Teams is directionally challenged
-
Status: I wanted to find a message in Teams. I knew the context and around the right date, and wanted to get the conversation around it to be sure I remembered said context correctly. The context is "when weather is dangerous enough to report". I found the relevant message, and click the "go to message" button and...
Really?!?! REALLY?!!
Okay, I know I just started taking crazy pills, but in what world could this EVER be useful? GET ME TO THE FUCKING CONVERSATION!
As far as I can tell, there's literally no way to simply scroll to the found message. At best you get a one-before-one-after preview in the search results, but there's no way to get to that part of the conversation in the normal view.
Why the hell thought this was a good idea?
-
@Tsaukpaetra Microsoft has people that think a lot of things are good ideas.
-
@Tsaukpaetra said in Teams is directionally challenged:
Why the hell thought this was a good idea?
Weird question aside, I think a lot of this sort of thing comes about when doing the obviously "right" thing was just kinda hard, so you
out.
-
@boomzilla said in Teams is directionally challenged:
when doing the obviously "right" thing was just kinda hard,
Yeah. I tried manually scrolling back to that date, and... well, let's just say, the UI fuckered up the order of messages and leave it at that.
-
@Tsaukpaetra Also a lot of jellybean and jellypotato.
-
@Steve_The_Cynic said in Teams is directionally challenged:
@Applied-Mediocrity Huh. OK, in that case I have no idea.
DisplayPort has higher bandwidth than HDMI. One reason why VR headsets moved to DP over HDMI.
-
-
@Zerosquare said in Teams is directionally challenged:
@Bulb said in Teams is directionally challenged:
Microsoft has people that think
They have Raymond.
-
@Zerosquare said in Teams is directionally challenged:
@Bulb said in Teams is directionally challenged:
Microsoft has people that think
They do think. They think a lot of things are good ideas.
Filed under: that are really, really bad ideas, really
-
@dcon said in Teams is directionally challenged:
@Zerosquare said in Teams is directionally challenged:
@Bulb said in Teams is directionally challenged:
Microsoft has people that think
They have Raymond."People" kind of implies plural.
-
@topspin said in Teams is directionally challenged:
"People" kind of implies plural.
In today's world?
-
@topspin they have Raymond and whoever signs off on Raymond writing his blog on company time. That counts, right?
