But it really resonates with my personality.
No-one else adds ham like I add ham. Oooh the hams I have added. Never will you have ever seen a ham more added than when I've finished with it.
I AM THE ADDER OF HAM.
But it really resonates with my personality.
No-one else adds ham like I add ham. Oooh the hams I have added. Never will you have ever seen a ham more added than when I've finished with it.
I AM THE ADDER OF HAM.
Once you're out of the room, don't forget to shout until your voice is hoarse, then get on that horse and ride away.
Can I get a version of that at 184x184 pixels?
I'd like to make it my steam avatar.
Also, dude, chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American, please.
If you start your own bank, are you allowed to do the fractional reserve thing? That might make it quite entertaining.
@Mo6eB said:
...whom stuff...
Easy rule of thumb, that doesn't rely on non language scholars (e.g. virtually everyone) understanding nominative or dative:
If you wish to put who/whom in a sentence, try using he/him instead, then replace he with who, and him with whom.
So "he dislikes this interface" becomes "who dislikes this interface", since "him dislikes this interface" is wrong.
@blakeyrat said:
You're kind of an asshole, aren't you?
England... where people say both dude, and wank. We import a lot of words, thereby becoming the best at language.
The bugginess of Skyrim wasn't even the engine. It was the scripts that ran on the engine. Almost certainly these will have been maintained by two completely different teams, working in two different languages, with the ones who've got a clue put on the engine team, and the interns put on the scripts (because its less dangerous that way). So likely as not, each type of fix (make engine faster/fix stupid mission errors) required a totally different human resource to fix it (I guess the engine guys probably could fix the mission errors, but who wants to go trawling through reams of interns script?).
You seem to love jumping to the conclusion that people have "missed your point" as though your points are somehow so insightfully complex that the person to whom you address it can't possibly have understood. Maybe they dismissed your point as angrily stating the obvious with foghorn subtlety, without actually saying anything of merit or interest to the person to whom you say it?
Anyway... is the source of your anger because someone uses C++, thus slightly increasing development time and slightly decreasing code maintainability? If so, then I think you're kinda missing the point that there simply is no other language with the power and available tools, which will allow you to craft a common code-base across all the available gaming platforms. So its kinda retarded to say people should be using another language, until such time as another language can be easily made to work on ALL of those platforms.
[url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-22991838]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-22991838[/url]
This article has annoyed the fuck out of me today. All the papers seem to be covering it, and all of them are just as retarded.
Basically, the article says that plants regulate their usage of food overnight, according to "some equation" which isn't given.
Then they make mention of 2 molecules used to do this, which haven't apparently yet been discovered, but which have single letter names.
All of this, somehow, leads to the conclusion that the plants are "doing math(s)".
Noone seems to have noticed the difference between a process, and a mathematical description of a process.
What in the name of fuck has happened to science?
Once you're out of the room, don't forget to shout until your voice is hoarse, then get on that horse and ride away.
Well this is why we need a guy playing the government... to specify the rules on the ratio of how much the banker can lend, given the reserves he has available.
Assuming you have stuck to the rules, you don't lose, the government bails you out. Likewise, if the government doesn't have any money, the IMF steps in.
We could probably also find some way to model sub-prime mortgage trading.
You'd probably need one player needs to be the government's legislative branch, and another to play the role of the IMF.
If you start your own bank, are you allowed to do the fractional reserve thing? That might make it quite entertaining.
Also, dude, chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American, please.
But it really resonates with my personality.
No-one else adds ham like I add ham. Oooh the hams I have added. Never will you have ever seen a ham more added than when I've finished with it.
I AM THE ADDER OF HAM.
Can I get a version of that at 184x184 pixels?
I'd like to make it my steam avatar.
@dkf said:
It's much more important to assume that the initial placement of cars and goats is random (with uniform distribution).
I just imagined Monty Hall distributing some kind of uniform to the goats for them to wear. This would immeasurably improve the game.