Emoji testing
-
Lets see if this works:
-
-
@hungrier Looks like the 2px off one has the right spacing. What do you guys think?
-
@hungrier Both look ok. The 2 px one looks better if I zoom in.
Knowing the spacing and the image's dimensions you could probably determine the exact adjustment required.
(emphasis on "you" )
-
@Zecc said in Emoji testing:
Knowing the spacing and the image's dimensions you could probably determine the exact adjustment required.
The image was originally 24x23, with a 24 frame loop. So I think the original version would've been perfect if there hadn't been any spacing. There's 2 px between them in every browser I tried (Firefox and Chromium-ish on Windows, Firefox on Linux), so -2px should make a perfect loop. The -1px version is square like the standard set of emotes, so I thought that would be worth trying as well.
-
@hungrier Actually, what happens with actual non-preview emotes?
-
@hungrier Looks like they butt right up against each other. So the original one is probably the one to use.
-
I think this is too detailed for emote size:
-
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
@hungrier Looks like they butt right up against each other. So the original one is probably the one to use.
It's the 1px of padding on the selector:
html:not([data-disable-tdwtf-css]) .composer .preview .img-responsive, html:not([data-disable-tdwtf-css]) .topic .posts .content .img-responsive, html:not([data-disable-tdwtf-css]) [component="chat/message/body"] .img-responsive
Real emojis don't have the img-responsive class.
-
@error I've fixed that for myself in custom CSS, but unfortunately not everyone's got my custom CSS (or even use the Slate theme)
-
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
unfortunately not everyone ... use[s] the Slate theme
I do not consider that unfortunate.
-
@HardwareGeek said in Emoji testing:
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
unfortunately not everyone ... use[s] the Slate theme
I do not consider that unfortunate.
Yeah. The dark themes here suck.
-
@loopback0 Enhancing the dark theme with custom CSS:
-
@hungrier
E_WARTHOG_TOO_ENERGETIC
-
Looks like I've managed to get notifications about this thread again.
I've used the advanced technique of unwatching and watching the thread again.
-
For future reference.
-
-
For some reason, we don't seem to have a "garage" emoji; at least nothing autocompletes.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Zecc said in Emoji testing:
Looks like I've managed to get notifications about this thread again.
I've used the advanced technique of unwatching and watching the thread again.
Spoke too soon. FFS
-
@HardwareGeek said in Emoji testing:
For some reason, we don't seem to have a "garage" emoji; at least nothing autocompletes.
works well enough.
Yes, I know that's not a garage.EDIT: You nearly had me quadruple-post that again, . Not this time...
-
-
@topspin said in Emoji testing:
@HardwareGeek said in Emoji testing:
For some reason, we don't seem to have a "garage" emoji; at least nothing autocompletes.
works well enough.
Yes, I know that's not a garage.EDIT: You nearly had me quadruple-post that again, . Not this time...
Maybe we need a variant of , just make sure it's red.
-
-
@loopback0 From that site:
-
@JBert said in Emoji testing:
Maybe we need a variant of , just make sure it's red.
This is a good idea. Put the in the . I don't think it matters much what color the is (), but if you really like red, you could maybe have red coming from the and/or the .
I'd try putting the in the myself, but I'm (supposed to be) working.
-
@HardwareGeek said in Emoji testing:
I don't think it matters much what color the is (),
Maybe an animated emojicon where the colour changes like it's an RGB ? Or an RGB bikeshed? Or both?
-
@HardwareGeek said in Emoji testing:
I'd try putting the in the myself, but I'm (supposed to be) working.
Excellent idea.
-
@Zecc Ship it!
-
@Zecc I have an idea that may end up being totally stupid, which I'll try to implement whenever I have some time
-
@hungrier I hope it's the same idea as I have, because I'm to generate a color-shifting gajiff.
-
-
@hungrier I don't think it really works at emoji size. Maybe brighter colors and/or slower animation.
-
@HardwareGeek How about a different version?
-
@HardwareGeek
More like a rainbow then?
-
@hungrier Is one side narrower than the other?
-
@loopback0 The right side is 1px narrower at full size. There are also some dancing pixels along the diagonal edges that are inconsistent in the different colours, which I don't know how it happened since they are all literally the same layer, duplicated and recoloured.
-
-
@hungrier said in Emoji testing:
@loopback0 The right side is 1px narrower at full size. There are also some dancing pixels along the diagonal edges that are inconsistent in the different colours, which I don't know how it happened since they are all literally the same layer, duplicated and recoloured.
Did you recolor it using the "paint can" / "fill" tool? It looks like the color layers progressively increase the width...
-
@loopback0 said in Emoji testing:
On Windows at emoji size it looks right, but on macOS at emoji size it looks like above.
-
@loopback0 said in Emoji testing:
On Windows at emoji size it looks right, but on macOS at emoji size it looks like above.
Consistency.
-
This one should have those pixel issues fixed. Hopefully.
-
I would have made the color shifting much slower. Like, barely noticeable slower.
That would take a lot more frames though.
-
@Zecc This one is a bit noticeable at times, but I think should do the trick
-
-
-
@loopback0 said in Emoji testing:
Still 1px different
Both sides are 16px in full-size.
@loopback0 said in Emoji testing:
The quicker colour change is better IMO
Conceptually I like the idea of an extremely long time between changes, since it's not visually apparent that anything is going on unless you happen to catch it right as it changes. Just sometimes you'll see a green one and sometimes it'll be red.
-
@hungrier Exactly!
Of course, now anyone that's read this will know, but fortunately that will be a minority of us, I think.
-
@Bulb said in TIL (about the Dark Arts of HTML):
@Zecc said in TIL (about the Dark Arts of HTML):
Postgres accepts 'allballs' in a time literal
If it was an alternative to something more readable like
midnight
, OK, but as the only special value for time (rather than datetime)Also the way the values are resolved at statement compilation time rather than execution time is a serious ¹
¹ I thought there was a foot/leg emoji, but can't find it. Either the search is or the emoji has some name (or there actually isn't one, because the emoji sets are totally random).
For later emojification.I think the second one might be clearer in emoji size.
Couldn't help myself:
-
Request:
:galaxy-brain:
How do we not have that yet?!