Pluralisation oddities
-
https://meta.discourse.org/t/pluralisation-issues/27601Not a big issue, but still, felt like reporting it
-
It could easily be fixed by putting the labels above the numbers, like "created" and "last post"
-
…that's totally not the issue I reported
-
…that's totally not the issue I reported
it would however solve the gramatical issue of pluralization. ;-)
in tabular format (as label over would imply) it's still grammatically correct to list 'likes' even if the count is 1.
-
It's a different way of solving it. "1 likes" doesn't look right, but "likes: 1" is ok.
-
it would however solve the gramatical issue of pluralization. ;-)
in tabular format (as label over would imply) it's still grammatically correct to list 'likes' even if the count is 1.
I… well, yes, it would
-
there goes one like to show it
-
Labels over the numbers would be consistent with the first two things.
-
Also seemingly illustrates a one-box bug. There's an image in the meta.d post, which it tries to use as onebox image, and fails (empty src attribute).
-
-
-
I actually kind of agree with the sentiment expressed here:
-
There's a reason I raised it as
ux
and notbug
-
I actually kind of agree with the sentiment expressed here:
if it was a bug report i'd agree, but that was clearly logged as a low priority UX enhancement request.
:-P
-
if it was a bug report i'd agree, but that was clearly logged as a low priority UX enhancement request.
Not here it wasn't!
-
Not here it wasn't!
Only because we don't have aux
section!Give me a
ux
section, or give me something else!
Give me aux
section, or give me something else!
-
-
Only because we don't have a ux section!
It's called, "Meta." Not that I really care.
-
we don't have a ux section
How many levels of category nesting are possible?
Meta→Bug→UX
Meta→Enhancement Request→UX
Meta→Enhancement Request→UX→Bikeshedding
-
Meta -> UX -> Bug -> UX
For the UX on reporting a UX bug
Meta -> UX -> UX
For discussing the UX on discussing UX
Meta -> UX -> UX -> UX -> UX -> UX -> UX -> UX -> UX -> UX -> UX -> UX -> UX -> UX
For discussing the UX on discussing UX on discussing UX on discussing UX on discussing UX on discussing UX on discussing UX on discussing UX on discussing UX on discussing UX E_STACK_OVERFLOW
Filed Under: It's UX all the way down
-
-
Still playing catchup...
How many levels of category nesting are possible?
Two. Top level and one sub-level.
Meta→Bug→UX
Meta→Enhancement Request→UX
Meta→Enhancement Request→UX→BikesheddingThus none of those are possible.
-
Thus none of those are possible.
I disagree; you just need to put the following sub-categories into meta:
Bug→UX
Enhancement Request→UX
Enhancement Request→UX→Bikeshedding
It lets you put arrows in the category name, right?
-
Ewwww....
-
-
-
Bug â–®UX
Enhancement Request â–®UX
Enhancement Request â–®UX â–®Bikeshedding
FTFY
Filed under: We need a color-setting Unicode combining character
-
Filed under: We need a color-setting Unicode combining character
Evil ideas thread is →
500 Internal server error
↑ way
-
-
-
Oh, that Fox! Makes sense now
-
Shots fired.
Inb4 politics news flame-war
-
-
politics news
politics is all lies. always.
news is news. and not always lies but often twisted to serve an agenda.
wether you sit on the left or the right this much is true.
-
-
I disagree; you just need to put the following sub-categories into meta:
Bug→UXEnhancement Request→UXEnhancement Request→UX→Bikeshedding
It lets you put arrows in the category name, right?
You sicken me
, sir.
-
You're restricting that to just Fox? Seems rather a narrow view.
-
no. i feel the same about all news corporations.
it's just easier to find relevant clipart with the fox logo than (for example) MSNBC