The Backup Likes Thread - Just for @HardwareGeek and @Luhmann, now with extra 😽🐈
-
Upon further review, the ambiguity is intentional as I could be replying to @asdf or @abarker. Or both.
-
Upon further review, the ambiguity is intentional as I could be replying to @asdf or @abarker. Or both.
I shall now be awake for the next five hours. Of course, that was my plan anyway.
-
Haha! I have succeeded.
I'm not totally sure what I succeeded in doing, but I certainly succeeded in it!
-
I'm pretty sure you just pissed off Blakey and started a flamewar ... Somehow
-
Woops.
-
I'm pretty sure you just pissed off Blakey and started a flamewar ... Somehow
It probably involved some sort of causal nexus.
-
Good evening, folks!
-
Hi @rc4
-
Hello sloosecannon!
Question: is it "sloose cannon" or "ess loose cannon"?
-
-
Ah. Thanks for the clarification!
-
-
Damn right! Dirty Hacker!
-
You're screwed!
-
-
from all who threaten her life and sovereignty
so we can still mess with her mental well being? Great!
-
-
-
-
-
-
++
-
Yeah. That's like the baseline for blakey.
The challenge would be to make him not pissed off.
-
That's different...
-
To be honest ... I don't want to mess with that either ... it sounds rather icky
-
-
That's the challenge.
-
No, that would be considered an attack on her sovereignty.
-
-
swypo. that was on mobile.
-
There's something irresistible about the Like button on a post that already has 9 Likes.
-
I knew what it was. I still needed to point it out. Because raisins.
-
I knew what it was. I still needed to point it out. Because raisins.
just had to reaffirm that i still hold my title as sultanatrix of swyops?
-
+ Nice Post
-
Aye.
-
Ah. Just like the good ol days. 22 badger notifications.
-
-
@accalia said:
from all who threaten her life and sovereignty
so we can still mess with her mental well being? Great!
Fun!
-
-
-
Yeah. That's like the baseline for blakey.
The challenge would be to make him not pissed off.:nod.co:
-
@loopback0 said:
to make him not pissed off
You mean that that state exists?Hypothetically.
-
No, that would be considered an attack on her sovereignty.
How would an attack on one's mental state be an attack on their sovereignty?
-
I damn well have rights to like this post! Fuck off Discourse!
-
-
@Luhmann said:
@loopback0 said:
to make him not pissed off
You mean that that state exists?Hypothetically.
That was what I was implying ... I never seen that in the wild.
-
@accalia said:
No, that would be considered an attack on her sovereignty.
How would an attack on one's mental state be an attack on their sovereignty?
It is because i said it is.
-
@abarker said:
@accalia said:
No, that would be considered an attack on her sovereignty.
How would an attack on one's mental state be an attack on their sovereignty?
It is because i said it is.
Nah-nah-nah-na
-
-