The Official Woody Woodpecker Thread
-
You're still dodging the question
Is the question "So how is libelously calling someone a murderer OK?"
-
No.
-
Porn is a documentary record of sexual activity
Really? Was "The Blair Witch" also a documentary? Was "The Office"? Are all movies and TV a
documentary record
Because while those events may have occurred as they were filmed, no one would categorize them as "documentaries".
And just so that we can all work off of the same definition and you can't just go making shit up like you usually do so that it suits your argument:
The relevant bit is definition #2:
Movies, Television. based on or re-creating an actual event, era, life story, etc., that purports to be factually accurate and contains no fictional elements:
a documentary life of Gandhi.
I think you may be the only person who would say that porn is:
a documentary record of sexual activity
The vast bulk of it involves no "movie magic".
So fucking what? Neither do most indie films, but they are mostly all fiction all the same.
-
-
-
If you prefer "reliable" or "accurate" to "documentary", I'm fine with that. Doesn't change what I meant, which is that when you see a closeup of somebody's penis penetrating somebody else's anus in a porn video, the overwhelming likelihood is that this effect was achieved by means of having two people do exactly that in front of a camera.
-
You are using some separate language from the rest of society, and it makes it very hard to communicate with you.
-
penis
anus
You are using some separate language from the rest of society, and it makes it very hard to communicate with you.
... huh? So then what do you call them?
-
You know what I meant, you retarded fucking Canadian.
-
You know what I meant
Often, no. You are using some separate language from the rest of society, and it makes it very hard to communicate with you.
-
I meant that no person who is not an idiot looks at hardcore porn and thinks that is really how the majority of sex occurs, and you would know this is you were not such a SJW idiot and used language the same way as the rest of society.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
... huh? So then what do you call them?
The former:
- Tube steak
- Meatpole
- Pork sword
- One-eyed monster
- Trouser snake
- Pecker
- Purple-headed yogurt slinger
- Schlong
- Rape culture
The latter:
- Cornhole
- Hershey Highway
- Dump truck
- Brown Trout Hatchery
- Pickle Bin
- Tijuana Soft Serve Dispenser (thanks morbs!)
-
-
Yes.
-
-
First I need to consult the Idiot Fox for a list of acceptable words that I can use to make my joke with. I will get back to you in 2-4 weeks.
-
First I need to consult the Idiot Fox for a list of acceptable words that I can use to make my joke with. I will get back to you in 2-4 weeks.
Don't forget to fill out the forms in triplicate.
-
God.
Damn.
It.
Now I have to start over.
-
God.
Damn.
It.
Now I have to start over.
Just claim you identify the papers as complete and in triplicate, and that his narrowminded insistence on calling them "blank" is phobic, and he condones postoffice shootings.
-
no person who is not an idiot looks at hardcore porn and thinks that is really how the majority of sex occurs
The claim at issue was that anal sex is homosexual encounter. A single disconfirming instance would be enough to refute that claim. The countless heterosexual anal encounters and homosexual non-anal encounters documented in the form of online porn are enough to reduce it to shreds. The question of whether or not such online porn is fairly representative of non-porn sex is a red herring.
-
@flabdablet said:
Porn is a documentary record of sexual activity
Really? Was "The Blair Witch" also a documentary? Was "The Office"? Are all movies and TV a
documentary record
Because while those events may have occurred as they were filmed, no one would categorize them as "documentaries".
And just so that we can all work off of the same definition and you can't just go making shit up like you usually do so that it suits your argument:
The relevant bit is definition #2:
You need to read up on the difference between adjectives and nouns before you start waving the Wikipedia article on amphibians under someone's nose who has just pointed out that the LVTP-7 is an amphibian vehicle. It looks stupid when you're so desperately grabbing for straws to be a pedant about that you grab a full hand of cowpat instead.
-
LVTP-7 is an amphibian vehicle.
Amphibious. In English, we say it is amphibious.
I don't reject what he said. I reject the way he trashed the English language to get there.
-
@LaoC said:
You should tell that to the people using it.LVTP-7 is an amphibian vehicle.
Amphibious. In English, we say it is amphibious.
I don't reject what he said. I reject the way he trashed the English language to get there.
That you don't know a word doesn't mean it's wrong.
-
That you don't know a word doesn't mean it's wrong.
That he used the wrong word does mean that it is wrong. Dipshit.
-
And you should tell it to Wikipedia, who use the more correct word.
-
@LaoC said:
That you don't know a word doesn't mean it's wrong.
That he used the wrong word does mean that it is wrong. Dipshit.
You're trying to prove an adjective was wrong by demonstrating that the noun sharing its surface means something else. This is bound to fail, but of course you'd have to know the difference between the two to understand that.
-
He used it as a known, as best I can tell...
-
And you should tell it to Wikipedia, who use the more correct word.
I trust Wikipedia to use the more common word, but as pretty much all military sources don't, I trust them to use the manufacturer's name.
-
He used it as a known, as best I can tell...
In English, we say "noun". In your dialect it may sound similar to "known" but that's neither US nor British standard.
And no, "record" is the noun, "documentary" is the adjective. Do read up on it, it helps.
-
It is used by U.S. Marine Corps Assault Amphibian Battalions
I didn't know the US Marine Corps had battalions of killer frogs. TIL.
-
I reject the way he trashed the English language to get there.
Where is the amphiguity? It's over there, in a box. Shunt is saying the 8:15 from Gillingham when in reality he means the 8:13 from Gillingham. The train is the same only the time is altered. Ecce homo, ergo elk. La Fontaine knew his sister and knew her bloody well. The point is taken, the beast is moulting, the fluff gets up your nose. The illusion is complete; it is reality, the reality is illusion and the ambiguity is the only truth. But is the truth, as Hitchcock observes, in the box? No there isn't room, the ambiguity has put on weight. The point is taken, the elk is dead, the beast stops at Swindon, Chabrol stops at nothing, I'm having treatment and La Fontaine can get knotted.
-
If you want to be bi-curious, you're more than welcome. We won't judge you. But we will judge you if you shame us for not having those kinks.
Who said anything about being bi-curious?
-
Who said anything about being bi-curious?
If you can define a righteous position that allows one to be heterosexual, not homophobic, not bi-curious, and in compliance with the above assertion that being repulsed by the idea of participating in homosexual sex implies homophobia, I'm all ears.
-
It's a mixture of maturity and being totally comfortable with one's sexuality. Obviously you haven't mastered one or the other of those yet.
-
penetration of a female anus by a male penis.
You got me again, should've been more specific. I meant male anus penetration.
Approximately half of the straight porn available online features penetration of a female anus by a male penis.
I believe you are lying, mister, but it's not important enough for me to waste my time to prove it.
-
It's a mixture of maturity and being totally comfortable with one's sexuality. Obviously you haven't mastered one or the other of those yet.
If maturity and/or being comfortable with my sexuality entails that I have to be okay with the prospect of being the guy on top on meatspin.com, then I guess I'll just have to settle for being forever immature and/or uncomfortable with my sexuality.
-
we should start a flamewar about those!
http://hydra-media.cursecdn.com/dota2.gamepedia.com/4/43/Silencer.png
-
should've been more specific. I meant male anus penetration.
Then don't google "pegging", lest your tiny mind be completely blown.
-
A single disconfirming instance would be enough to refute that claim.
Of course it would, even half would suffice, heck! even one fourth would be ok.
To be honest, I'm not sure what it is that is discussed here
anymorestill.
-
You're still here, man, when do you sleep? You really have nothing better to do?
-
Then don't google "pegging", lest your tiny mind be completely blown.
Not my cup of tea, but that's vanilla compared to a lot of what's out there.
-
It's all about your fear of being penetrated, isn't it? Fear of someone else shoving something up your bumhole. Thing is, though, prostate exams and incarcertion with a big man called "Bubba" excluded, there is no particular prospect of someone shoving something up your bumhole without your explicit consent. Hordes of gay men are not prowling your area looking to give your arse a forcible "converting". There's no need for fear or repulsion, because it's not going to happen unless you explicitly want it to.
I would guess that your "order of preference" goes something like this:
- having sex with a woman
- having anal sex with a woman
- having anal sex with a man where you are doing the penetrating
- having anal sex with a man where the other man is doing the penetrating
That's perfectly normal, and where you draw the "do not want" line differs. Where it ventures into homophobia, though, is where you start using words like "repulsed", "terrified" or "disgusted".
It's perhaps worth noting that there are several societies where you're only considered homosexual if you are doing the 4th item above.
-
@Lorne_Kates said:
... huh? So then what do you call them?
pinji and ganxo
FUN WITH LOJBAN
- That is a fucking dog.
- ta mabla gerku
- That is a fucking dog.
- ta gletu gerku
- That dog is fucking.
- lo gerku no'u ta ca gletu
- That is a fucking dog.
-
Filed under : The best thing about having sex with a 3 year old girl is that you can turn them over and pretend you're having sex with a 3 year old boy
Trigger warning! We have special snowflakes around!
-
-
Awww, come on. I came here in good faith, with some nice little trolling in mind. Then I got sucked into the vortex of discussion whether large majority of people should undergo psychiatric treatment and now we're what? Talking 'bout pegging, anuses and other fucking disgusting internet porn, probably that I can't even imagine, because I'm such a psycho homophobic prude, that would be disgusted at the prospect of being at the giving or receiving, or giving and receiving, or giving then receiving then again giving, end of homosexual intercourse. (Oh, and that receiving thing is still disgusting even if it's a heterosexual intercourse.)
Yeah, you just made my day.
-
Thing is, though, prostate exams and incarcertion with a big man called "Bubba" excluded, there is no particular prospect of someone shoving something up your bumhole without your explicit consent.
Prostate exams generally do require consent.
Also, if unauthorized anal penetration is what you actually fear, then you're better off avoiding contact with New Mexico police than contact with people you think of as gay men.
-
than contact with people you think of as gay men.
Why do you keep making those stupid exaggerated claims? I've no problems with gay men. I don't see their sexuality as a defining characteristic, it doesn't effect my liking or disliking them.
To be honest, I start thinking that in fact it's you who has a problem.
Especially, if you see no problem with doing your first cousin Rob, or your brother Jim.
Yup, now it was I who exaggerated. Finally, yeah!
-
Prostate exams generally do require consent.
ā¦ of the "you wouldn't be here if you weren't OK with it" kind.
-
It's all about your fear of being penetrated, isn't it? Fear of someone else shoving something up your bumhole.
Maybe! It is perhaps the canonical emasculating experience, with the exception of actual emasculation.
Thing is, though, prostate exams and incarcertion with a big man called "Bubba" excluded, there is no particular prospect of someone shoving something up your bumhole without your explicit consent.
Okay, so we've reduced it to unlikely, but we have not reduced the probability to zero.
Hordes of gay men are not prowling your area looking to give your arse a forcible "converting".
I dunno, I have been groped before. Must be because I was asking for it!
There's no need for fear or repulsion, because it's not going to happen unless you explicitly want it to.
See above. Also, the problem with fear and anxiety is that they are not necessarily subject to rationality.
For example, the average speed of traffic on many of the highways on which I commute is about 20MPH over the posted speed limit, which is also the threshold for reckless endangerment. Now, while it would be arguably hazardous to drive at the posted speed limit given the flow of traffic, and I see cops generally ignore traffic driving at that speed (or faster), it's still technically possible for a cop to flash his lights, put me in jail for a while, make me lose my job and have a criminal record so that getting another job in the industry becomes extremely difficult.
I could also go into examples about false rape accusations, Donglegate, walking on eggshells, etc. but any of those topics would spawn a flamewar that I think we've already had too recently, and I hope those examples will give you an idea of where I'm going with this.
I would guess that your "order of preference" goes something like this:
Fair enough, though there are only so many ways that four items can be arranged in a list.
That's perfectly normal, and where you draw the "do not want" line differs. Where it ventures into homophobia, though, is where you start using words like "repulsed", "terrified" or "disgusted".
Always down to word choices.
It's perhaps worth noting that there are several societies where you're only considered homosexual if you are doing the 4th item above.
Observation: Based on what I've gleaned from various dating sites, a nonzero amount of single ladies consider bisexual males to be equivalent to homosexual males with explanations like "I don't want your dick after where it's been," or "If you like men, you are gay, plain and simple." You might reasonably label such behavior as biphobia.