Meta.d is sad
-
Non-sucky search. So far, when I've needed to find something in our KB, I've found it, or gotten confirmation from others that it doesn't exist at all. I don't think I've been handed a URL to a topic that I'd not found.
XD HAHAHAHA oh that's a good one... You're a prankster, you.
Oh wait fuck he's serious
-
There's only a few month's work on the oneboxing to make it into a decent web browser...
-
To be fair, Discourse would be a lot better than the knowledgebase system we have at work here. If there's something I need to find out, I have to guess who to go and ask, because that's by far the most efficient method of discovering anything.
-
...if you assume each bug can only be reported by one person.... that image shows TDWTF responsible for reporting at least 90 defects.
That's 90 bugs that got past their process reported by one install alone in the... what, year we've had it?
I just stumbled across this from days gone by, it's quite amusing looking back on it
https://what.thedailywtf.com/t/apologies-discourse-is-buggy/522
-
I hope you've got a real bug database too. Actually tracking bugs in a forum would be TRWTF. (You could start a forum thread for each bug report, but it's the bug DB that holds things like what the state is.)
Filed under: stating the f'ing obvious since the 1970's
Heh, he never saw that coming...
-
The jeffism! it's spreading!
-
I think he's right on this one, though. If google takes you to the category page you're going be all, "WTF‽" I hate it when I see a link on google that looks helpful, then I follow it and find out it's from the list of topics or questions or whatever and the list of stuff has moved on so the thing I wanted is not there any more.
Much better to get links to topics, where the canonical stuff makes sense.