I, ChatGPT
-
@cvi I, for one, welcome our new regemoji masters.
-
@cvi said in I, ChatGPT:
@boomzilla said in I, ChatGPT:
Yes, we could reinvent it over and over!
Yeah, but this time we have Unicode, so maybe we can create a variant of regex that uses the full power of that.
Or just use APL
-
@cvi said in I, ChatGPT:
maybe we can create a variant of regex that uses the full power of that
-
Regex already supports Unicode, at least if you use PCRE?
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
Regex already supports Unicode, at least if you use PCRE?
Yeah, but the regular expression itself just uses plain old boring vanilla ASCII characters for its special sauce. Why use '(' when you could hypothetically get a U+4A7B7 SPECIAL REGEX GROUP LEFT DELIMITER?
-
@cvi
Why have this...
^([a-zA-Z0-9._%-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,6})*$
When you could have this?
📎📤👍🏻a-zA-Z0-9.💩%-👎🏻+@👍🏻a-zA-Z0-9.-👎🏻+\.👍🏻a-zA-Z👎🏻🚱2,6🚳📥🎏🐄
-
@loopback0 because you changed the underscore for the poop emoji. Change in implementation should not affect the underlying result.
-
@Arantor 💩is the character for underscore in regmojex
-
@loopback0 that sounds like a missed opportunity. Did you read the regmojex spec correctly? I thought that was used instead of
-
, which would make the regmojexpression much poopier.
-
@loopback0 but what if you want to match a poop emoji literal? Would that be
\💩
instead?
-
@Arantor to match a poop emoji you need to use
_
.
-
@loopback0 that seems… 💩 as an outcome.
Dammit, emoji don’t italicise.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
Dammit, emoji don’t italicise.
Here's a nickel, kid, get a better browser
-
@Applied-Mediocrity said in I, ChatGPT:
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
Dammit, emoji don’t italicise.
Here's a nickel, kid, get a better browser
🍹FTFY.
-
@Arantor said in I, ChatGPT:
@loopback0 that seems… 💩 as an outcome.
Dammit, emoji don’t italicise.
💩🤌
-
@Applied-Mediocrity I’m on an iPad. No “better browser” for me.
-
-
-
How to train your AI model to have blackjack and hookers:
-
@Applied-Mediocrity I'm not complaining though, my 2018 model iPad is still getting security updates...
-
@Arantor
:ipad_machine:
-
Filed under: It was JPEG when I found it
-
@Applied-Mediocrity said in I, ChatGPT:
Filed under: It was JPEG when I found it
I like the touch with the thumbs
-
Status: Well, fuck.
-
@dkf said in I, ChatGPT:
formally, it is event based
I wonder if that's why people seem to fear isolation?
-
-
-
-
@Zerosquare said in I, ChatGPT:
@Tsaukpaetra said in I, ChatGPT:
Well, fuck.
Don't you like your air of mystery?
It only helps sometimes.
-
-
@boomzilla Little does Joshua know that "francis" is also a bot.
-
@boomzilla AI will end dark patterns?
<Bender laughing>Oh wait, he’s serious.
<laughs harder>
-
@boomzilla I am shocked I tell you, just shocked, that the NYT would have such unethical behavior.
-
@boomzilla The importantester question here is why the fuck he had the sub to begin with.
-
@boomzilla In a moment of unawareness, I got accosted by some people trying to get donations for some charitable cause. They basically finished their whole spiel before I had the chance to react. Anyway, the cause didn't seem terrible, and I figured giving them some smallish donation would be the quickest and least painful way to end the encounter (I was also carrying cash, which is a bit of an exception). I fished out my wallet, got some cash, and offered it to the person.
: We don't take cash.
: Uh, I can pay by card?
: ...
: Fill in this form with all your personal details please..So, turns out what they want you to is to sign up for some sort of recurring thing. Aside from being somewhat adverse to filling in my details into a random form in the middle of the street, I really wasn't looking to sign up for a monthly thing. I give you $$$$, you take $$$$ and then we never talk to each other again.
I say as much.
: Well, it's easy, you just sign up now, and then go home and immediately cancel. Just call our team, explain the situation to the team, and they'll remove you, no problems.
Well, no, fuck you. I don't want to give you my personal data. I don't want to have to cancel your stupid "service". I didn't want to talk to you in the first place, really, so I really don't want to have to call to talk more in the future.
The conversation ended with something like
: You seemed like such a good person. Why are you quitting now?
-
@cvi said in I, ChatGPT:
You seemed like such a good person. Why are you quitting now?
-
@cvi What they really want is the ability to nag you in the future. Forever. Because you donated once.
-
@cvi That octopus is lacking three - or is this a "pentapus"?
-
@BernieTheBernie Two might be occluded, but I was wondering that too. (I did search for "fuckofftopus", so I do feel a bit short-changed on the number of fingers in the air ... but on the other hand, escalation is still possible.)
-
@cvi said in I, ChatGPT:
Two might be occluded
Yes, it looks to me like two are occluded as indicated. However, that still leaves it one appendage short.
-
The Fucktopus has 8 appendages, but only 5 of them have hands on the end.
https://www.etsy.com/de-en/listing/947424876/fucktopus-3456-middle-finger-octopus
-
@loopback0 said in I, ChatGPT:
The Fucktopus has 8 appendages
And the male Fucktopus actually has one extra appendage, which due to reasons of decency is not shown.
-
@BernieTheBernie I've always found it interesting how there are octopii who can release their sperm-carrying tentacle and present it to the female, rather than directly copulating.
Here you go. Go fuck yourself.
-
@BernieTheBernie said in I, ChatGPT:
@cvi That octopus is lacking three - or is this a "pentapus"?
pentadactyl
-
@Zecc said in I, ChatGPT:
@BernieTheBernie I've always found it interesting how there are octopii who can release their sperm-carrying tentacle and present it to the female, rather than directly copulating.
Here you go. Go fuck yourself.
-
-
@boomzilla
ChatNFTs are right around the corner
-
@boomzilla Given that most brokers can't beat random choice with their advice it has some chance of actually being better. But they have to resist the temptation to give it their own biases. Don't ever trust a LLM you didn't bias yourself.
-
@Bulb it’s just going to be automated pump and dumb schemes. The one thing you can be sure about: if their advice would actually make you money, they’d keep it to themselves. Their advice only makes them money.
E: *dump, but it’s too fitting to not leave it in.
-
@boomzilla They are a bit slow. Such things have existed for a long time now.