on Mac.
-
@loopback0 That's the way it should look, which makes sense since it's a high DPI screen so the pixels are 1:1. But for some reason Firefox on Linux is applying extreme blur an image displayed at half size.