Yeah. That's like the baseline for blakey.
The challenge would be to make him not pissed off.
:nod.co:
Yeah. That's like the baseline for blakey.
The challenge would be to make him not pissed off.
:nod.co:
@abarker said:This is contrary to your previous statement:A lady is allowed to contradict herself and/or change her mind at any time!
Wait, are you a lady or a fox or an enigma wrapped in a mystery? I'm getting a mite confused here.
@abarker said:@accalia said:@abarker said:@accalia said:@abarker said:@accalia said:No, that would be considered an attack on her sovereignty.How would an attack on one's mental state be an attack on their sovereignty?
It is because i said it is.
That does not follow.
It follows because i lead it.
Did you put it on a wheeled sign then?
nah. a hoversign is far more efficient.
Doris wants to examine your hoversign.
So far, I liked every single post in this thread manually. On mobile. I demand a badge for that
We don't take kindly to demands …
Fucking hell Discourse with random jellypotato! Completely lost my spot on the liking!Can we have the old usercard jellypotato back? Back then we didn't have these random ones every few minutes at least!
Seconded!
@abarker said:get your mind off ■■■■■■■.I need some more holidays so I can get my mind out of Belgium
Maybe if you had a Sub-Etha Thumb.
Is this the questions thread now?
We don't need a new questions thread. The questions thread is
Damn, I have over 25% of the posts in this thread, and Duckhorse hasn't told me to let others talk more.
@loopback0 said:to make him not pissed off
You mean that that state exists?
Hypothetically.
SO DO YOU WANT THE BOTS OR NOT?!?! MAKE UP YOUR MlND!!!
You were the one calling for free :badgers:!
I just point out the weakness in your plan.
As often as people get gender wrong with you and @accalia, are you sure?
@abarker said:@accalia said:@abarker said:@accalia said:No, that would be considered an attack on her sovereignty.How would an attack on one's mental state be an attack on their sovereignty?
It is because i said it is.
That does not follow.
It follows because i lead it.
Did you put it on a wheeled sign then?
@abarker said:I challenge you to get blakey into a not-pissed off state.[spoiler]Praise old Mac stuff.[/spoiler]
Hey! No hints!
Probably not. This one will die again soon. But, then, who am I to judge?
This thread now receiving special mention in a Discodefinition.
This one never really took off. It was started back when we first discussed topagination.
While this is proof that even Jeff is incapable of being wrong 100% of the time, it doesn't mean that what he said was relevant.
I will admit that hiding the scrollbar when it has no relevance to the UI, such as in discourse, can serve a purpose. As does hiding the scrollbar when there is limited screenspace (hello mobile!). But why bother hiding the scrollbar in other cases? It does a few useful things:
So how is hiding the scrollbar - in general - a Good Idea™?
@abarker said:Yet another reason to avoid the bots!/t/1k was excluded before @sockbot became a thing.
Hey! Keep your logic out of this!
So I've still been checking out meta.d, just to keep an eye out for anything that might be of interest to us. This morning I got there, and I wasn't logged in. Figuring they finally remembered me, I tried logging in to see what my suspension looks like, but my credentials weren't accepted. Fine, it's been a while, maybe I forgot my password. Let's try resetting:
I guess they didn't like me calling them out for the wholesale ban of our forum in my bio.