I like RenameMaster. Its UI is a bit clunky but it is easy enough to use and has tons of options in its "script editor".
Also, no installer.
I like RenameMaster. Its UI is a bit clunky but it is easy enough to use and has tons of options in its "script editor".
Also, no installer.
@Maciejasjmj said:
There's no way to browse pictures one-by-one in a folder, unless you've added them to a photo library. Browsing from a thumbdrive? Sucks to be you.
And if you (like me) keep your photos on a NAS that backs up to the cloud, you can add your (SMB) network share to your photo library just fine.
Oh, but the photo app won't actually read them from there. It just completely ignores that part of your photo library...
@Maciejasjmj said:
Zooming out goes like this: 130%-120%-110%-100%-your photo library.
At least it's not as bad as IE: What were they thinking?
Sounds like the classic mismanagement that all TDWTF readers are familiar with:
[S]enior officials repeatedly expressed doubts that the computer systems for the federal exchange would be ready on time... Deadline after deadline was missed... By early this year, people inside and outside the federal bureaucracy were raising red flags.
The Government Accountability Office... warned in June that many challenges had to be overcome before the Oct. 1 rollout.
Mr. Chao’s superiors at the Department of Health and Human Services told him, in effect, that failure was not an option... Nor was rolling out the system in stages or on a smaller scale, as companies like Google typically do so that problems can more easily and quietly be fixed.
Marilyn B. Tavenner, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, both insisted in July that the project was not in trouble. Last month, Gary M. Cohen, the federal official in charge of health insurance exchanges, promised federal legislators that [the system would work] on Oct. 1.
Developers: We need more time.
Managers: LALALA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU! Failure is not an option! The project WILL roll out on [date]!
One person familiar with the system’s development said that the project was now roughly 70 percent of the way toward operating properly, but that predictions varied on when the remaining 30 percent would be done.
We all know what that really means. Ouch...
Others warned that the fixes themselves were creating new problems, and said that the full extent of the problems might not be known...
"These are not glitches," said an insurance executive who has participated in many conference calls on the federal exchange... "The extent of the problems is pretty enormous."
A round-the-clock effort is under way [to resolve the problems before the mid-December deadline].
Remind me: do massive government death marches ever end well?
Worried about their reputations, contractors are now publicly distancing themselves from the troubled parts of the federally run project.
(All quotes are from the New York Times)
Now updated with pretty printing! The error is still there (same resource), but now it pretty-prints the error in HTML!
Of course, the site still doesn't actually work...
@eViLegion said:
I'm not talking about the politics that cause this to happen. I'm talking about it being the default option.
You can't really separate those. It's the default option purely for political reasons. :)
The funny thing is, I used to work in government archives (before programming), and I have just a tiny inkling of the massive amounts of money that our government wastes every day on absolute crap. Whenever a "government shutdown" happens, the person-wanting-more-money (who is always the current person-in-power) makes sure to shut down the parts of the government that people will notice - so things like the national parks are first on the cutting block.
But that's completely unnecessary. There are countless[1] things our government is constantly doing that no one would (immediately) notice if they were cut, yet they continue right along during a "shutdown".
-Steve
[1] OK, it's not actually countless. I strongly suspect (but have not proved) that it's aleph-null. :)
Scaling and load testing are solved problems. If you pass a law requiring almost everyone in the country to buy something and then open the marketplace, you should expect (and plan for) scale.
Oh, and it's probably a bad idea to expose all your error details in a (very) public website.
@Ben L. said:
It compiles down to CSS, similar to how C++ compiles down to C.
While this was true in the 70s and 80s, it's certainly not true today. C++ today is never used to compile down to C (although I suppose it theoretically could).
You can view it without having to log in, unless something is blocking FB entirely. In that case, bummer, 'cuz this forum software is so... incredibly... horribly... awful that I wouldn't even try to duplicate the FB post here. Sorry!