Looooong lists (Re: ASDESIGNED: why on earth would you want to search your bookmarks?)
-
@tar said in ASDESIGNED: why on earth would you want to search your bookmarks?:
- Open http://what.thedailywtf.com/users/<you>/activity/bookmarks
- Think to yourself, "wow I have a lot of bookmarks, but I remember whose post I bookmarked..."
103232897217598216892693821. Try Ctrl+F anyway just to see if it does anything sensible.
67812632648263862. Observe that it doesn't - Think to yourself "oh, bother, I guess I'll just have to scroll down like some kind of chimpanzee would then, seeing as I _can't even get the entire list into memory at once...."
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999. Decide maybe that bookmarks aren't actually that big of a deal anyway, go do something else instead... - Try to break numbered list formatting in your "bug report" for shits and giggles...
BITCH!COMPLAIN!
Huh, NodeBB parser breaks on this old post.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
1111111111. Testing.
11111111111. Testing.
111111111111. Testing.
1111111111111. Testing.
11111111111111. Testing.
It looks like NodeBB only handles list indices up to 9 digits long. That's not even full
int32
!
-
@gąska said in Looooong lists (Re: ASDESIGNED: why on earth would you want to search your bookmarks?):
only handles list indices up to 9 digits long
Assuming you start somewhere in the single gidgits, there's not enough room in a post to get that far.
After all, you'd need more posts, and nobody would support the number of posts needed to count that...
-
@gąska said in Looooong lists (Re: ASDESIGNED: why on earth would you want to search your bookmarks?):
@tar said in ASDESIGNED: why on earth would you want to search your bookmarks?:
- Open http://what.thedailywtf.com/users/<you>/activity/bookmarks
- Think to yourself, "wow I have a lot of bookmarks, but I remember whose post I bookmarked..."
103232897217598216892693821. Try Ctrl+F anyway just to see if it does anything sensible.
67812632648263862. Observe that it doesn't - Think to yourself "oh, bother, I guess I'll just have to scroll down like some kind of chimpanzee would then, seeing as I _can't even get the entire list into memory at once...."
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999. Decide maybe that bookmarks aren't actually that big of a deal anyway, go do something else instead... - Try to break numbered list formatting in your "bug report" for shits and giggles...
BITCH!COMPLAIN!
Huh, NodeBB parser breaks on this old post.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
1111111111. Testing.
11111111111. Testing.
111111111111. Testing.
1111111111111. Testing.
11111111111111. Testing.
It looks like NodeBB only handles list indices up to 9 digits long. That's not even full
int32
!The styles are somewhat less generous...
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
- Testing.
-
@tsaukpaetra said in Looooong lists (Re: ASDESIGNED: why on earth would you want to search your bookmarks?):
single gidgits
Showing results for single Gidgets:
-
...huh, it looks like HTML only handles list indices up to 10 digits long...
-
@anotherusername HTML doesn't specify integer range limits. More likely it's the browser using 32 bit integers for the index:
(+new Array(11).join(1)).toString(16) "423a35c7" // using 10 digits for the index, it still fits in 32 bits (+new Array(12).join(1)).toString(16) "2964619c7" // using 11 digits, it overflows
Much like putting caps on CSS z-index or whatnot.