The Official Funny Stuff Thread™
-
@Luhmann said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
I have enough printed training material to go round.
To use instead of the three sea shells?
-
@loopback0 said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Luhmann said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
I have enough printed training material to go round.
To use instead of the three sea shells?
He doesn't know how to use the three sea shells
-
@Applied-Mediocrity said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@loopback0 said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Luhmann said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
I have enough printed training material to go round.
To use instead of the three sea shells?
He doesn't know how to use the three sea shells
I have modified the three seashells. Pray I do not modify them further!
-
@loopback0 said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Luhmann said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
I have enough printed training material to go round.
To use instead of the three sea shells?
Which sorts of sea shells? Conches? Razor clams? Oysters?
-
@dkf said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@loopback0 said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Luhmann said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
I have enough printed training material to go round.
To use instead of the three sea shells?
Which sorts of sea shells? Conches? Razor clams? Oysters?
Wentletraps.
-
I like rice.
Rice is great when you're hungry and want 3,000 of something.
-
-
My father says "You don't always get what you pay for."
Wonderful man. Terrible delivery driver.
-
-
@Gern_Blaanston Amazingly, I knew most of the other ones in that video. But this one got me:
I sent my hearing aids for repair three weeks ago. I haven't heard anything since.
-
I need to find a collection of Tim Vine material, clearly.
-
@Arantor Have you tried the internet?
Tim Vine is one of those names I wouldn't be able to remember but which I instantly recognize.
-
-
@Zecc I haven’t yet, it’s more a note to myself to do when I’m not in a meeting at work. Powerful vibes though.
Vine is a regular at the Edinburgh Fringe and has won their “funniest joke” award multiple times.
-
@Zecc said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Gern_Blaanston Amazingly, I knew most of the other ones in that video.
Because they were in the other don't laugh challenge video linked around here maybe a couple weeks ago.
-
-
-
-
@Carnage said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@BernieTheBernie said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Carnage said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
Or maybe not, because apart from the good looking women
@Carnage said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
there will be fat old men there as well.
And what happened to the fat old women? Are swedish saunas really different from german saunas / nudist beaches?Well, there are fat old women too, but they are generally not nude. And surprisingly not very common in saunas.
Duh saunas are hot and sweaty and make you lose weight.
-
@dangeRuss said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Carnage said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@BernieTheBernie said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Carnage said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
Or maybe not, because apart from the good looking women
@Carnage said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
there will be fat old men there as well.
And what happened to the fat old women? Are swedish saunas really different from german saunas / nudist beaches?Well, there are fat old women too, but they are generally not nude. And surprisingly not very common in saunas.
Duh saunas are hot and sweaty and make you lose weight.
Unfortunately, it's a very short-term water-weight loss.
-
Seen at our office:
-
@Vault_Dweller Flutter? Warum, like, kurwa, asugerechnet Flutter?
-
@Bulb Flutter was the new hotness like 5 years ago and it has slowly but surely died a slow painful demise. The only question is when it will join its brethren in the Google Graveyard.
-
@Arantor I'm not sure how hot it even was. To me learning yet another programming language that only has that one UI framework to its name never sounded like a particularly appealing proposition.
… colleague did choose to do some UI (for a hobby project, not work) in it and … recently said he doesn't like the way you have to override methods from the framework classes all over the place—basically it sounded like a design from the early days of OOP when inheritance was still cool, before people stared realizing inheritance-heavy code isn't actually readable (can't confirm myself, dart is one language I really don't want to spend any time even learning about).
-
@Bulb and yet Dart only dates to 2011, in the wake of Go it was trying to be Google’s JS killer in the same way Go was their attempt to shake up the server backend landscape.
-
@Bulb said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
To me learning yet another programming language that only has that one UI framework to its name never sounded like a particularly appealing proposition.
On the other hand, WPF is so good it's totally worth learning C# and XAML.
-
@Gustav said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
On the other hand, WPF is so good it's totally worth learning C# and XAML.
Nothing is worth learning XAML.
-
@MrL Nah. XAML is, unironically, great.
-
@GOG said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@MrL Nah. XAML is, unironically, great.
At being unreadable, extremely verbal mess, with no usable editors? That is something, I guess.
-
@Arantor said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Bulb and yet Dart only dates to 2011, in the wake of Go it was trying to be Google’s JS killer in the same way Go was their attempt to shake up the server backend landscape.
Go at least has Some™ new ideas in it. Though when I first look at it and found that 1. structs are value objects, but arrays are reference objects and 2. hash tables are built into the language with proper type parametrization, but any other datatype implemented in a library is restricted to dynamic polymorphism¹, I concluded that this isn't going to be my next choice of language. Plus, of course, it has the dubious honour of giving name to the Go Statement Considered Harmful essay.
But as for Dart, I never heard of any new feature it has that could make it better than C# or Java or even JavaScript (JavaScript has a lot of quirks, but it is simple, and that's a virtue in programming languages).
-
@Gustav said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Bulb said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
To me learning yet another programming language that only has that one UI framework to its name never sounded like a particularly appealing proposition.
On the other hand, WPF is so good it's totally worth learning C# and XAML.
WPF is not worth learning anything, but C# itself does have enough good frameworks for it to make it worth learning.
-
@MrL said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
with no usable editors
What's wrong with Visual Studio?
-
fightfightfightfight
-
@Bulb said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@Vault_Dweller Flutter? Warum, like, kurwa, asugerechnet Flutter?
It comes up when you search (I don't remember the specific keywords) what's currently used for portable GUI apps, and there's shiny looking example screenshots. At least that's how I arrived glancing at it some time ago, before I saw "Eww, Google" and then "Ewwwwwww, Dart".
-
Having done a ton of XAML in my life, it is not great. It does work and you can do some really cool stuff with it, but it is a PITA at every turn to do anything even remotely complex with it.
-
@GOG said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@MrL said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
with no usable editors
What's wrong with Visual Studio?
In general - a metric fuckton of things. But in context of XAML...
- inellisense not working for half of things, because it's xaml
- intellisense not working for other things, because it crashed
- analysers/compilers not signaling problems, because it's xaml
- analysers/compilers deciding that everything is a problem and staying in this state for an hour
- analysers/compilers unloading core libraries, because fuck you, and claiming basic keywords don't exits as a result
- preview pane not able to show anything more complex than a rectangle, because it's xaml
- preview pane showing the same view for 15 minutes, not noticing changes to markup
- preview pane showing nothing because it doesn't like a single line of markupand of course
- editor locking xaml/baml/whatever files and preventing project compilationThat's just from top of my head. Top experience. Highly recomended.
-
@MrL YMMV
-
@Bulb said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
he doesn't like the way you have to override methods from the framework classes all over the place—basically it sounded like a design from the early days of OOP when inheritance was still cool
Ugh.
I'm using Qt, which I generally like, but I hate whenever I'm looking up how to do something and the answer is "make a derived class and override foobar". Fuuuuck.
-
@Dragoon said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
PITA at every turn to do anything even remotely complex with it.
That's kinda the point, isn't it? It's supposed to be a programmatic slideshow.
But just like JavaScript, people want to fuck it into something it never wanted to be...
-
@GOG said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@MrL YMMV
Idk, that seems to be my experience as well.
-
-
@MrL said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@GOG said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
@MrL Nah. XAML is, unironically, great.
At being unreadable, extremely verbal mess, with no usable editors? That is something, I guess.
And debugging. You forgot debugging.
-
@Bulb said in The Official Funny Stuff Thread™:
JavaScript has a lot of quirks, but it is simple
You were saying?
-
-
-
-
-
@dcon I like the even shorter version where Luke goes in to Toshi to pick up some power converters.
-
-