SourceForge takes over SF accounts; releases gold-laced installers of questioned monetary value
-
I don't keep up much with Mozilla development, since they still1 haven't made their browser 64-bit
I just compile it locally. Trouble is it doesn't solve...
which means I run into OOMs way too frequent for my liking (and yes, I'm a tab hoarder).
At least not on Nightly (under Linux.)
-
Meh, the new tab page sucks anyways.
New Tab Tools is a must-have add-on.
-
Well yeah. Apparently it only replaces empty tiles with "ad" tiles, though. Still dumb.
-
But how much of that commit is explicit, and how much of that is heap-unclassified?
Don't know - I'll have to wait till I get back to that computer - but using over half its address space at this point is a good sign it should be using a larger address space, no?
-
@Dreikin said:
I don't keep up much with Mozilla development, since they still1 haven't made their browser 64-bit
I just compile it locally. Trouble is it doesn't solve...
which means I run into OOMs way too frequent for my liking (and yes, I'm a tab hoarder).
At least not on Nightly (under Linux.)
Do you mean Firefox OOMs before physical RAM is exhausted even when 64-bit?
-
are you people doing in Firefox for it to consume 4GB of RAM?
-
Do you mean Firefox OOMs before physical RAM is exhausted even when 64-bit?
Not checked log for errors, but the instance running on my work laptop is currently using 20% of memory (4G VIRT, 1.2G RES) and 35% CPU (according to htop) - and that's low judging by empirical evidence.
I've not been to work since the 22nd (last Friday.)
-
-
wtf: are you people doing in Firefox for it to consume 4GB of RAM?
Web browsing. The thing it is supposedly meant for.
-
are you people doing in Firefox for it to consume 4GB of RAM?
What the internet is there for: p0rn, cats & other silly stuff
-
WinSCP isn't utterly shit.
-
Wait, but I'm pretty sure it comes with Unity-specific plugins on Ubuntu. How does that work, then?
-
Not checked log for errors, but the instance running on my work laptop is currently using 20% of memory (4G VIRT, 1.2G RES) and 35% CPU (according to htop) - and that's low judging by empirical evidence.
Hm. My primary has 32 GB, so not safe, apparently.
Filed Under: I've managed to OOM Chrome on it too, Several times
-
Explorer supports plain FTP and WebDAV.
I think both are read-only, though.
-
Wait, but I'm pretty sure it comes with Unity-specific plugins on Ubuntu. How does that work, then?
I'd guess the plugins are installed separately by the package manager into the plugins directory. Or they have an agreement with Mozilla to let them do that.
-
-
People use Ubuntu with Unity?
Unity's pretty much the reason I don't use Ubuntu Desktop.
-
People use Ubuntu with Unity?
Apparently. The best option is, of course, not to use Ubuntu at all.
Don't make me laugh.
But... I've been told being funny is a good thing. And that laughter is healthy.
-
They have an agreement with Mozilla that allows them to continue to use the Mozilla trademarks and make distro-specific patches (e.g. exposing the menu bar as a GNOME menu bar so it gets hoisted into Unity's clone of Apple's menu bar) in exchange for following Mozilla's strict guidelines regarding QA and submitting more general patches upstream. In addition, the extensions they install that change search providers and homepages and so on are in a separate .DEB from Firefox proper.
-
People use Ubuntu with Unity?
WHY DID THEY NAME THEIR FUCKING WINDOW BULLSHIT AFTER ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR GAME ENGINES!
Jesus this conversation was confusing until I remembered how FUCKING RETARDED EVERYTHING IN THE LINUX WORLD IS especially their naming.
"Hey guyz, you know how Unity is a hugely popular and well-known game engine? For years?" "Yeah?" "Let's name something COMPLETELY UNRELATED also Unity!" "Brilliant! Bring me over those paint cans, I'm not done huffing the sandalwood tan yet." *snort* "Oh that's good shit man, I feel like we should go make sure nothing in .gitattributes matches any of the settings in git.config."
-
Internet explorer (and firefox. And chrome. And ...) supports those read only. I'm pretty sure windows explorer can at least write to plain FTP. Not sure about webdav or encrypted FTP; it's been ages since I had to deal with it.
-
Explorer supports plain FTP and WebDAV.
I think both are read-only, though.
Nope, you can use it to upload and delete files off an FTP site.
-
Ok; I know XP allowed that but I seem to recall Vista didn't for some reason, but I must be mistaken.
-
They still have users? I'm mostly amazed that what's left on SF hasn't already started a migration to GitHub in all honesty.
Mine's still on SF because moving it requires effort.
But I don't push my users there to get stuff - I have copies on my website. When I first released it in 2002, I did - and most of my users had trouble figuring it out.
-
Ok; I know XP allowed that but I seem to recall Vista didn't for some reason, but I must be mistaken.
I tried it in 8.1 before replying. I assume it works in 10 as well, but I haven't booted my 10 machine today.
-
Mine's still on SF because moving it requires effort.
I'm a dev on a Roguelike that hasn't seen a release since like 2001, but I checked yesterday and it's still getting like 10-20 downloads a month. Go figure.
-
Yep, it does
-
WHY DID THEY NAME THEIR FUCKING WINDOW BULLSHIT AFTER ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR GAME ENGINES!
Some of us were wondering why the game engine was named after a piece of crappy desktop software. :D
-
WinSCP isn't utterly shit.
Have they fixed the thing where SFTP transfers are just brutally, painfully, horribly slow - like, tens of kilobytes per second over an unloaded ADSL connection? That's what put me off it last time I played with it.
-
WHY DID THEY NAME THEIR FUCKING WINDOW BULLSHIT AFTER ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR GAME ENGINES!
Have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe, you've got it the other way around? Things don't always happen in the order you learn about them.
-
Have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe, you've got it the other way around? Things don't always happen in the order you learn about them.
How about someone goes look for some facts?
http://unity3d.com/public-relations shows us that development on the Unity engine started in 2001 and that it was released in 2005.
-
How about someone goes look for some facts?
Damn it!
puts popcorn away
I did look it up, but I wanted to see who the more stubborn one will be...
-
You should really pull your tantrum at Mac naming. Pages. Numbers, my ass. I knew what numbers are since I was 4 or 5. Now they tell me it's a piece of crappy spreadsheet software.
And now, photos. Fuck them, really.
-
Before 3.0, Unity was shit, and had promile of its current popularity. Mid-2010, more people knew about Unity DE than Unity Engine.
-
tab hoarder
These days I mostly use it just when I need/want to use a particular add-on.
I used to do that, but I haven't even installed it (yet, anyway) on this computer.
-
Have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe, you've got it the other way around?
No. Because I haven't.
-
You should really pull your tantrum at Mac naming. Pages. Numbers, my ass.
My ass is the best piece of Mac software.
-
If most AAA video games created before this year couldn't use up that much memory, I don't see how a browser could.
-
Unity-specific plugins
Isn't there a Unity (game engine) plugin for browsers? I wonder if that works on systems using Unity (desktop environment). Is Unity (Assassins' Creed game) written in the Unity (game engine) engine?
-
lojban actually solves this problem: djarspageti means "the thing commonly called spaghetti that is a food". samyspageti would be "the thing commonly called spaghetti that is a computer", and so on.
-
"the thing commonly called spaghetti that is a computer"
-
…and the onebox is stupid
-
lojban
-
-
Isn't there a Unity (game engine) plugin for browsers?
Yes, the Unity Web Player.@ben_lubar said:I wonder if that works on systems using Unity (desktop environment).
Yes and no. Unity Technologies has no official release, but there's a special build of Wine called Pipelight that can handle the Windows one.@ben_lubar said:Is Unity (Assassins' Creed game) written in the Unity (game engine) engine?
No, it's written in the Anvil game engine, specific to Assassin's Creed and Prince of Persia.
-
You probably meant:
-
No, I meant the disambiguation page
-
That is the disambiguation page - just that the Software section is embedded.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity#Software
-
Ah.
Still, I posted what I wanted to post ;)
-
Prince of Persia.
Dafuq?
You be trippin', yo.
Unless you meant Sands of Time or one of its shitty sequels.