Your brain is tiny but apparently people on this forum are now baby wimps who are afraid of scary words oh noes!!!


  • ♿ (Parody)

    You know who else is awful at drawing? Me! Oh shit...


  • Banned

    @tar said:

    Oh god, that's like the cranial capacity of the freaking elephant man.

    Fun fact: elephants are quite good at abstract thinking, compared to most other animals.



  • @blakeyrat said:

    therefore fantasy, therefore no cyborgs.

    Why can't there be cyborgs in fantasy?



  • Also, Shadowrun exists.


  • FoxDev

    @CarrieVS said:

    Why can't there be cyborgs in fantasy?

    Because he is the Great All-Knowing Bla- no, can't say that with a straight face 😆



  • @CarrieVS said:

    Why can't there be cyborgs in fantasy?

    Because cyborg is science fiction.

    @aliceif said:

    Also, Shadowrun exists.

    Yeah and it's science fiction also the game sucked.



  • Which one?



  • THE ONE NAMED "SHADOWRUN" WHICH SUCKED!

    Actually the mechanics were solid, although a few skill combinations were cheap as hell. But it shipped with like only 4 maps? DEMOS have more maps!



  • *applies the infamous Chunky Salsa Rule to Blakeyrat*

    Now, you know which Shadowrun should be referred to in polite company...



  • I assume he means the Xbox360/PC game, even though there are 4 video games with just "Shadowrun" as the title.



  • @tarunik said:

    Now, you know which Shadowrun should be referred to in polite company...

    THE GAME WAS NAMED "SHADOWRUN". What the fuck dood. It's printed right on the box. What am I supposed to say when a game named "Shadowrun" sucks?

    I spent like $60 on that shit, and there were 4 maps and no fucking new ones patched in.



  • @blakeyrat said:

    Because cyborg is science fiction.

    Why?

    Would you like me to write you a fantasy story about cyborgs, just to show you what I mean?

    In fact, just off the top of my head, Harry Potter contains such a thing, and I'm sure it's not the only thing.



  • @CarrieVS said:

    Would you like me to write you a fantasy story about cyborgs,

    Can't be done.



  • @blakeyrat said:

    Can't be done.

    Has been done, can easily be done, I repeat, would you like me to do it?


  • FoxDev

    @blakeyrat said:

    Can't be done.

    In the same way that reading words can't be done.



  • @RaceProUK said:

    In the same way that reading words can't be done.

    In the same way "dry water" can't be done. Once there's a cyborg, it is no longer fantasy. Them's the rules.


  • FoxDev

    @blakeyrat said:

    Once there's a cyborg, it is no longer fantasy.

    "Today's Blakeyfact was brought to you by…"


  • ♿ (Parody)

    @RaceProUK said:

    "Today's Blakeyfact was brought to you by…"

    The letters :fu:.



  • Look this whole thread started around the fact that Yamikuronue said she was sexually attracted to a creature that is not only not even close to human, but probably has the same IQ as the common ground squirrel. Let's get back to the topic at-hand.



  • @ChaosTheEternal said:

    I assume he means the Xbox360/PC game, even though there are 4 video games with just "Shadowrun" as the title.

    Yeah -- that's probably what he was originally referring to; polite company sweeps that under the rug like a smelly gaseous emission, though. ;)

    He obviously has never heard of the tabletop RPG that is the father of all the other things called "Shadowrun" though. :P

    @blakeyrat said:

    Can't be done.

    What would you call a story with a cybernetically augmented fire-breathing dragon the size of a Cessna Citation in it, then?


  • Discourse touched me in a no-no place

    @boomzilla said:

    @RaceProUK said:
    "Today's Blakeyfact was brought to you by…"

    The letters :bs:.

    FTFY.


  • FoxDev

    @blakeyrat said:

    Yamikuronue said she was sexually attracted to a creature that is not only not even close to human, but probably has the same IQ as the common ground squirrel

    Oh look, another Blakeyfact 😆



  • @tarunik said:

    He obviously has never heard of the tabletop RPG that is the father of all the other things called "Shadowrun" though.

    Well just a thought here, but maybe they shouldn't have put their name on shit if they didn't want me thinking it was shit.

    @tarunik said:

    What would you call a story with a cybernetically augmented fire-breathing dragon the size of a Cessna Citation in it, then?

    Stupid.


  • Discourse touched me in a no-no place

    @RaceProUK said:

    Oh look, another Blakeyfact 😆

    He is very wisdomous.



  • @RaceProUK said:

    Oh look, another Blakeyfact

    It's in the other thread for anybody to read.



  • :effort:


  • FoxDev

    You can be into something without it being kinky. I'm into motorsport; doesn't mean I want to fuck an exhaust pipe.



  • @blakeyrat said:

    Let's get back to the topic at-hand.

    "Und, now zen, Mr. Rat... how do you feel about the topic... at hand? Hmm?"

    </freud>



  • @blakeyrat said:

    Once there's a cyborg, it is no longer fantasy.

    Stephen King's Dark Tower series has a giant cyborg bear. The story is much more fantasy than science fiction.



  • @blakeyrat said:

    Once there's a cyborg, it is no longer fantasy. Them's the rules.

    If there's magic, it's fantasy. There can be technology as well as magic, it is still fantasy: you are allowed to include things that exist in the real world, or might exist in a world that is to some degree plausible. Stories about dragons usually also have horses in them.

    The classic Standard Fantasy Setting has approximately Medieval technology, depending on the author's preference some things may be more advanced or less, but it's thereabouts. But Urban Fantasy is also a thing, set in an approximately modern world, and although I can't think of any off the top of my head, there is no reason on Earth or off it that a fantasy story could not be set in the future or a world with more advanced technology than the present, and I'm sure such works exist.

    True, with Urban Fantasy and the like there is often a blurring of the line between technology and magic: they may have magic-powered things that mimic some sort of technology ('technomancy' in Discworld is an excellent example). But usually or often not to exclusion. A world can have both magic and computers without the computers being powered by magic, it's not so bizarre. Also, if we can replace someone's body parts with functioning replicas (possibly better than the original), are they not a cyborg even if it is powered by magic? And besides, you often get rules-based magic: to invert the famous quote, any sufficiently well-described magic is indistinguishable from technology - it's just technology exploiting an aspect of nature that isn't and couldn't be real.



  • @Jaime said:

    Stephen King's Dark Tower series has a giant cyborg bear. The story is much more fantasy than science fiction.

    Up is down.


  • ♿ (Parody)

    @CarrieVS said:

    There can be technology as well as magic,

    Most of what goes by the name "technology" in SF is really fantasy, and not in the Clarkeian sense.



  • @CarrieVS said:

    Stories about dragons usually also have horses in them.

    Right; a story with one mythical creature would also have a different type of mythical creature. Duh.

    @CarrieVS said:

    But Urban Fantasy is also a thing, set in an approximately modern world, and although I can't think of any off the top of my head, there is no reason on Earth or off it that a fantasy story could not be set in the future or a world with more advanced technology than the present, and I'm sure such works exist.

    Based on everything I know about the word "urban", I can only assume that "urban fantasy" is simple a fantasy novel where all of the characters are black.

    Also that is one hell of a whopper of a sentence.

    @CarrieVS said:

    A world can have both magic and computers without the computers being powered by magic, it's not so bizarre.

    Computers aren't science fiction. Unless they're like holograms or made of crystals or something.

    @CarrieVS said:

    Also, if we can replace someone's body parts with functioning replicas (possibly better than the original), are they not a cyborg even if it is powered by magic?

    Nope. Golem.



  • @boomzilla said:

    Most of what goes by the name "technology" in SF is really fantasy, and not in the Clarkeian sense.

    Correct. If you're lucky, they're at least self-aware about it (see: the "Heisenberg Compensators" that make Star Trek transporters work), but otherwise Star Trek transporters are clearly fantasy. Other elements in Star Trek, like generating energy by colliding matter and anti-matter are clearly sci-fi. But transporters? Fantasy.

    When you get into the later years of Voyager with the magical Borg nanoprobes that can do literally anything at all, they might as well just swap the word "nanoprobe" with "magical genie" in the screenplay; it'd have the same effect.



  • @blakeyrat said:

    Right; a story with one mythical creature would also have a different type of mythical creature. Duh.

    Horses. They have a leg at each corner, go 'neigh', and you can ride on their backs?

    @blakeyrat said:

    that is one hell of a whopper of a sentence.

    Sorry. I will try to be more careful to make things easy to read.

    @blakeyrat said:

    Computers aren't science fiction. Unless they're like holograms or made of crystals or something.

    Where did I say that they were?

    @blakeyrat said:

    Nope. Golem.

    As far as I can see, a golem is a magic-powered robot. A flesh and blood person with golem parts would be a magic-powered cyborg. But we can disagree on that: since magic doesn't exist and biomechatronics is only beginning to exist, it's probably going to be hard to find an established definition.

    The other option for cyborgs in a fantasy story still stands. I will write you a fantasy story with a cyborg.


  • ♿ (Parody)

    @blakeyrat said:

    If you're lucky, they're at least self-aware about it

    I don't think it's terribly important. I have various reasons for reading SF. If the story itself is fun, that's usually enough. Other stuff is worthwhile to me based on the ideas explored. Underlying technology may or may not be terribly plausible, though it can also be an analog for something that is.

    One very interesting idea book that probably fits hard SF and fantasy very well is The Clockwork Rocket. Hmm...the sequels are out...need to pick those up.

    Overall, I think "Speculative Fiction" is a better label, since it gets away from pointless Science vs Fantasy debates.

    Now if only we could find a cure for puppy sadness.



  • @CarrieVS said:

    Horses. They have a leg at each corner, go 'neigh', and you can ride on their backs?

    I know what a horse is. Sheesh.

    @CarrieVS said:

    I will write you a fantasy story with a cyborg.

    Make it sexy.



  • @blakeyrat said:

    @CarrieVS said:
    Why can't there be cyborgs in fantasy?

    Because cyborg is science fiction.

    @blakeyrat said:

    @CarrieVS said:
    Would you like me to write you a fantasy story about cyborgs,

    Can't be done.

    Have you ever read the Apprentice Adept series by Piers Anthony? It has magic (fantasy) with cyborgs and androids and space travel (sci-fi). I'd call it primarily a fantasy series though.



  • @abarker said:

    Have you ever read the Apprentice Adept series by Piers Anthony? It has magic (fantasy) with cyborgs and androids and space travel (sci-fi). I'd call it primarily a fantasy series though.

    Then they aren't cyborgs, they're golems.



  • @blakeyrat said:

    @CarrieVS said:
    Also, if we can replace someone's body parts with functioning replicas (possibly better than the original), are they not a cyborg even if it is powered by magic?

    Nope. Golem.

    Bzzt! Wrong! Definition of a golem:

    1 (In Jewish legend) a clay figure brought to life by magic.
    EXAMPLE SENTENCES
    1.1 An automaton or robot.[1]

    In other words, an animated creation which is wholly artificial. What @CarrieVs described cannot be described as a golem because it is only partially artificial. Care to try again?



  • Instead of a cybernetic arm, you have a golem arm. Duh.



  • @blakeyrat said:

    Then they aren't cyborgs, they're golems.

    No. There are cyborgs in the series. As in people with cybernetic parts. There are also golems.



  • @blakeyrat said:

    Instead of a cybernetic arm, you have a golem arm. Duh.

    That doesn't make the individual a golem. Double duh.


  • FoxDev

    this entire topic, and everyone in it, reminds me of this quote from a very great man

    Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.
    The argument goes something like this: "I refuse to prove that I exist,'" says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing."
    "But," says Man, "The Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. QED."
    "Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.
    "Oh, that was easy," says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white and gets himself killed on the next zebra crossing

    -Douglas Adams



  • @blakeyrat said:

    @CarrieVS said:
    Why can't there be cyborgs in fantasy?

    Because cyborg is science fiction.

    So, you can't mix SF and Fantasy.
    @blakeyrat said:
    Star Trek transporters are clearly fantasy. Other elements in Star Trek, like generating energy by colliding matter and anti-matter are clearly sci-fi.

    But you can mix SF and Fantasy.

    Makes perfect sense.

    Also: NSFW because horseballs.



  • @Gaska said:

    Fun fact: elephants are quite good at abstract thinking, compared to most other animals.

    That actually is a fun fact!



  • @Gaska said:

    Fun fact: elephants are quite good at abstract thinking, compared to most other animals.

    This holds for any animal with the slightest capability of abstract thinking. What's more interesting is how someone arrived at this conclusion.


  • Banned

    @eskel said:

    What's more interesting is how someone arrived at this conclusion.

    They made an experiment where they put a fruit above the elephant high enough so it can't reach it with its trunk. The elephant quickly built stairs to the fruit out of the boxes lying around, on its first try, without any prior training. The experiment was repeated several times in various configurations, and elephant always reached the goal. In some scenarios, elephants had to cooperate with each other, and they passed those tests too. No citations because I don't care enough to google the relevant papers now.

    That kinda sounds like Portal. Without portals. And without AI-controlled testing facility trying to kill her test subject.



  • You're welcome.

    That is the exact opposite of abstract thinking. Everything is about visible and tangible objects. I'm not entirely convinced that what they claim in the abstract is really justified by their results.

    Fun: yes 😄 . Fact: not so much 😞.

    See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clever_Hans


  • Banned

    Abstract, as in it has to imagine that it needs something high to stand on, and that it can make it out of lower things it can stand on. Or maybe I don't know what abstract thinking is?


Log in to reply