How Dark Is Your Personality?
-
My result:
-
Seems legit.
-
-
I also had to look up Machiavellianism.
-
Taken as Mafia!Yami:
Actual me:
-
I assume that most of us are going to show up this way, then. Except Fox, who, if he answers honestly, will max out the last two bars.
-
My screenshot refuses to upload (!) But i got Infrequently Vile
-
Chose the meanest answer for each question:
-
Of course you did...
-
I lik how you are off the chart on psychopathy...
-
I lik how you are
pls no
-
Tried to invert ben's attempt, but ended up staying on the chart:
Loading 100%, it says. It's said it for over a minute. Maybe I can eventually post?
Apparently despite the "NO U DONT" cursor and disabled button style, you can still post
-
-
-
-
It's easy to be humble and not claim you're a rockstar programmer if you can rely on other people to do it instead.
-
I had to look up Don Draper.
I guess it's from some TV show I've never watched.
-
Your mafia character got the same scores as real Captain.
How do I pay mafia? Is it too late to join?
-
Mafia 2 is over. A mafia 3 may materialize in time.
-
Nobody was surprised by this, right?
-
What, that when someone specifically says they're answering as badly as possible, they get a funny answer?
-
And the mobile version is totally amenable to getting the whole result in one screenshot...
The 'important bit'.
-
What, that when someone specifically says they're answering as badly as possible, they get a funny answer?
I assume for the purpose of this joke that in Ben's case saying he was answering as badly as possible was redundant and that his answers, then were what he actually would say.
-
Let's see if it'll upload now...
Nope!
*retakes on laptop, tries to upload from there*
Success!
-
Who would have guessed that your most notable trait would be narcissism, and that your ability to convince people to do things is only as high as your psychopathy?
-
Who would have guessed that your most notable trait
on this very short list of traits would be narcissism, and that your ability to convince people to do things is only as high as your psychopathy?FTFY, and *gasp* I certainly wouldn't have been able to guess that.
-
-
I assume, though, that the reason that it isn't higher is that you gave a neutral answer to 'I get embarrassed when I'm complimented'. I imagine that you'd say you don't, if I could believe you had any experience to draw from when answering that one.
-
'I get embarrassed when I'm complimented'
Actually, that one I gave a double plus to, because I do get embarrassed and feel extremely awkward almost every time I'm given a compliment.
-
Thought I'll get less on narcissism, but get psychopathy off the chart. Apparently I'm both a more nice and vain guy than I thought...
-
Unsurprising, I am strong in the lolly-trolley.
-
I tried to answer honestly:
I am glad to know I am not a psychopath, but it seems I have let things go to my head.
-
This rating -- high in Machiavellianism and relatively low in the others -- is clearly the best. That's not narcissism, just cold hard fact.
Now back to hiding my scheming and strengths.
-
Mine with exactly the same result there.
-
I think I did it wrong.
-
No wonder I'm such a belgiuming asshole:
EDIT: I answered these honestly. Scrolling up makes me slightly nervous. (not that I should lend much credence to an online quiz, but...)
-
The Villain in glasses are we?
-
I answered that I don't do everything for my own benefit and it counted against me.
I don't agree.
Manipulating others for the benefit of everyone is just as vile.
-
I feel like their overall rating isn't fine-grained enough. With only, what, 4 different values?
-
I think it says something that the majority of us are rating high on mach.
-
Is it possible that his narcissism is so high that it overflowed the value (in other words, his narcissism anticipates itself and answers otherwise). Self-aware narcissism. Maybe his narcissism has its own personality?
-
It's too subjective in that questions. Do you feel guilty if you screw with someone? Would you kill someone for 10000 USD if you knew for sure nobody would ever know about it?
Edit: I'll make sure I never start my system in runlevel 4 from now on
-
Those questions aren't doing me much good, I'm afraid. Although the first one is a tad broad.
-
I answered that I don't do everything for my own benefit and it counted against me.
That's your low psychopathy. A true psychopath would rarely consider doing something for someone else because what's in it for them? Why bother? They lack empathy altogether.
-
Manipulating others for the benefit of everyone is just as vile.
Actually, it's worse. If you're doing it for your own benefit you'll (in theory) stop when you get what you want.
-
Manipulating others for the benefit of everyone is just as vile.
How is it bad if everyone is better off in the long run?
-
How is it bad if everyone is better off in the long run?
Try this version:
Manipulating others for what you think is the benefit of everyone is just as vile.
-
That's really no different because either
A) Nobody agrees on the definition of "what will benefit everyone," so it isn't different
B) There is some widely-accepted definition of "something that benefits everyone," and if you manipulate people to achieve that result, the ends justify the means and it isn't vileIf B, then what you meant to say was "Manipulating people to do things I don't agree with but you think are good things is vile." And that's just silly.
-
Then you should move to sales, or become a CEO
-
Manipulating others for what you think is the benefit of everyone is just as vile.
That's one way of showing it's vile.
Another way is that it removes faculty/free-will from others.
Even if they all like the outcome, they have that faculty taken away.
A lot of people, in a lot of cultures, think they like the outcome because they don't know anything else... I spent quite a bit of the other day arguing this point to them. Waste of time, but that's how I figured it out.
There is some widely-accepted definition of "something that benefits everyone," and if you manipulate people to achieve that result, the ends justify the means and it isn't vile
What if it's at the cost of the just outcome?