@e4tmyl33t Yeah, that's how it went down. People were able to figure things from the dates, with some extra help from that the poor blacking out didn't conceal an initial 'J' properly. So then it ended up producers starting with J who left around that time. (Although the dates was all they needed anyway, as the ones who edited the Change the Channel document figured it from just the dates.)
Also, then there was the fact that the indicent discussed in the screenshots wasn't the one revealed in the document so CA managed to out that there was a second victim in their eagerness to show they were doing swift action. (The first incident was a year before, as stated in the document. CA uses second incident from right before the firing to disprove the point of them not acting swiftly.)