I'm the discojuice dude, philosopher, arrogant prick, stupid fucker, writer, coder, artist, generalist. Ask me whatever the fuck you want.
-
Maybe first, why are you (guys in general) so offended of what I think?
It's kind of our thing.
-
I'm betting nobody else can do it yet / right now. And, granted, I also can't do it right now. If anyone could have done it, it would already be here.
Yeah, you're still full of shit.
-
Income is a financial result to a social movement.
E_DISCOJUICE_OVERFLOW
I defend my way of life from self-righteous narcissists
There's a point here: don't bother arguing with self-righteous narcissists.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.
-
-
Just do not fucking call me lazy
Again, to me, if you care this much to what I call or think, there's something wrong with how you perceive yourself. That being said...
Also again, I never meant to be pejorative. "bad" and "good" are all subjective experiences in each one mind. I was just trying to use the more precise word to describe my point of view. And I am calling myself lazy for most of my life, including every now and then. I'll always need that resting, but not because my body or brain is tired, it's just because I do want to enjoy other aspects.
Do not mistake the utopian goals with who we are. Do not take everything so radically, and, above all, do not fucking listen to me.
-
Conflating economic power with life success sure isn't my idea of utopia, but each to their own.
Don't mind @Arantor. I think he was just trying to be nice by challenging such a radicalised viewpoint.
You're like a little kid playing the lottery, being convinced that you'll win. If you honestly think that even here in the west everyone has a chance to succeed that is woefully naive. In order to produce a capitalist winner or two you need a whole bunch of losers to set them apart - and no - I don't think the cause of losing laziness. The system mandates it. I used to work in tax law for a good number of years before switching to medical computer science. One of my reasons: couldn't stand seeing good, kind, hardworking people have their existences ruined by banks, big corporations, economic crisis, new tax legislation and other circumstances outside their control.
But nothing wrong with trying this out yourself. Not saying you won't succeed, just that it's much harder then you think and that you'll need not only hard work, but also luck. If you're a fair skinned guy, privilege might help you out too.
-
No, we just went because we were here, it was here and it looked like fun.
I don't think the big burly chap behind the bar would appreciate being compared to a swallow...
-
You're not collecting sanitary toilets because you're lazy too.
You could have a large collection of toilets by now.
-
-
Repeating myself too much now. Capitalism isn't a zero sum game.
And I never liked playing undeclared games, so I don't. Specially not that lottery you see there. I've got a big enough bag of luck - it's all about what you do with what's given to you, not keep waiting for winning any specific lottery.
Thanks for the "little kid" compliment, though. It's good to know someone think "I haven't forgot".
-
Eh, you'll learn, just like the rest of us...
-
This post is deleted!
-
So, you're actually "trying to make a strong AI"?
How do I put this... many, many people have tried the exact same thing, just because they completely misunderstood the nature of the problem and had a hunch that everyone before was approaching it the wrong way but they would do it right. There's no single magical algorithm that holds the secret to talking robots if you apply it just right. The human brain works by applying dozens of ad-hoc "tricks" to solve separate problems in different ways.
Look, at least try to catch up on existing formal AI and cognitive science research before trying to go on your own. I promise there's loads of incredibly interesting stuff there.
-
No, they were just lazy, weren't you paying attention?
-
So, you're actually "trying to make a strong AI"?
I'll bet the key is to use big enough electromagnets.
-
Maybe we're all misreading him and he has a buddy named Al (short for Albert) he's helping out at the gym.
-
-
dozens of ad-hoc "tricks"
I think that this is an underestimate, by many, many orders of magnitude. It's an evolved structure, so it's ad-hoc tricks all the way down.
-
I'll bet the key is to use big enough electromagnets.
Better still if they're quantum electromagnets.
-
Look, at least try to catch up on existing formal AI and cognitive science research before trying to go on your own. I promise there's loads of incredibly interesting stuff there.
I've tried, and can't make strong Ai without continually doing it so.
You've read me very wrong there, and I probably led you to do so: but I never said I have a magical formula in my head. It's opensource, crowdsource. All I have are a few hunches and I want to talk it over with everyone. As from the Wait but why article, all I believe is we need to get the conversation started.
I guess what I meant on my uniqueness is that I still can't see anyone else doing what I'm trying to do, even after openai, which got spot on in some of the technical aspects of it. Forget programming, I'm no programmer. I have to keep reminding me of that as well.
-
-
Am I the only one who thinks this is actually / also about a gay experience Paul had?
I really know nothing about him or Garfunkel, though...
Why am I soft in the middle
The rest of my life is so hardToo much poetry for me. 2 pine trees fires up 3 electrical trains.
-
that's one way of looking at a train wreck.
-
Your Mario AI sucks.
Hey, it figured out that if you run into the first Goomba in the level, you'll get further than if you just walk into it!
-
This still hasn't been answered?
Edit: Never mind. I thought I reached the bottom of the thread due to discourse.